A Cure For HIV And AIDS

By on July 24, 2010 in News 8

A cure may not be so far from reality, as reported by ABC News:

For years, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) researchers have shied away from the whole notion of a cure, largely because evidence showed the virus can persist even under intensive treatment.

But now, they are — tentatively — expressing a renewed interest in the idea.

That interest is sparked by clinical data showing an apparent cure in a single case and some technical advances that make it easier to track very low levels of HIV infection, experts said at the International AIDS Conference here.

But progress is hampered by lack of money for research in the field and by what one prominent researcher called “fundamental gaps” in the understanding of how HIV and the human body interact…

[continues at ABC News]

, , , ,

  • Hadrian999

    i doubt we'll ever see a cure, treatment is too profitable.

  • APR

    @Hadrian999 “i doubt we'll ever see a cure, treatment is too profitable.” – Exactly correct. This is why there is “no cure” for cancer, even though it was discovered by Royal R. Rife around 1934. He found that a specific radio frequency, 11.78 Mhz, destroyed the cancer virus (yes, it is a viral disease) and cured patients in clinics supervised by MDs. Chemotherapy and radiation are worthless, harmful even, and obsolete. Rife's cure would involve going to an outpatient clinic every three days and getting three minutes of radio-frequency treatment until the cancer is gone. No more multi-billion dollar cancer industry. http://www.youtube.com/user/shawnfella#p/u/0/Wf… . Watch the DVD. Worth every penny.

    AIDS will not be cured until it does it's job, which is to reduce the world's population by a significant amount. It was created for that purpose. The request for funding for developing such a germ is right there in the Congressional Record:

    “Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective micro-organism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms.” Dr. MacArthur then added “Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases.” He concluded that a feasibility research programme to this end “could be completed in approximately 5 years at a cost of $10 million.” The requested sum was granted.
    http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/pentagon_aids.htm
    I first saw the photocopied page from the Congressional Record in “Behold a Pale Horse” by William Cooper. Unfortunately the book has a lot of disinformation along with facts in order to discredit real evidence – a technique called “well poisoning.” …. I'll stop now …

    • Haystack

      So, build a device that bombards tumors with radio waves, and get rich curing cancer with it instead of selling DVDs. Nobody can stop you, if you can actually demonstrate that it works.

      These healthcare/drug companies are all in competition with one another. If one of them came out with a panacea for all cancers, or for HIV, they'd not only make money selling it, but they'd garner enormous prestige, and render their competitors' treatments obsolete. I wonder how you imagine that capitalism ever innovates. Why couldn't the candlemaking industry suppress the electric lightbulb, or the buggy makers suppress the automobile?

      Even setting money aside, do you imagine that the people who run health/drug companies are themselves immune to cancer? They've got these cancer treatments laying around that they won't use, even when they themselves are being affected by the disease? Survival surely trumps wealth when it comes to self-interest.

      • Hadrian999

        ask youself why invest r&d money in maybe getting a cure when you already make extravagant revenue from treatment. it only makes sense to invest in what will increase retinue or maintain what they have.
        ask yourself why we have gone from the biplane to the stealth bomber and to the moon in one lifetime,
        harnessed the power of the atom, we have seen the explosion of computers from glorified giant calculators
        to what is capable today. we have seen all these herculean leaps in technology yet we have made such little progress in the internal combustion engine and cancer and heart disease are still treated by maintenance. does this seem logical to you?

      • APR

        “So, build a device that bombards tumors with radio waves, and get rich curing cancer with it instead of selling DVDs. Nobody can stop you, if you can actually demonstrate that it works.”

        That was already tried, shortly after the cure was discovered. The drug companies won the day, though, via the profit-driven AMA, and anyone using Rife's devices were busted for “quackery,” even though the treatment was proven to work.

        “When money comes in the door, science goes out the window.” – R. R. Rife

    • A Bad Joke

      Cancer is not a viral disease you conspiracy nut.

      • APR

        Yes, label something a “conspiracy” and debunk it. All it takes is one word.

        Rife used Koch's postulates, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates , and a lot of laboratory mice. He used the finest ceramic filters available to isolate a microorganism, smaller than a bacterium, from a human breast tumor mass. This was injected into a mouse and a tumor resulted. The tumor was excised from the mouse, finely divided, run through a sterile filter, injected into another healthy mouse and a tumor was again produced. This is how he isolated the microorganism associated with cancer. He then went on to cultivate it on a pork-based medium and kill it with a specific radio frequency.

        The use of this therapy would render the entire cancer industry obsolete. Billions of dollars would be lost. In our “advanced” civilization this is more important than actually curing a disease. There is no “conspiracy.” It is the way our current system works.

  • APR

    Yes, label something a “conspiracy” and debunk it. All it takes is one word.

    Rife used Koch’s postulates, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates , and a lot of laboratory mice. He used the finest ceramic filters available to isolate a microorganism, smaller than a bacterium, from a human breast tumor mass. This was injected into a mouse and a tumor resulted. The tumor was excised from the mouse, finely divided, run through a sterile filter, injected into another healthy mouse and a tumor was again produced. This is how he isolated the microorganism associated with cancer. He then went on to cultivate it on a pork-based medium and kill it with a specific radio frequency.

    The use of this therapy would render the entire cancer industry obsolete. Billions of dollars would be lost. In our “advanced” civilization this is more important than actually curing a disease. There is no “conspiracy.” It is the way our current system works.