Experts Say the U.S. Pays Too Much to Fight Cancer

Ellen Gibson writes on Bloomberg News via the Columbus Dispatch:

The rising cost of cancer research and care, which helped reduce death rates by 16 percent over 40 years, is straining the U.S. health system and needs to be restrained, commentators said in a special edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Cancer research has cost the U.S. government $100 billion since 1971 and the price of care, accounting for inflation, has more than doubled to $90 billion since 1990, according to six journal reports that raise key questions about the past and future success of the U.S. “War on Cancer,” announced by then-President Richard Nixon in 1971.

The reduced death rates result from anti-smoking campaigns, early disease detection and new drugs, which can cost individual patients as much as $100,000 a year. The price of the drugs, and the care tied to their use, can be lowered by shifting to a system in which the cost of drugs, tests and other care are combined in a single provider payment, researchers said.

Such a system would push doctors to “shop carefully for the services” patients need, wrote the researchers from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, led by Elena Elkin, in a commentary that was among those included in the special issue.

Read More on the Columbus Dispatch

, , , , , ,

  • http://www.copywriter.com.au/ Wanda

    yeah, its really expensive but anyway we pay our taxes for the good of many. health is wealth and I believe its ok to have an eye on this matter and spend cash if we have to. :-)

  • Hadrian999

    sure, we spend too much for everything else why not health care

  • http://customervideoreviews.co.uk Mark Video

    I don’t think this article is saying that we should spend ‘less’ to help battle the ailments of cancer, as many would assume, but rather that money is being spent inefficiently so it is in some sense ‘too much’, but maybe not the best choice of words, however it probably gets the basic message across that something needs to be looked at and changed.

  • http://customervideoreviews.co.uk Mark Video

    I don't think this article is saying that we should spend 'less' to help battle the ailments of cancer, as many would assume, but rather that money is being spent inefficiently so it is in some sense 'too much', but maybe not the best choice of words, however it probably gets the basic message across that something needs to be looked at and changed.