9/11 Truth Billboard in San Luis Obispo California

San Luis Obispo, August 6, 2010:

In what may be the first of it’s kind in the nation, a group of 9/11 Truth activists organized, designed and paid for a commercial billboard in which 1,200 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth invite the public to “Examine the Evidence.”

Examine The Evidence

Examine The Evidence

The 24’ (w) x 12’ (h) billboard was installed sometime Thurs. afternoon, Aug. 5, 2010 on South Higuera, just south of Elks Lane in San Luis Obispo (near the Sutcliffe Cemetery). [MAP: http://tinyurl.com/24jcasv] where it will remain for 8 next weeks.

The activists who brought this matter to the people of San Luis Obispo County realize that the evidence they are attempting to share is difficult to digest but want to encourage the public to rise above their fear, take the Red Pill and learn the truth.

For if we do not, then we are telling our government that it is ok to murder 3000 of us so they can take us to war in the Middle East and kill hundreds of thousands more.

In order to understand the facts regarding the unprecedented total collapse of 3 modern, steel high rise buildings one has to be able to free themselves from preconceived notions in the face of evidence backed by fact and the laws of physics

The volumes of evidence include a peer reviewed paper published by an international team of scientists in which they describe discovering red chips of unignited thermite in all 4 samples of the World Trade Center dust that they tested. There has been no coverage of this paper in any of the mainstream press, including the so-called “Left” media. NIST (The National Institute of Standards and Technology) was tasked with explaining these 3 high rise failures and produced the reports that make the government’s case. But they have not responded to this paper either and have remained silent on many issues that the 9/11 Truth community has raised.

For more details about this highly charged issue please visit: http://www.ae911truth.org

17 Comments on "9/11 Truth Billboard in San Luis Obispo California"

  1. tonyviner | Aug 7, 2010 at 3:58 pm |

    I am not saying the government did it, but if you think they would not have you are dumb. That being said, the government most likely did it.

    • Haystack | Aug 7, 2010 at 4:08 pm |

      I agree. The government is clearly behind these billboards.

      • Why not? Harping on about WTC7 keeps public attention diverted from more pressing current problems.

        • your so cute | Aug 8, 2010 at 9:31 pm |

          Yeah, youre right, 10 years is way too long to be harping on 2,972 deaths, 10 sec freefall building collapses, a paper passport surviving an inferno, recorded news reports of explosions, statements from the 9/11 commission saying that whomever funded the attack is of no importance, no present military defense (apparently a common phenomenon..?) . . Theres really no question about what happened that day; the investigation clearly, thoroughly and honestly explained all of the facts in detail to the people. Why should we pay any mind to an event that has given us the beautiful fortune of the Patriot Act<3 I mean seriously, WTC7, whats that?? Who cares, we should be focusing on more pressing issues, like the new season of Desperate Housewives of New Jersey. We have a failing monetary system, nearly 10 million homes in forclosure, and one hell of an oil spill in the gulf.. and we cant multi-task dammit!

  2. I don't know who's behind it but the official story is unqualified horse shit in light of the evidence the architects for 9-11 truth present. It's extremely strong evidence and it convinced me. I believe the WTC tower collapses were controlled demolitions but I have no idea who is behind it or why.

  3. I think we should investigate Richard Gage, not the WTC collapses, which have already been investigated by much more qualified, competent, and honest people. The NIST engineers were only able to time the top 18 stories, or 242', of the collapse of WTC 7' facade, and determined that it took 5.4 seconds, yet he claims that the entire 610' collapse only took ~6.5 seconds. Did the other 368' fall in just over 1 second? How is he even able to give us a time for the entire visible portion of the collapse when NIST couldn't because buildings in the foreground blocked the view of video cameras?
    How could the towers have free fallen when the loose, airborne debris from their upper stories was falling so much faster than the collapse zones, and began hitting the ground while at least 40 stories in each were still intact? Was g increased on 9/11? They fell in ~15 and ~22 seconds respectively, nowhere near the ~9.25 seconds free fall would have taken:


    yet he begins every presentation with his near free-fall claim. He's also claimed that the dust clouds from the collapses were pyroclastic, but there are no reports of anyone's skin being instantly peeled off, and he's claimed that the fires in WTC 7 were minor, totally contradicting these NYC eyewitnesses:


    How could his claim that 400,000 yards of concrete were turned to fine powder be true, when there was <100,000 yards of concrete above grade in both towers combined? Does he know how to turn 400,000 yards of concrete to fine powder with explosives without leveling NYC?
    Has he ever seen a controlled demolition that left molten metal in the debris for months? Has he ever seen one that didn't leave even one explosively-cut column in the debris? Since he claims that explosives were planted in the core columns to start the collapses, and that it was done from elevators shafts, has he ever looked a floor plan of the cores above the 78th floor sky lobby? There were only 6 regular elevators above there, plus a freight and 2 express elevators, and they were only near 6 of the 47 core columns. Several of those were in the paths of the planes, and the perimeter columns collapsed first, so his “theory” doesn't even make sense, especially considering the fact that 3- or more stories of core framing stood 15-25 seconds after each tower's main collapse was over.
    We should investigate Richard Gage, as well as his “engineers.”


    • Listen Albury, I don't know where you get your facts and in the interest of this argument I will even grant you the stats you cite. Why do you have such a difficult time considering the “crazy” possibility that these buildings were a controlled demolition? What are you so afraid of? So maybe he got the freefall time wrong and maybe he got the amount of steel and concrete wrong (remember I'm granting you your stats) that still doesn't get around the essential facts that a) no modern steel/concrete highrise has never collapsed due to fire b) the heat of the airplane fuel and the fires weren't enough to melt the steel in the tower that supposedly weakened it before the fall and molten steel and iron was found in the footprint during the clean up c) the fall of the towers themselves are picture perfect images of a controlled demolition d) traces of controlled demolition material Thermite were found on the site e) first hand accounts of explosions in the sub-basement of the two towers were reported seconds before the planes struck the towers.

      With all due respect, your focus on amounts of concrete and free fall speeds will not discredit Mr. Gage and again I have to wonder why you're so afraid of considering what he's proposing. Do you honestly believe that history is what we've been told it is? Do you honestly trust the government to the degree that everything they say is true? That they have the people's best interests in mind? It's really ok to question the reality we're told to believe. The important thing is to look at the facts and check in with yourself honestly and objectively and ask if it makes sense.

      • Gage is a liar and a total incompetent, and his misrepresentation of collapse times is only one of many problems I have with him. If any WTC building had been demolished with explosives, there would have been hundreds of explosively-severed columns found in the rubble, so either the ~40,000 people who worked at Ground Zero were “in on” your fantasy, or it never happened. There is also no even remotely plausible motive for it, unless you think owning or leasing ~20 acres of debris and going nine years without any cash flow is better than collecting from tenants and not being faced with almost $10 billion in obligatory rebuilding costs, while still paying ~$10 million a month to the Port Authority in rent. The US would certainly have retaliated with troops whether the buildings had come down or not, and should have done it after the Cole SUICIDE attack, or after the two US embassy SUICIDE bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam.
        The tower collapses looked nothing at all like C/Ds, since the upper perimeter columns failed first and debris scattered over a large area, destroying 4 other WTC buildings, starting major fires in another that eventually collapsed it, and destroying or damaging another half dozen or more nearby structures. The outer tower columns were more than halfway outside the buildings and in plain sight, covered only by insulation and 1/10″ aluminum brake metal on the outside, and directly-applied lightweight gypsum plaster on the inside, so secretly planting and detonating explosives on them would literally have been impossible.
        The “accounts of explosions” came from one profiteering crackpot who's now touring the world and making a fast buck on al Qaeda's 9/11 atrocity, and if they had really been explosives destroying the structure, why didn't everyone in the North Tower and outside hear them? Why did it collapse from the 95th floor down? What held it up for 1 hour and 42 minutes? He's also claimed that a secret, high-powered microwave weapon brought down UA 93 over Shanksville, PA, so you may find that believable too, and his web site instructs on how to donate to him if you're interested.
        There was no melting of steel prior to the collapses, and nothing known to mankind collapses hi-rises and then keeps steel molten for months, but debris fires did account for molten metal. The only discovery made from the dust samples was that sulfur, rust, aluminum, silicon, and some other common materials were present, and that it “reminded” someone of nanothermite. They also claimed that it was painted on the columns and detonated, so what are you afraid of? Get some of it, paint it on some steel columns, and demonstrate that “theory.” The idea that the concrete was all turned to dust is absurd, but show us how that's done with explosives or incendiaries too.
        If you really want to know what caused the 9/11 WTC collapses, read NCSTAR 1 and 1A.

        • wow. I think you need to sit down and have a nice refreshing seltzer. It sounds like you're about to bust a vein over this.

          You start off your last post calling Gage a liar and an incompetent yet all your information you present is not backed up by any sources. Cite them if you can. Gage has 1244 professional architects and engineers who've signed on to his petition asking for a re-investigation into the events of 9-11. I suppose you're going to say that 1244 professional architects and engineers are all part of a conspiracy. But let me respond to your last post.

          Your claim that if the towers were controlled demolitions there'd be more 'explosively severed columns' demonstrates your lack of understanding of controlled demolitions and hardly is a reason to dismiss the possibility of c.d. Your claim that the collapses didn't look like a c.d. are your own and very subjective coming from someone who doesn't do c.d. for a living. I'll listen to an architect or engineer regarding what a c.d. looks like thank you very much. Your attempt to discredit claims of explosions by calling the claims as coming from a 'crackpot' are, again, your claims and I'd like to see your source for this belief. I remember seeing interviews with security and people in or near the towers talking about being rocked by explosions that felt like they were coming from the basement. They were first hand accounts. Were they telling the truth? I don't know but I trust them more than your defensive claims. I don't know about UA-93. What happened to that flight in Shanksville, I have not a clue and don't claim to know. I deal with facts and evidence. You say debris fires kept the steel molten for months? Are you joking? You must be. Again, jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. You're telling me to get some thermite and paint it on steel and activate it? Yeah, thanks but no thanks. Even if I could get my hands on some, which I doubt I could since I believe it's sold under very strict guidelines, I wouldn't know how to work with it. I have no need to injure myself to prove something.

          You asked what the motivation is for collapsing the towers. Well, first of all, I still have no clue who did it. Since I don't believe the official story, I'm not sure who's behind the whole thing and I'm not going to jump to conclusions either. It could've been Bush and his crew or it could've been Obama for all I know or the banking cartels, the illuminati or maybe it really was Al Qaeda. I'm just saying the evidence is there to call bullshit on the official story. Beyond that I'm at a loss. But, possible motivations….well look at what's happened the past 9 years. We've been in a state of constant war. That certainly benefits banks and arms companies. That could be a motivation. There's oil in the Gulf, that could be a motivation. I don't know what the reason was but there's alot of reasonable motivations.

          I'll check out NCSTAR1 and 1A if you check out http://www.ae911truth.org/resources/35-key-fact

          • 1244 alleged professional architects and engineers are a tiny percentage of just the ASCE, and here's an example of their level of competence:
            If you don't realize that columns are severed in C/Ds, and that the sounds of cutter or shaped charges carry for miles, not a few feet, you the one with a lack of understanding of controlled demolitions. There were more than 230 structural engineers, scientists, and other experts involved in the NIST investigations, most with doctorates and more than 65% from the private sector, yet you're willing to dismiss their work without even looking at it. I'm also wondering how well you can read, since I never said that there was molten steel in the debris, but molten metal was reported many weeks after the collapses, and the debris fires were hardly a secret to anyone who was there. If you think thermite does that, you've never seen it burn. It would be at room temperature within hours.
            The loud sounds heard during the fires didn't occur immediately before any collapse, weren't heard from more than a block or two away, didn't come from anywhere near the areas where the collapses started, and were almost definitely shorted transformers, partial floor collapses, debris dropping from great height in utility and express elevator shafts, BLEVEs, flashovers, backdrafts, and other common phenomena in large office fires, not your imaginary, fireproof explosives. The majority of the witnesses who reported them were FDNY, and few of them are in your 9/11 “truth movement,” so they're either not as smart as you are, or don't care what killed hundreds of their friends and relatives.
            If you can't get some of this miracle substance and show us how it works on steel columns and concrete, why don't you contact some of Gage's “engineers” and ask them to do it? If it really does keep steel molten for months, I want to be the first in my neighborhood to get a boiler that uses it, so I don't have to keep buying fuel oil.
            There was motivation to plant ~600 kg of high explosives in a truck and detonate it in a lower parking level in 1993, but that didn't even damage one column, so the same group tried something else. There was no motivation for the impossible planting of explosives in the upper floors of the towers to augment the plane and fire damage, but this was the motivation for flying hijacked planes into them:


            Those are the people you're exculpating with your nonsense, while you're libeling others who had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

    • correction: “…30 or more stories of core framing stood 15-25 seconds after each tower's main collapse was over.”

    • Your so cute | Aug 8, 2010 at 8:22 pm |

      lol… hmm if your right which you maybe. Why are you wasting your time trying to disprove him? If your right then stand strong in your belief. It sounds like to me your worried about something 😉

  4. Airplanes with full tanks of jet fuel crashed into the top of two skyscrapers, completely engulfing the top floors and turning them into a melting furnace. So what does physics tell these architects and enginners? Where will this engulfing, melting furnace go?

    Straight down, geniuses.

    I don't know what the “general” consensus is, but I think the 911 Truth Community is a bunch of paranoid, over the hill, attention seeking geeks. They wonder why no one is listening to them? Well becuz they are making no sense and making claims that are just way too sensational.. even for sensationalists!

    • I agree with most of what you said, TC, but the 767s that hit the towers were carrying ~10,000 gallons of fuel at takeoff, which is about half of capacity, and the NIST report doesn't claim that any steel melted to cause a collapse. The only ones making that claim are in the 9/11 “truth movement.”

    • your so cute | Aug 8, 2010 at 8:34 pm |

      oh just stop it….Everyone is listening!!!! THEY ARE MAKING SENSE!!! and i rather be sensationally engored then flacid.

  5. isnotrealitrue | Aug 12, 2010 at 8:30 am |

    bollyn.com beatcheaz

  6. isnotrealitrue | Aug 12, 2010 at 3:30 am |

    bollyn.com beatcheaz

Comments are closed.