Washington Times Reports 9/11 Inconsistencies

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 TruthJennifer Harper for the Washington Times:

A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center.

“In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially, exploded outwards,” says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Mr. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new petition requesting a formal inquiry.

“The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction. We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials,” Mr. Gage adds.

The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule.

He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in “pure free-fall acceleration.” He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of “multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph” and the “mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking.”

There is also evidence of “advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust,” Mr. Gage says. The group’s petition at www.ae911truth.org is already on its way to members of Congress…

[continues in the Washington Times]

, , ,

3 Responses to Washington Times Reports 9/11 Inconsistencies

  1. honu February 26, 2010 at 4:34 pm #

    Hell yes! I've been following Mr. Gage's group for awhile now and they have a great amount of information supporting their positions. I've been ridiculed for my belief that the wtc towers didn't fall directly due to the plane crashes but I believe that if any doubters could for a moment, step outside the notion that this is a “conspiracy theory” and simply look at the evidence objectively, they would have to concede there was something fishy going on there at the very least. The main problem I've come up against with stating my beliefs about the wtc tower attacks is a seeming split within the group of people who believe the towers fell by design rather than by the plane attacks. One portion will say that Bush and his croneys are behind it. I have seen no evidence of this and reject this idea. My belief is strictly based on the evidence I've seen and it has led me to believe that it was a planned demolition. Who was behind it and for what exact purpose I don't know. All I do know is that the official report is completely inadequate to explain what happened to those towers that day.

  2. Anonymous February 27, 2010 at 6:18 am #

    The whole 9-11 official story is ridiculous. There is no way 3 buildings of that size could all fall that way without a planned demolition. Maybe in a freak world, one of those buildings could fall that way (not really), but not three. Bldg. 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane. I can’t imagine guys running into those buildings after the plane crashes to plant explosives to bring them down. So charges had to be planted beforehand. That’s where the implications start to thicken for me. If they were planted before the planes hit, its not a stretch to think that these 2 things are connected. That still leaves the obvious questions….Who’s responible? While it appears that our government is covering something, who is to say what that is exactly and why?

    For all we know, any cover up on the part of government may just be to shift the embarassment of being so completly caught with our pants down that day. This of course is one theory in a zillion possiblities.

    Who are the evil masterminds and what insidious ends do they serve?
    Tune in next week for future installments….

  3. GoodDoktorBad February 27, 2010 at 1:18 am #

    The whole 9-11 official story is ridiculous. There is no way 3 buildings of that size could all fall that way without a planned demolition. Maybe in a freak world, one of those buildings could fall that way (not really), but not three. Bldg. 7 wasn't even hit by anything. I can't imagine guys running into those buildings after the plane crashes to plant explosives to bring them down. So charges had to be planted beforehand. That's where the implications start to thicken for me. If they were planted before the planes hit, its not a stretch to think that these things are connected. That still leaves the obvious questions….Who's responible? While it appears that our government is covering something, who is to say what that is exactly and why?

    For all we know, any cover up on the part of government may just be to shift the embarassment of being so complety caught with our pants down that day. This of course is one theory in a zillion possiblities.

    Who are the evil masterminds and what insidious ends do they serve?
    Tune in next week for future installments….

Leave a Reply