Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité – Providence, Miracle or What Really Happened

By Robert Singer

Warning: Reading the following may be hazardous to your mental health. The material herein has caused readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD).  CD is the discomfort felt at the discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held belief system – It’s that queasy feeling that rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T BELIEVE THAT! Because, if you accepted the new information, you would have to admit you been ”had,” or ”conned,” in this case into shopping for stuff to trash the planet.

The benefit of the new information is that the world around you will finally make sense. Hot, flat, and crowded Thomas L. Friedman will finally know what planet George W. Bush is on. Bush lost the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq, but is winning the war on the environment.

At this point, it is advantageous to consider the efforts of writer Andrew Hitchcock, author of The History of the House of Rothschild.:

“The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, and are the hidden hand behind all the social cataclysms in history.”

The French and American Revolution, the Civil War, World Wars, the Industrial Revolution, the Federal Reserve and our consumer society. Rothschild policies include “total ruthlessness” and as Frederic Morton writes in the Preface to “The Rothschild’s,” “For the last one hundred and fifty years, the history of the House of Rothschild has been to an amazing degree the backstage history of Western Europe…. The overwhelming success of the Rothschild’s lay in their willingness to do what had to be done.”

What follows is the history that has been intentionally left out of our textbooks. The historical research by Toqueville, Chartier and Hitchcock if examined without prejudice supports a prima facie case that the House of Rothschild orchestrated the French and American Revolutions to create the middle class (consumers) for the purpose of trashing the planet.

Our last President Bush, connected to the House of Rothschild Global Financial Empire, was deadly serious when, after rejecting the global climate change targets of the July 2008 G8 summit, he said, “Goodbye, from the (then) world’s biggest polluter.” [1]

“Things do not happen. Things are made to happen.”   John F. Kennedy

In the early 20th century historians (such as Charles Beard), looking for the social forces they thought controlled history, emphasized industrialization and urbanization. These were forces unleashed by the industrial revolution and the textile industry. [2] By the mid 20th century, attention turned to the broader concept of “modernization,” which included industrialization, urbanization, psychological changes and changes in values. Eric Hobsbawm called “modernization” (Consumerism), “probably the most important event in human history.”

Consumerism Needs the Middle Class

If you were living in the 18th century looking for humans to consume the resources of the planet where would you find them?

Answer: 95-97percent of the population of Feudal Society. The “Third Estate” had  potential consumers but first they would need to be “enlightened” with a philosophy and movement based on respect for the dignity of man, concern for his welfare, and the creation of favorable conditions for a just social life.

Men began to think government was not something kings exercised by divine right and then Maximilien Robespierre started the French Revolution. The order was given to Robespierre in book form by Rothschild’s agent Adam Weishaupt and his associate Xavier Zwack. [3]

At the beginning of the Revolution, Kings, Monarchs and the despots of our history books held supreme power; by the time it ended, the human rights movement replaced centuries of tyranny and oppression for the common man.

Is that possible?

Revisionists are still trying to explain why the despots of our history books wouldn’t use the Guillotine to dispense with such a heretical movement.

Roger Chartier writes in The Cultural Origins of The French Revolution,  the popular notion that the Enlightenment caused the Revolution makes the mistake of post hoc ergo propter hoc – “after the fact, therefore because of the fact.” Thus, Chartier and other historians claim it was the French Revolution that made the Enlightenment.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man is often seen as the quintessential Enlightenment document but the declaration called for a meritocratic social order, not an egalitarian one. Equality was conspicuously absent.

The revisionists are consistent in dismissing the Marxist interpretation, but without a 20th century perspective on environmental damage they have no systemic theory explaining the events in late 18th century France. Ecocide was a pivotal and necessary part of the Rothschild plan for a New World Order.

Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité

In the summer of 1789 when France rose up in revolt it wasn’t over intellectual, social or political issues; it was food. The country was in the midst of a famine caused by abnormal weather.

The common man was having trouble developing his natural talent and potential because he was hungry.

“The French Revolution will only be the darkness of night to those who see it in isolation; only the times which preceded it will give the light to illuminate it.” The whole social edifice of Ancien Regime France collapsed at a single blow, and the fact that this was in the midst of one of the worst El Niño episodes of the millennium is something that should be taken into account when examining this history.”, de Tocqueville 1952, p. 249

September 11, 1814 should be examined as well. [4]

The rise of humanism and the social injustices in the 18th century did not create the revolutionary brew that saw the overthrow of the French monarchy. The House of Rothschild and the weather changed the course of history.

When the French government on the verge of bankruptcy from the seven years wars was unable to provide famine relief, public frustration erupted into violent demonstrations and the French Revolution.

Of course most despots would call for an inquisition and blame the peasants for the worst El Niño episode in history.

In 1795 when the people rebelled against a provision of the National Convention, Napoleon simply fired “a whiff of grape shot” into the mob, and the rebellion was over. [5]

Why did the House of Rothschild allow the revolution to succeed?

Answer: There were not enough consumers in the First and Second Estates in 18th century Feudal Society to weaken the planet.

The House of Rothschild Global Financial Empire

The vast accumulation of wealth, financial and natural resources of the House of Rothschild is legendary.

“And there was no news more precious than the (predetermined) outcome at Waterloo…”

Considered the turning point in history, exploiting the Battle of Waterloo gave the Rothschild family complete financial control of Europe, and soon after, the world.  England would set up a new Bank of England, with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in control.

According to one source in the late 1800s, when the planet was still in ecological balance, “it was estimated the House of Rothschild controlled almost half the wealth of the world” [6]

That would be real wealth: raw materials, commodities, copper, iron ore, petroleum, lead, copper, silver and gold.

How much are they worth today?

Almost half of the world’s fiat wealth about $500 trillion of the fiat currency (monopoly money) they created out of thin air to finance our consumer society. [7]

And their real wealth, where is it now?

Used up, as in consumed, by the middle class so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the affordable things we take for granted which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.

One of the more absurd notions that found its way into the history books and the writings of economic experts, is that somehow the International Bankers (swindlers and scoundrels of history) were made wealthier accumulating the monopoly money they printed.

The swindlers and scoundrels wealth, not yours or mine, was eventually “cut, mined and hauled away,” so that Americans could have that cheap stuff that is currently “trashing the planet”.

During the last 100 years those swindlers were able to distort the structure of relative prices; generate misallocations of labor and capital throughout the economy; rationalize new governmental interventions in the face of the market “instability” manipulate the patterns of and the profits from international trade which resulted in the Industrial Revolution, the Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970’s, the dot-com and the housing market bubbles…which resulted in unprecedented prosperity for the middle class… and $500 trillion of monopoly money for the House of Rothschild.

Did Woodrow Wilson “ruin his country” when he signed The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and made the middle class prosperous beyond precedent in the most powerful nation in the world?

Yes, because prosperous beyond precedent was unprecedented environmental damage for the planet.

Capitalism never made sense unless the goal was ecocide.

The ideal and the principle of the market economy of Capitalism was never fulfilled.

What is called capitalism is a distorted, twisted and deformed system of increasingly limited market relationships as well as market processes hampered and repressed by state controls and regulations. And overlaying this entire system are the ideologies of 18th-century mercantilism, 19th-century socialism, and 20th-century welfare statism.

Professor Ebeling, the Ludwig von Mises professor of Economics at Hillsdale College, understood something was wrong when he wrote: “the perverse development and evolution of historical capitalism, the institutions necessary for a truly free-market economy have been either undermined or prevented from emerging.”

But when he claimed, “it is the principles and the meaning of a free-market economy that must be rediscovered” in order to overcome the burden of historical capitalism and save liberty, He should have written principles must be rediscovered in order to save the planet from ecocide.

It didn’t matter if we listened to Keynes, Friedman or Mises; or for that matter anyone from the Rothschild-funded Austrian School of Economics, consumerism never made economic, environmental, or common sense. [8]

Even conscious consumers consume, as in use up the resources of the planet.

Revolution

The American and French Revolutions made consumers out of 97% of the population who could now afford, thanks to those scoundrels behind the Federal Reserve, their own castle with all the furnishings and a two-car garage for their mobile pollution devices – the personal automobile. [9]

Let me repeat, since 1910 the House of Rothschild and the Rockefellers have exchanged their real wealth for 600 trillion of fiat currency (monopoly money) they printed so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the “stuff” which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.

The only thing dumber is when a poor person in the People’s Republic of China loans about $4,000 to everyone in the (rich) USA. [10]

Rockefeller philanthropy wasn’t limited to dimes.

BIO:

Robert Singer is an Entrepreneur and the author of a forthcoming book on the Federal Reserve. His articles cover politics and the financial and environmental implications of our consumer society.  The articles have been main headlined and can be found on numerous popular websites: Marketoracle, Silverseek, Goldseek, Daylife, LAprogressive, Canadafreepress, Opednews, Daily.pk and many of the WordPress sites. Richard Daughty, The Mogambo Guru, proclaimed him a Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR).

Dem Bones is Connected To De Debt Bone by Robert Singer, an analysis of the Federal Reserve, can be found on numerous popular websites including G. Edward Griffin’s Unfiltered News. Edward Griffin is the author of the definitive work on the Federal Reserve, The Creature from Jekyll Island.

Meat, Milk and Motors: The New China Syndrome by Robert Singer, an essay about China first released in February 2009 has been widely posted and read on the Internet. Quotes from the article can be found in The Wall Street Journal Digital Network and was the Top World Story on the Pakistan Daily website for over a week.

Footnotes

[1] If “trashing the planet” was his military objective, our last President Bush was not stupid, but a brilliant commander-in-chief waging an all-out war on biodiversity, animals and rainforests. He wanted to drill in the ANWR to trash America’s last Arctic Wilderness. Sonar Testing is about torturing whales and dolphins. And the Border Fence that keeps everything out but illegal’s will disrupt an extraordinary source of biological diversity along the 2,000-mile long region.

[2] By 1850 the United States following the lead of England built their own industrial revolution around textiles.  There arose a great demand for the one crop that does more damage to the environment than planting coffee or even tobacco… Cotton. Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as large tracts of rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing the planet. These problems could have been avoided if the British textile industry hadn’t “suddenly” discovered Cotton.

[3] The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock, The Establishment By Ted Lang, Rothschild Timeline – iamthewitness.com

[4] El Niño and mankind before the 20th century by ELinacre,

August 25, 1814, British troops captured the nation’s capital during the War of 1812, setting fire to buildings in retaliation for American wins. A tornado struck as the government buildings burned, killing 30 soldiers and many local residents. One British historian noted, “More British soldiers were killed and wounded by this stroke of nature than from all the firearms the American troops had mustered in the ineffectual defense of the city.” The account in “Washington Weather” tells of a British admiral who asked a local woman whether the storm was typical of the weather “in this infernal country.” The lady told him that it was a storm specially sent by God “to drive our enemies from the city.” September 11, 1814 the decisive battle of the War of 1812.

“Washington Weather” at weatherbook.com/1814.htm,

Did a tornado wreak havoc on the War of 1812? By Kevin Myatt,

Tornadoes: library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/tornadoes/casestudies.shtml

[5] The World Book Encyclopedia

[6] The Power Of The Rothschilds By Fritz Springmeier (Excerpt – Bloodlines of the Illuminati, The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock

[7] The Zionist Connection – An Unholy Tripartite by Ted Lang

[8] From the Congress of Vienna (September 1814 to June 1815) came the phrases “Austrian School of Politics”, and the “Austrian School of Economics” presently epitomized by Milton Friedman, in which Rothschild financial schemes are used to carry out Rothschild political goals. The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock

[9] The Automobile and the Environment in American History by Martin V. Melosi

[10] The $1.4 Trillion Question by James Fallows

, ,

  • Kai

    That's all well and good but why would they want ecocide, but benefit does it bring them?

    • Robert Singer

      Disinfo readers, thanks for your comments. I appreciate you taking the time to read my articles.

      I think Kai meant to write: Ecocide, What benefit does it bring to them?

      Excellent question and there is an answer but I will need to post a few more articles before the answer will make sense . Thank you for your patience.

      In the interim, here is a clue and a quote from an earlier article:

      “Either of these events would get us started on a slow, but orderly road to a population of slaves.
      New World order conspiracy theorists expect a depopulation event to eliminate 5 billion useless eaters.”

    • Robert Palmer

      Some of these comments (almost ad hominen) look like the article was hazardous to someones mental health.

      Warning: Reading the following may be hazardous to your mental health. The material herein has caused readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD). CD is the discomfort felt at the discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held belief system – It’s that queasy feeling that rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T BELIEVE THAT! Because, if you accepted the new information, you would have to admit you been ”had,” or ”conned,” in this case into shopping for stuff to trash the planet.

      While I am having trouble with some of Mr. Singer’s conclusions, I can’t find any fault with his research.

      Could some of these comments be the result of cognitive dissonance

  • Tuna Ghost

    What, no Illuminati this time? Aww.

    What I don't understand is, besides the question of “why” (noted above), is the notion that because you've drawn together all these exaggerated ideas into a large conspiracy, and having noted the impact of man on the enviroment, you automatically connect the two as intended cause-and-effect. “Things do not happen, they are made to happen”. Yes, but that quote is used just as often by the religious, where it makes about as much sense. There is no need of a centuries-old conspiracy to explain the degredation of our enviroment. The greed and shortsighted-ness leading to over-consumption in the western world is apparent in daily life. Of course, if you look for a conspiracy you're always going to find it, whether it's there or not.

    Let's keep one thing in mind: no one in their right mind is worried about the planet Earth. Earth has survived worse enviroments than any we could fashion. The planet is going to be okay, what enviromentalists are worried about is us. Everyone. The planet isn't in trouble, everyone living on it is (which is an important distinction). Which includes the Rothschilds, unless the Illuminati has given them space-traveling technology, in which case I'll look like an ass.

    • Robert Singer

      “The greed and shortsighted-ness” Where is the Greed?

      According to one source in the late 1800s, when the planet was still in ecological balance, “it was estimated the House of Rothschild controlled almost half the wealth of the world” [6]

      That would be real wealth: raw materials, commodities, copper, iron ore, petroleum, lead, copper, silver and gold.

      How much are they worth today?

      Almost half of the world’s fiat wealth about $500 trillion of the fiat currency (monopoly money) they created out of thin air to finance our consumer society. [7]

      And their real wealth, where is it now?

      Used up, as in consumed, by the middle class so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the affordable things we take for granted which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.

      One of the more absurd notions that found its way into the history books and the writings of economic experts, is that somehow the International Bankers (swindlers and scoundrels of history) were made wealthier accumulating the monopoly money they printed.

      The swindlers and scoundrels wealth, not yours or mine, was eventually “cut, mined and hauled away,” so that Americans could have that cheap stuff that is currently “trashing the planet”.

      • Tuna Ghost

        Yeah, buddy, I read all that the first time. Moving on:

        Your answer to “why” was a quote from an earlier piece by you: “Either of these events would get us started on a slow, but orderly road to a population of slaves. New World order conspiracy theorists expect a depopulation event to eliminate 5 billion useless eaters.”

        Aside from the fact that there is no mention made to the events that would get us started on a slow but orderly road to a population of slaves (even though, during the timeframe you've mentioned, the slave trade was still going very strong), you've made reference to nameless New World Order conspiracy theorists. Ignoring the fact that they are nameless, thus credential-less and not at all accountable for whatever ridiculous ideas they've given you, for what reason are we to take them seriously? They are not a reputable source for accurate information.

        If the quote is leading to where I think it is leading (by all means, please correct me if I've missed it), the environmental damage will lead to the “event” that is supposed to eliminate 5 billion “useless eaters”. This environmental damage is a direct result of the Rothschilds creating a middle class whose purpose was to consume and consume and consume resources until the environment is depleted.

        So. Environmental catastrophe, or just resource depletion, cuts the world population by 5 billion to roughly 1.7 billion (assuming it happens tomorrow). The population of the world in the 18th century was less than 900 million. There are several reasons for the jump in population, a major one being the industrial revolution, for which the Rothschilds are responsible (so they claim). So they INCREASE the world's population, orchestrate events on a scale so vast as to be nigh unimaginable, even going so far as to control the effing weather, so that they can DECREASE it 300 years later? Decrease it to a number that is still almost a BILLION people larger than it was when they started the whole goddam plot?

        How does that make any sense?

        And that doesn't answer any of the questions about them supposedly controlling the weather. Nor does it address the fact that the depletion of vital resources leaves everyone, including the ruling elite, in a shitty situation.

        As noted earlier: all the problems you've mentioned can be, and have been, shown to be caused by mundane, everyday problems that have plagued humanity long before the Rothschilds showed up–Greed, Ignorance, Shortsighted-ness. The thing about conspiracies, as noted earlier, is that they will always be there if you look for them. It looks more and more like you're making signal out of noise, connecting raindrops on a window to make a picture.

        And for the final questions: who are you? What are your qualifications? What are your credentials? What have you done besides write articles on the internet? Privacy is a valuable thing, certainly, but if you want people to take you seriously you ought to divulge something to let us know you're not one of the million conspiracy cranks polluting the internet (including, regrettably, Disinfo).

        • Robert Singer

          You have taken my clue

          “Either of these events would get us started on a slow, but orderly road to a population of slaves. New World order conspiracy theorists expect a depopulation event to eliminate 5 billion useless eaters.”

          Out of context.

          Let's agree to disagree.

          Thanks

          • Tuna Ghost

            Really? You're not going to answer ANY of my questions?

            Tell you what–I'll agree to disagree, even though I'm not disagreeing with you so much as asking for some clarification on ANY the outrageous claims you're making, if you provide your credentials and qualifications beyond being an “entrepreneur” and writing articles on the internet.

            And I didn't take your clue out of context. There was precious little context for it to begin with. If I've misinterpreted it by all means provide illumination.

          • Robert Singer

            Let's forget the Clue, I should have left it out of the first comment.

            When you say “outrageous claims” I think you are referring to the following:
            1. If you were living in the 18th century looking for humans to consume the resources of the planet where would you find them?

            Answer: 95-97percent of the population of Feudal Society. The “Third Estate” had potential consumers but first they would need to be “enlightened” with a philosophy and movement based on respect for the dignity of man, concern for his welfare, and the creation of favorable conditions for a just social life.

            2. According to one source in the late 1800s, when the planet was still in ecological balance, “it was estimated the House of Rothschild controlled almost half the wealth of the world” [6] That would be real wealth: raw materials, commodities, copper, iron ore, petroleum, lead, copper, silver and gold.

            How much are they worth today?

            Almost half of the world’s fiat wealth about $500 trillion of the fiat currency (monopoly money) they created out of thin air to finance our consumer society. [7]

            And their real wealth, where is it now?

            Used up, as in consumed, by the middle class so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the affordable things we take for granted which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.

            One of the more absurd notions that found its way into the history books and the writings of economic experts, is that somehow the International Bankers (swindlers and scoundrels of history) were made wealthier accumulating the monopoly money they printed.

            The swindlers and scoundrels wealth, not yours or mine, was eventually “cut, mined and hauled away,” so that Americans could have that cheap stuff that is currently “trashing the planet”.

            3. Did Woodrow Wilson “ruin his country” when he signed The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and made the middle class prosperous beyond precedent in the most powerful nation in the world?

            Yes, because prosperous beyond precedent was unprecedented environmental damage for the planet.

            Capitalism never made sense unless the goal was ecocide.

            The ideal and the principle of the market economy of Capitalism was never fulfilled.

            What is called capitalism is a distorted, twisted and deformed system of increasingly limited market relationships as well as market processes hampered and repressed by state controls and regulations. And overlaying this entire system are the ideologies of 18th-century mercantilism, 19th-century socialism, and 20th-century welfare statism.

            Professor Ebeling, the Ludwig von Mises professor of Economics at Hillsdale College, understood something was wrong when he wrote: “the perverse development and evolution of historical capitalism, the institutions necessary for a truly free-market economy have been either undermined or prevented from emerging.”

            But when he claimed, “it is the principles and the meaning of a free-market economy that must be rediscovered” in order to overcome the burden of historical capitalism and save liberty, He should have written principles must be rediscovered in order to save the planet from ecocide.

            It didn’t matter if we listened to Keynes, Friedman or Mises; or for that matter anyone from the Rothschild-funded Austrian School of Economics, consumerism never made economic, environmental, or common sense. [8]

            Even conscious consumers consume, as in use up the resources of the planet.

            Revolution

            The American and French Revolutions made consumers out of 97% of the population who could now afford, thanks to those scoundrels behind the Federal Reserve, their own castle with all the furnishings and a two-car garage for their mobile pollution devices – the personal automobile. [9]

            Let me repeat, since 1910 the House of Rothschild and the Rockefellers have exchanged their real wealth for 600 trillion of fiat currency (monopoly money) they printed so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the “stuff” which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.

            The only thing dumber is when a poor person in the People’s Republic of China loans about $4,000 to everyone in the (rich) USA. [10]

            Rockefeller philanthropy wasn’t limited to dimes.
            [END of “Outrageous Claims”]

            My conclusions are based on the research in my article and the footnotes.

            If you have any information to the contrary please let me know.

            I have nothing to add to my credentials or qualifications.

            Thank you

  • Drew

    In addition to the other things that are mentioned above, the thesis of this article that the American and French Revolutions were designed so that people could afford things that didn't exist until centuries later seems a bit…flawed, to put it mildly, and completely bananas once you factor in that it's also saying that El Nino, part of the weather (the effects of which is hard to guage now, let alone back in the 18th century), was “all part of the plan.”

    And, to cover previous ground, even if they were so far-sighted to have factored into their plans all these things that NO PERSON EVER could have possibly factored in, they would have seen that completely destroying the planet would also mean wiping them out, and would have then said, “Gee, that wouldn't be too good an idea,” shrugged, and then scrapped that plan.

    • Robert Singer

      “NO PERSON EVER Could have …”, What about Cotton?

      By 1850 America had built their own industrial revolutions around textiles so there was a great demand for the one crop that does more damage to the environment than planting coffee or tobacco… cotton.

      Multiple Choice Question: Why Cotton?

      1. Cotton in the 1700’s was rare: Whilst the writers of antiquity, both sacred and profane, abound in allusions to clothing made of wool, flax and hemp, there are scarcely a dozen sentences to be found in the whole body of Greek and Latin literature, and not one in Hebrew, referring to cotton.
      2. Cotton fibers are three-quarters of an inch while other fiber bundles are up to fifteen feet long, which gives other fibers for example Hemp eight times the tensile strength and four times the durability of cotton.
      3. Thanks to technology Cotton is adapted to a wide range of uses, it spins easily, and the environmental costs of cotton cultivation are enormous.
      4. Cotton is grown on 3% of the earths best arable land and uses a whopping 26% of the worlds pesticides.
      5. Cotton requires heavy irrigation and consumes more than 7% of the fertilizer used annually.

      And the award for the pesticide king goes to Cotton.

      When the British looked around in the 1700’s for fibers to build their textile industry they decided not to use Hemp.

      Multiple Choice Question: Why not Hemp?

      1. Cotton in the 1700’s was rare: Whilst the writers of antiquity, both sacred and profane, abound in allusions to clothing made of wool, flax and hemp, there are scarcely a dozen sentences to be found in the whole body of Greek and Latin literature, and not one in Hebrew, referring to cotton.
      2. Cotton fibers are three-quarters of an inch while other fiber bundles are up to fifteen feet long, which gives other fibers for example Hemp eight times the tensile strength and four times the durability of cotton.
      3. There are no environmental costs of Hemp.
      4. Hemp does NOT use a whopping 26% of the worlds pesticides.
      5. Hemp does NOT require heavy irrigation and does NOT consume more than 7% of the fertilizer used annually.

      “With few insect enemies and little competition from weeds, hemp is a much better candidate than cotton to produce a high quality, sustainable and organcially grown fiber.”.

      Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing people a great number of these problems could have been avoided if the textile industry hadn’t “suddenly” discovered Cotton. “Much of the groundwater tested in agricultural regions around the world has been contaminated by runoff from pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. Already 15,000 lakes in the United States are so contaminated that nothing can live in them.”

      And the award for the pesticide king goes to Cotton.

      Hemp would get the award for the Most environmentally friendly plant of all time.

      Planting Hemp actually restores damaged soil.

      And in one of those confusing contradictions in colonial America you could be jailed for refusing to grow hemp because until the 1920's, Hemp was a major crop supplying the world with its main supply of food and fiber (80% of clothing was made from Hemp).

      And before you contemplate the cotton industry wanted to protect their profits think again, there was no cotton industry in 1850. And finally for those under the spell of the DEA and believe Hemp is Marijuana, the US government has acknowledged that Industrial Hemp and marijuana are not the same plant. And forget marijuana growers trying to hide their plants in hemp fields. THC types of Cannabis. High THC (“narcotic, “drug” or “marijuana”) Cannabis and low THC (“high CBD,” “fiber,” “industrial,” “hemp”) Cannabis readily cross pollinate. The offspring tend toward characteristics intermediate between the parents. Nobody wants them.

      They're “good for nothing.”

      • Drew

        Good point, but you took that doesn't answer how they could have factored in the weather, a highly unpredictable element, which is what I was referring to in the quote that you took out of context to talk about something completely unrelated.

        • Robert Singer

          The weather observation wasn't made by me, it was the famous historian de Tocqueville:

          “The French Revolution will only be the darkness of night to those who see it in isolation; only the times which preceded it will give the light to illuminate it.” The whole social edifice of Ancien Regime France collapsed at a single blow, and the fact that this was in the midst of one of the worst El Niño episodes of the millennium is something that should be taken into account when examining this history.”, de Tocqueville 1952, p. 249

          [4] El Niño and mankind before the 20th century by ELinacre,

          August 25, 1814, British troops captured the nation’s capital during the War of 1812, setting fire to buildings in retaliation for American wins. A tornado struck as the government buildings burned, killing 30 soldiers and many local residents. One British historian noted, “More British soldiers were killed and wounded by this stroke of nature than from all the firearms the American troops had mustered in the ineffectual defense of the city.” The account in “Washington Weather” tells of a British admiral who asked a local woman whether the storm was typical of the weather “in this infernal country.” The lady told him that it was a storm specially sent by God “to drive our enemies from the city.” September 11, 1814 the decisive battle of the War of 1812.

          Readers are entitled to draw their own conclusions.

          • Drew

            “The weather observation wasn't made by me, it was the famous historian de Tocqueville”

            Yes, but you are using it as a support for your claims, are you not? And again, you have continued to evade any of the logical questions that have come up. Cutting and pasting what you've already written in the essay does nothing to answer them.

  • jmp

    while i dont tend to disagree that the rothchilds and rockefellers are probably running the world, certainly there is a primal subliminal state to which we are all subject that tells us, “I have to win!” and if my birthright were an empire that stretches beyond all physical borders into the domain of literally owning and being able to pull strings in every direction i suppose beyond squandering it and living happily or using to my time to become the greatest sorcerer known to mankind, i suppose one of the more endearing endpoints would be to expand the empire, providing of course that i were an ignorant non-spiritual person with no altruism or interest in seeing humanity prosper and got some sick kind of joy out of milking every tiny financial foothold that i have over people to the fullest extent and watching them suffer to pay the bills that i send them. I mean you'd have to be the most twisted person on earth, you'd have to be satan himself to do that. I prefer to believe that it is the result of policy. Policy is the idea that a certain method is always to be done whether or not it accomplishes its purpose, going so far as to forget that purpose and retain the policy. Look at disney after walt died. Look at ANY RELIGION. It's all just policy gone haywire, new people running old machines for reasons other than they were created.

  • ElRock

    If I promise to buy your book will you stop posting?

    • ElRock

      Excuse me. I mean to say, “Will you stop advertising?”

  • Robert Palmer

    Some of these comments (almost ad hominen) look like the article was hazardous to someones mental health.

    Warning: Reading the following may be hazardous to your mental health. The material herein has caused readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD). CD is the discomfort felt at the discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held belief system – It’s that queasy feeling that rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T BELIEVE THAT! Because, if you accepted the new information, you would have to admit you been ”had,” or ”conned,” in this case into shopping for stuff to trash the planet.

    While I am having trouble with some of Mr. Singer’s conclusions, I can’t find any fault with his research.

    Could some of these comments be the result of cognitive dissonance

    • Tuna Ghost

      Friend, while Cognitive Dissonance can cause people to turn their eyes away from the truth, keep in mind you're on a site where people daily attempt to uncover the truth behind the garbage we are constantly told. We are more than willing to suspend disbelief for a few minutes to consider a new perspective or idea. We really don't need to be told what congnitive dissonance is, and to imply that people aren't accepting uncorroborated stories containing facts that fly in the face of science and reason coming from someone who has no qualifications or credentials beyond writing stuff on the internet because we “just can't handle the truth” (which is what your claims of cognitive dissonance amount to) is insulting and, frankly, tiresome.

  • defeatisyourbirthright

    I thought the big question is why do all this to depopulate later? And as Tuna Ghost stated why depopulate to a number more than twice that existed at the time? The goal was to have slaves? You push this Ecocide theory, BUT TO WHAT END? I understand debt-slavery but what does killing the planet have to do with it? AS was also stated the earth will survive, it's the people that are going to have a hard time. It is a human workshop? What? What? What? There's no purpose here.

    • Robert Palmer

      Mr. Singer is a frequent contributor to Rumor Mill News. I just found these two posts.

      I can't speak for him but it looks like he thinks there is some kind of game where the Elite, Illuminati or whaterever you want to call them, are trying to weaken the Earth by making us consumers (not destroy it, a nuclear war would destroy it) in order to get immortality in a new world order. Henry Kissinger's famous quote “Useless Eaters” seem to fit his hypothesis.

      A Particularly Ominous Sign (53 minutes ago)

      Posted By: rds2301 <Send E-Mail>
      Date: Saturday, 24-Oct-2009 18:31:09

      [I apologize for the informality of this post]

      Has anyone else noticed the Nuclear War hysteria has just about fallen off the radar screen?

      Is it my imagination or was the “unthinkable” and stories like the one at Pakalert “Escalation Scenarios: The Third World War and Its Aftermath” everywhere until the beginning of October…when they faded into the background and Swine Flu returned with a vengeance.

      WASHINGTON (53 minutes ago) – President Barack Obama declared the swine flu outbreak a national emergency, giving his health chief the power to let hospitals move emergency rooms offsite to speed treatment and protect noninfected patients.

      Believe it or not this is a bad sign: A world nuclear war that involves most or all nuclear powers releasing a large proportion of their nuclear weapons at targets in nuclear, and perhaps non-nuclear, states was a BLUFF.

      The book of revelation the greatest piece of propoganda ever written describes what happens when the TPTB win the game, it’s called Armageddon, and there is no nuclear war in valley of Megiddo:

      This great slaughter of the Antichrist and his armies will take place in and around the valley of Megiddo near Haifa in Israel. It will mark the end of man's cruel rule on earth (you mean the cruel rule that gave the west the highest standard of living so we could trash the planet), as Jesus, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and His Heavenly forces (TPTB) forcibly take over the World to rule and reign and run it the way it should have been run if man had not disobeyed God (lived in disharmony with the earth) and gone his own selfish way!

      And so begins a period known as the New World Order (Millennium), a thousand years of peace and plenty and paradise on Earth for The House of Rothschild, the Bilderbergers, the CFR and other secret societies in other words the elite TPTB.

      The number 200 million is mentioned in Revelation 9:16. This number is expressed in the Greek as 'two myriads of myriads' or in numeric form, 'two 10,000 of 10,000'. The 200 million is a number applied to the number of horsemen which cross the Euphrates and kill a third of mankind.

      Rev 9:16 does not describe a nuclear event and neither does Albert Pike because a nuclear event makes the planet uninhabitable for the one world governors as well as their slaves.

      If TPTB have abandoned a nuclear strategy and returned to the FLU this is not a good sign.

      Will follow up on this post later, I need time to do some more research.
      This is actually A Particularly Ominous GOOD Sign

      Posted By: rds2301 <Send E-Mail>
      Date: Saturday, 24-Oct-2009 23:39:57

      In Response To: A Particularly Ominous Sign (53 minutes ago) (rds2301)

      If I am correct and TPTB had to BLUFF with the threat of a Nuclear Event then

      Sometime between October of 2008 and October of 2009 TPTB determined they had LOST the struggele to take over the Earth and had to BLUFF.

      Keep in mind The game is not Over.

      Let's figure out what we did before that worked and resume that behavior or create the positive energy to help the Earth WIN!

      And yes it's related (according to me) to “The Most Important Issue in the History of the Universe”
      http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?…

      • Tuna Ghost

        beedle-beedle-beep-boop

        That's the sound I make when someone goes off on an unrelated tangent after failing to provide any corroborating evidence for a pile of bullshit they just posted.

  • Drew

    “The weather observation wasn’t made by me, it was the famous historian de Tocqueville”

    Yes, but you are using it as a support for your claims, are you not? And again, you have continued to evade any of the logical questions that have come up. Cutting and pasting what you’ve already written in the essay does nothing to answer them.

21