Media Complicity in Financial Crimes



When you connect the dots in your writing or look for deeper explanations behind the decisions of policymakers, marketmakers and media-makers, it’s easy to be dismissed as a conspiracy nut.

But forgive me for believing that those who serve interests have more clout that those that just speak out on issues.  There are hidden relationships that sometimes predetermine what stories get media attention and which do not.

I have a current film out, Plunder: The Crime of Our Time, taking on big media companies to task for what passes for coverage of the financial crisis. I have been asking why they weren’t paying attention, didn’t warn us about it, or investigate too deeply into how it happened.

When I discovered that dodgy lenders and credit card companies pumped more than $3 billion into media advertising that inflated the housing bubble between 2002 and 2007, I thought I had my answer.

Based on my own experience inside news networks, I could see that investigating advertisers in a tough economic climate was not exactly high on the agenda. It happens, but rarely.

Yet even I, as savvy as I thought I was, missed an important link that was hidden in plain sight—who owns the very media institutions I was railing against.

Guess what: many owners are the very financial institutions that should have been exposed. Media is a business tied into other businesses and driven by interlocking directorates by a not so invisible umbilical chord.

It took a a colleague, Barry James Dyke, author of Pirates of Manhattan to give me a little guided online tour into this reality via Yahoo’s Finance Site. It’s easy to access but usually only used by investors, not investigative journalists like myself.

I am not a stranger to corporate media ownership issues. Our Mediachannel even did a chart some years back showing how handful of media giants owned most of the channels on broadcast and cable outlets.

What we didn’t do then is what Barry Dyke was showing me how to discover: who owns those same companies.

Its all there, clearly available in easy to read charts to help you see how their stock is doing, On the left side of the chart, there is a section to click on called OWNERSHIP.

In the flash of a click, there is a display of who owns the company I used to work for: ABC News. This information is mandated by laws designed to insure accountability and protect investors.

The first category is  “Major Direct Holders.” At the top of the list is a former ABC News exec Robert A. Iger who owns 850, 790 shares. Under him are other biggies who were given or helped to buy stock, allegedly to incentivize them. These holdings complement and add to their already generous salaries.

In truth, its all a form of looting of shareholder value. Often these execs have more clout than the boards of directors they theoretically report to. Sometimes, it only takes a small percentage of shares to wield control. Together these insiders and what are called 5% owners own 7% of Disney with disproportionate influence.

The next category on the chart is Institutional and Mutual Fund owners.  They control 68%. And who are they? Fidelity, State Street Corporation, JP Morgan Chase and Company, Price T Rowe Associates etc etc.

The next category is “Top Mutual Fund holders” with the Fidelity Contra Fund owning 1.2 BILLION in holdings, more than 36 million shares.   In all l095, institutions own shares. But a few are more equal than others. The role that these largely unaccountable mutual funds play is rarely examined. Just listing their holdings doesn’t explore their influence.

Some mutual funds get an added benefit—access to employee retirement withholdings. So they are not just funding Disney but being funded by it with a guaranteed income stream even though the Funds often do not perform well.

Explains Barry Dyke, it’s about control, “mutual fund companies get other peoples money through payroll deductions on their 401(k)s, and those fund companies, and the funds they control, own large  stakes in companies like Disney.

Through lobbying, essentially with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, employers are exempt from liability-fiduciary responsiblity as long as they  use a mutual fund, a target date mutual fund more specifically. So employers

are exempt from liability, mutual fund companies are exempt from liability  from the get-go, and do a lousy job of looking out for shareholders.” What he means here is there returns have been low—and many have blown up.

Back on our list, there follows  “insider transactions.” Some of the information is considered N/A—Not available. Why is that?

I was at ABC News, and available, when Disney swooped in to buy the company in 1995 for $19 billion. It had been for sale for $11 billion just two years earlier. The deal was the largest media merger in history to that point and the second largest sum of money ever paid for a U.S. company.

Back in l940, Walt Disney had first sold stock to lower the debt. The newer Disney took on billions in debt to finance its deals. Where did the money come from?

Why, no surprise, the Wall Street banks and financial institutions they work with. Call it synergy, but not of a kind that leads to better programming or media responsibility.

The final phase out of ABC occurred at a final shareholders meeting I attended in a New York TV studio on January 4 1996.  I wrote about it in my book, The More You Watch The Less You Know, noting that the vote to sell the company to the “Mouse House” (and, in the process, enrich its shareholders) passed by a vote of 121 million to 437,000. It was only after the deal was done that questions from the floor were permitted.

So much for corporate democracy.  I managed to get a question in—called on as “the man in the back of the room.” It annoyed my bosses.

I asked the former Chairman of Capital Cities, the first company to acquire ABC and then ABC’s departing leader, if he was “concerned” about what the merger would mean for our democracy. (One of Cap Cities’ founders and principals was the nefarious Iran-Contra conspirator William Casey who became Ronald Reagan’s secretive CIA Director.)

There was no concern about my concern. My question was ridiculed and dismissed by Chairman Tom Murphy who said,  “Am I concerned. No, I am not concerned.” Murphy had earlier told Charlie Rose that he enjoyed winning. He was asked what that meant to him. “Making money” was his response. “Whoever makes the most wins. That’s how we keep score.”

In sharp contrast, media historian Robert McChesney was concerned, very concerned, writing later:” A specter now haunts the world: a global commercial media system dominated by a small number of superpowerful, mostly U.S.-based transnational media corporations. It is a system that works to advance the cause of the global market and promote commercial values, while denigrating journalism and culture not conducive to the immediate bottom line or long-run corporate interests. It is a disaster for anything but the most superficial notion of democracy–a democracy where, to paraphrase John Jay’s maxim, those who own the world ought to govern it.”

Disney went on to acquire more stations. Their network now includes 200 affiliated stations reaching nearly 100% of all U.S. television and 277 radio outlets at last count. And they publish books, magazines, and financial and medical services information. The journalism they offer has noticeably declined.

Just one recent example:  towards the end of August, ABC News reported on new credit card rules, dryly reciting the new disclosures mandated in the new “reform” law. They did not mention that nothing was done to cap interest rates or, as the Wall Street Journal reported the next day, the banks and credit card companies had jacked up the rates despite the flagging economy and the fact they can borrow money at record low rates.

Why was that? Could it have anything to do with the interests of those who own Disney, ABC’s parent company? You tell me. (Disney, by the by, offers its own credit card.)

Media companies always insist no one tells them what to do, with Fox News perhaps the most glaring and candid exception, considering Rupert Murdoch’s ideological leash. Even as the Nets cover the money in politics that buys laws and rents politicians, they insist no one ever influences their coverage decisions—not investors, not advertisers, and certainly, not viewers.

Obama, it is said, did Wall Street’s bidding because of all the money they shmeared on his campaign. But do the companies that own and control media with billions at stake have any say in what does and does not get in the news?


Filmmaker and News Dissector Danny Schechter edits
For more on his film Plunder: The Crime of Our Time and companion book The Crime of our Time, visit

13 Comments on "Media Complicity in Financial Crimes"

  1. Funny to me how with one breath, Disinfo's all like, “check it out, yo: corporations are eeevil. corporations want to, like, take over the world and shit, and we gots to stop 'em.”

    Then with the next breath, Disinfor's all like, “buy our merch, dawg: we gots books and stickers and t-shirts and gimcracks with our impish devil head logo. And don't forget to click our Google Adsense banners, dawg, cuz Domino's Pizza has a two-for-one sale to feed all y'all who worked up a sweat raging against the machine.

    “And most of all, Dawg, read Disinfo's terms of use:

    Terms And Conditions Of Use

    Your use of this site by story submission, story commenting and any other use of material hosted on this site indicates your acceptance of the following Terms and Conditions of Use of the disinformation® site at and any other linked website(s) owned and operated by The Disinformation Company Ltd. (referred to as “TDC”). These terms and conditions are subject to change without warning, so please review them regularly.

    General Liability Notice: The open nature of the site makes it impossible for TDC to vouch for the truth, accuracy or honesty of posts from individual contributors. We are not responsible for any stories or comments posted, nor the consequences of reading them. The views expressed in them are those of the authors, who accept total responsibility for the content of their posts. If you find any posts on this site to be offensive or objectionable, please contact us [link] with the address of the post. If we determine that removal of a post or posts is necessary, we will make reasonable efforts to do so in a timely manner.

    General Warranty: TDC will make every effort to ensure the proper operation of the website servers, website software, and the Internet connection to these servers, but cannot guarantee availability. TDC will make every effort to provide a free and open content environment within the boundaries of the Terms and Conditions that does not contain disruptive, abusive, or threatening stories or comments, but cannot guarantee that all such posts will be found and removed within any specific timeframe.

    Registration: When you register for our site, the only requirement is a functioning email address to confirm your registration. Your site password will be sent to the address you specify. Your email address will also be subscribed to our email newsletter service for which you can unsubscribe if you wish. The address you provide will never be shared with any other party as specified in our Privacy Policy.

    Content that violates these terms and conditions are subject to action that may include, but is not limited to, edits, removal, or account termination.

    By posting comments, submitting stories or otherwise contributing content to this site you agree to the following:

    1. Posting: You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered from this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.

    2. Offensive Content: You will not post links to images or use avatars and signatures that are offensive, abusive, disruptive and/or hateful. You will not use images, avatars or link to images or domains that contain gore, mutilation, pornography or illegal content. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

    3. Obscenity: You will not use excessive profanity on our site, and will neither post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content. You will also not use common alternative spellings or net-speak alternative for profane words.

    4. Intellectual Property: You will not post any copyrighted material, material belonging to another person, material previously posted by you on another website nor link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution, as defined by TDC, to its original source. You will not use your postings to promote your own personal website or any other website with which you may be associated.

    5. Relevant Content: You will not post stories, comments or other content that are clearly outside of the topics featured on this site nor disrupt the site by deliberately posting repeated irrelevant comments or copies of identical comments (also known as “flooding”). TDC reserves the right to eliminate or edit any content deemed inappropriate for the site. TDC reserves the right to establish limits on topics that may be featured if, in its opinion, those topics attract an audience that is counterproductive to TDCs goals for the site as determined in its sole discretion.

    6. Spamming: You will not post identical content, or snippets of identical content, to multiple stories on the site.

    7. Language: The dominant language of our users and staff is English. In order to promote a smooth-running environment and fair enforcement of these Terms & Conditions, you agree not to post or chat in any language other than English.

    8. Video links/embeds: You will not embed or post a link to a video without a reasonable description of its content and why it interests you.

    9. False Content: In the event you post an item that is later determined to be an obvious hoax or of a fraudulent or faked nature, your account may be terminated without warning.

    10. Termination: This agreement is effective until terminated by either party. You may terminate this agreement at any time by no longer using or accessing this site and, if applicable, destroying all materials obtained from any and all TDC site(s) and all related documentation and all copies and installations thereof, whether made under the terms of this agreement or otherwise. This agreement will terminate immediately without notice from TDC if in TDC’s sole determination you fail to comply with any term or provision of this agreement. Upon termination, you must destroy all materials obtained from this site and any and all other TDC site(s) and all copies thereof, whether made under the terms of this agreement or otherwise. In the event your account or access privileges are terminated for any reason, your information and posts may be removed in TDC’s discretion. Requests for voluntary “account deletion” and removal of your content will not be honored without a reasonable reason, provided in writing, to TDC.

    11. Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful, intolerant, bigoted and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.

    12. Identity Spoofing: You will not impersonate any person or entity, forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any posting. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

    13. Hacking: You will not use this site for the purposes of sharing or distributing viruses, licenses, registration information, software keys, “cracks,” or other information designed to do harm to or allow unlawful access to any computer hardware, software, networks, or any other systems. You will also not link to sites that contains discussion of such material. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

    14. Multiple Accounts: You will not create multiple user accounts and “talk to yourself.”

    15. Content Copyright: By posting on this site, you relinquish all exclusive copyright privileges to the material you post and you grant TDC non-exclusive, non-revocable rights to publish your posts in perpetuity in all forms in any and all media now know or later invented. TDC has the authority to decide to display your postings or not, and modify your posts to remove offensive material, modify your post title to accurately reflect content, remove vulgar comments, remove insults or delete any other content deemed inappropriate, at TDC’s discretion.

    16. Content Distribution: You will not copy material from this site to post on other websites or quote in offline research in a manner that does not comply with the TDC Creative Commons License that specifies the author’s member name as a contributor to, includes The Disinformation Company Ltd. and the member as owners of the content, provides the title of the post, and a full URL for the story on this site.

    17. DMCA Enforcement: By posting on these domains, you grant TDC the right to seek enforcement and legal remedy for any and all discovered usage violations falling under the DMCA and the Creative Commons content deed. Remedy in such cases will always place a priority on proper attribution of you as the author and a link-back to your post (or posts), rather than removal.

    18. Advertising: You will not advertise or promote other discussion boards, chat systems, online communities or other websites on our site within posts, avatars or signatures without prior written permission from TDC. You will not choose a username that is the same as a website domain, subdomain, or URL for which you are associated. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

    19. Unauthorized Marketing: ATTENTION MARKETERS: You will not engage in efforts of viral or “stealth marketing” on this site without prior approval of TDC. If marketing activity for the promotion of any other commercial entity outside of this site is discovered you agree that you are responsible for paying TDC $20.00 US for each “thread view” of the thread(s) in which your marketing messages are contained. Your acceptance of these Terms & Conditions for contributing to this site signifies your approval of these payment terms.

    20. Ad Blockers: As our site is provided as a free service, in part through the income of our advertising, you agree not to use “ad-blocking” software or similar built-in web browser options designed to obfuscate or block online advertising while using the website(s).

    21. Personal Responsibilities: At all times, you agree to remain solely responsible for anything found within your comments, stories or other submissions and agree to indemnify and hold TDC, harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of any material you submit, post to or transmit through the site, your use of the site, your connection to the site, your violation of these terms and conditions, or your violation of the rights of another.

    22. Unauthorized Access: You will not attempt to access any protected sections of the site, nor make use of any hacks, cracks, bug exploits, etc. to bypass or modify the features of the site software or to obtain information beyond the allowed features of your account status. Doing so will result in immediate termination of your account.

    23. Cooperation: You will, if asked by a representative of TDC, cease posting any content, and/or links to content, deemed offensive, objectionable, or in poor taste by the representative.

    24. Disclaimer: This website does not and cannot review all of the content of every comment or story posted and does not accept responsibility for the contents. We reserve the right to delete any material and/or restrict posting rights for any reason whatsoever. Should you continue to post material that violates the rules of the site, your account may be terminated, your access to the site may be banned, and your service provider(s) may be contacted about your behavior. Furthermore, TDC expressly reserves the rights under the law to take any other actions deemed necessary.

    25. Disclosure: TDC also reserves the right to disclose any known personal information when required by law or in the good-faith belief that such action is necessary to conform to the law or comply with a legal process served on TDC, protect and defend the rights or property of the TDC domains, or visitors to these domains, identify persons who may be violating the law, the legal notice, or the rights of third parties, and cooperate with the investigations of purported unlawful activities.

    26. Neutrality: TDC provides a forum for highlighting and discussing a wide variety of subjects, but does not endorse any particular theory, opinion, viewpoint or position on any topic.


    28. Violation: Violation of any aspect of the Terms and Conditions of use are subject to immediate banning of your username/IP from the site and/or the removal of your email/password from the database. You agree that in all disputes of any type regarding any transgression or disagreement with the policies of TDC, the decisions of TDC are final.

    29. Jurisdictional Issues: Unless otherwise specified, the materials on the site are presented solely for the purpose of promoting its content and other TDC products in the United States, its territories, possessions and protectorates. This site is controlled and operated by TDC from its offices within the State of New York, United States of America. TDC makes no representation that materials on the site are appropriate or available for use in other locations. Those who choose to access this site from other locations do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with local laws, if and to the extent local laws are applicable.

    30. Limitation Of Liability: Under no circumstances, including, but not limited to, negligence, shall TDC be liable for any special or consequential damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials on this site, even if TDC or a TDC authorized representative has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Applicable law may not allow the limitation or exclusion of liability or incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you. In no event shall TDC’s total liability to you for all damages, losses and causes of action (whether in contract, tort (including, but not limited to, negligence), or otherwise) exceed the amount paid by you, if any, for accessing this site.

    31. Other: This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any principles of conflicts of law. If any provision of this agreement shall be unlawful, void or for any reason unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed severable from this agreement and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of any remaining provisions. This is the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter herein and may not be modified except by a written agreement signed by both parties. All claims, disputes or disagreements which may arise out of the interpretation, performance or breach of this agreement, or in any way relating to your use of this site and any and all other TDC site(s), shall be submitted exclusively to the jurisdiction of the State or federal courts located in the County and State of New York.

    • Even us pinko-commie-devil worshiping-s.o.b.'s need to eat and pay rent. we live in your bullshit capitalist society and our hands are forced to at least minimally comply if we want to survive. i'd rather Disinfo sell books that educate than bombs that eradicate.

    • Thanks for taking the time to read what's in the links at the bottom of the site. Hopefully you've had a chance to look at some of the other links.

      With your frequent advocacy of the free market, we'd think you'd believe there is room for a company like Disinformation in the grand marketplace of ideas … so uncertain what point you're trying to make.

      • He's just trying to insult and discourage those who are open to information that undermines his ideology, and provide easy routes of denial for those who share his ideology and stumble upon such information. In a way it's a kind of psy-op.

    • Well…I'm just glad you finally found the TOS. It appears that, in the absence of an actual point, you've just posted this to harp on the irony of people supporting a website by selling things while bitching about gigantic financial institutions using their influence to reduce the severity of negative media coverage.

      Unfortunately…your sense of irony needs a trip to the shop for a tune-up. Irony can be found more easily in a situation where, for instance, a proponent and defender of neo-con financial policy lashes out against anyone engaging in capitalism as a means of support…because the topic at hand is unquestionably evidence that the end result of his believed in and ballyhooed policies is collusion and improper influence over media.

    • The corporate press is exercising propaganda. Notice the article is critical of the corporate press. Do you really think the corporate press would be critical of itself and expose its agenda. Get real.

  2. Liam_McGonagle | Aug 30, 2010 at 10:40 am |

    Yeah, media concentration in the hands of fiancial speculators is a big part of it. But don't let Joe Q. Public off the hook too easily either. The fact is, as a culture we've become lazier than sh*t. If it doesn't come prepackaged in cancer-causing plastics so that we can shove it in our maws within a quarter of the time it'd take to preheat the oven, it just won't sell. People want quick, passive solutions.

    High maintenance phenom like Democracy aren't too popular, especially with the Tea Bagger crowd. Much easier, simpler for them to stand around with big empty grins and wave flags while they surrender our Constitutional Rights instead of taking the trouble to actually read the Constitution.

    Then of course there's “geniuses”, the likes of which I don't have to mention by name here, who squander what little brain power they may have been born with trying to craft apologia for the traitors like Grover Norquist and Richard Rahn who have vowed to replace American Liberty with Corporate Serfdom. How's about that for 'Service with a Smile'?

    Ah, it's a mad, mad world.

  3. Every news has it's slant, but a hidden slant in favor of commercial interests makes for crap news. Plus there's a bunch of trivial news stories that gets created to entertain the masses, but aren't really news.
    Some of the government news (eg, Canadian CBC news) has less of a slant, but it's not perfect neither.
    If ever you want to know what kind of slant is in your news, compare the coverage from different news sources – sometimes it's so different it's entertaining. Also checkout non-American news sites for coverage of American news – it can be pretty different too.

  4. It's a well established truth that media conglomerates inevitably move to direct coverage in ways that maximize ad sales…which is the backbone of their income. What I like here is that Mr Schechter has done a nice job of illustrating how close the actual physical links between Wall St and big media have really become. Project Censored exists for this very reason…because a purely for profit driven media by its very nature cannot adequately serve the public interest unless it constantly monitors itself for bias and adjusts accordingly…and ours makes very little effort to deliver unbiased information (be it left or right…it all winds up filtered through the lens of 'How will this affect us financially.”) Pushing relentlessly to expose major media as grossly biased…and keeping alternative media sources alive and operational…is the soul of the struggle to rebuild and maintain now failing systems that were once at least semi-competent at delivering information.

  5. myth_slayer | Aug 30, 2010 at 8:27 pm |

    I applaud Mr. D's excellent article.

    I am not taking issue with anything he said, but wish to respectfully simplify something (sorry for being repititious).

    The way it works: some foundation, think tank, phony poll or phony wire service, trust, astro-turf outfit, etc., owned by either Peter G. Peterson or David Koch (it has become most transparent of late that it is either one or the other of these two jackhole billionaires) spews forth some nonsense nonissue of no content, and the five or six media-owning corporations directs their “news” outlets to churn this crapola over and over and over.

    Or, if on occasion something like a real story accidentally creeps in the news (e.g., warrentless wiretapping), then Spanish-language radio stations (owned by Peterson's Blackstone Group) will organize nattion-wide immigration marches to knock it off the front pages.

    They really do manipulate the eff out of everything.

  6. Before Bush Jr became Resident at the White House the media has always said waterboarding was torture. Since Bush Jr began using waterboarding the media stopped regarding waterboarding as torture.

    The media's first black eye was the coverage of the Vietnam war. Most people still believe that it was south vs north Vietnam war when it wasn't. The real reason for the war was this: The United States did not want an election in that country because they knew Ho Chi Min would win easily. To prevent the election from ever happening the United States entered the country and started killing Vietnamese period. That's right it didn't matter if you were south or north you were Vietnamese and you were a target. The idea was if Vietnam wanted an election they would have to kick the Americans out of the country. This message is what the U.S media did not want to report.

    The Pentagon Papers let the cat out of the bag.

    The media conned the people into thinking they had an objective media when the Nixon crime was reported. But that objectivity quickly ended. Since then the media has been a self censored piece of crap pushing the Conservative agenda of rule by money and power only.

    The irony? The American Revolution brought us Freedom of the Press and this very press is turning lying to the people, hence making the Revolution pointless. Meet the new boss same as the old boss.

  7. He’s just trying to insult and discourage those who are open to information that undermines his ideology, and provide easy routes of denial for those who share his ideology and stumble upon such information. In a way it’s a kind of psy-op.

  8. regvr

    Luxurious Fendi Replica Designer Handbags are beautiful and elegant. Being made of supple and sumptuous high quality leather, superior exquisite craftsmanship, Fendi fake designer handbags are subtle and sheen. While the high quality material are so solid that Fendi wholesale designer handbags on sale are practical functionality and lifetime durability. You can choose to wear high quality replica Fendi handbags at different occasions. you will be amazed to find numerous gorgeous knockoff handbags . We only supply timeless replica Fendi handbags that never go out of fashion. Stylish, chic yet spacious cheap designer handbags will be fashion handbags. All designer replica Fendi handbags can reach the level of the authentic Fendi handbags. Fendi was founded in 1918 as a fur and leather shop in Rome. Fendi is an Italian fashion house best known for its “baguette” handbags, but today it is a multinational luxury goods brand owned by LVMH.

Comments are closed.