For and Against Foreskin

In what might just might be the most comprehensive glossy magazine coverage devoted to foreskins ever, New York Magazine includes a slew of articles including:

  • One Man, Both Ways: The real difference, according to someone who’s been cut and uncut.

And, believe it or not, a whole lot more about foreskins. In New York Magazine

, , ,

  • http://twitter.com/SolarSiStar DLHAMER-Castillo

    It's funny how the religious do this yet at the same time say that their perfect Gawd created us but not that skin on a boy's penis, so they must mutilate God's ooops as soon as the child is born?? Anyway, i dont think it should be done at that age but left up to a fully developed male if he chooses this instead. Males apparently get cosmetic surgery much earlier than females do, yet guy always male fun of females that make their breast more attractive not thinking at least she had a choice unlike he did at birth! I feel sometimes too much is cut that early in a boy's life making a full grown male have somewhat painfully uncomfortable erection later on, but they named it Blueballs then they tend to be assholes blaming their pain on a so called teases instead and also less passionate lovers since they are now also trying to relieve this pain by ejaculating faster than uncut males.

  • http://twitter.com/intactive Shuggy

    What’s striking is that every single article is followed by a raft of comments that pick it full of holes.

  • http://twitter.com/intactive Shuggy

    What's striking is that every single article is followed by a raft of comments that pick it full of holes.

21