DARPA Seeking Small Business Partners To Develop Robots

800px-DARPA_LogoHard to believe that DARPA is feeling the pinch as Obama’s never-ending wars push our national debt to unimaginable levels, but apparently they need help. Report from Fast Company:

Back in July the government identified robots as one of the R&D priorities for the 2012 budget (about a decade behind the rest of us). Now there’s a research funding round to aid small business robotic’s efforts, to build robot gear DARPA can’t manage.

The Office of Science and Technology Policy was behind July’s thinking that “Robotics is an important technology because of its potential to advance national needs such as homeland security, defense, medicine, healthcare, space exploration,” and a whole list of other purposes. The OSTP thinks it’s also a tech at “a tipping point in terms of its usefulness and versatility,” thanks to innovations in programming, hardware, and computer vision.

Now the White House has announced that five federal agencies have banded together to create a fund to spur “small business research.” Companies can apply for cash to aid work on “robot-assisted rehabilitation, robotics for drug discovery, and robots that can disarm explosive devices.” This last one is particularly revealing, given how much the U.S. armed forces are relying on robotics in the current expeditionary missions, and how much improvised explosive weapons are inflicted disaster in Afghanistan and Iraq (with a side-order of worries about similar terrorist threats at home).

DARPA, of course, sets out guidelines about the kind of robots its funds: They must have “novel actuators that exceed the safety and efficacy of human muscle,” which is a no-brainer–why would anyone build a defense bot that is weaker than a person? The actuators must be safe, extremely powerful, and robust–also no-brainers. They must also have designs that “do not rely on exotic or expensive materials or processes” and have potential for “low-cost manufacturing.”

And here’s the truth behind all this, hinted at by BotJunkie’s post on the news. Official government funding on robotics and general science and tech for decades, including billions of unaccountable “black project” cash, hasn’t developed robotics swiftly enough to meet modern requirements. There’s a ton of clever work in the bag, certainly, but it’s either too expensive or too unreliable to quickly turn into workable robots that can help the U.S.’s war efforts as well as engineering tasks back home. So the government has opened the cash pool to small businesses…

[continues at Fast Company]

, , ,

  • ALL Governments LIE

    “….as Obama’s never-ending wars push our national debt to unimaginable levels”

    WTF are you talking about? Those are “Dubya’s” wars. Shrub should be tried for treason for all that he did!

    • emperorreagan

      Bush may have started them, but you can’t let Obama off the hook for continuing them.

      The rationale for going was bullshit and the rationale for continuing them is bullshit.

      And the promise that the US is going to get out is bullshit, the US is going to be maintaining an enormous military presence in both countries for the foreseeable future.

    • Andrew

      Nor does Obama’s guilt in any way absolve Bush. What’s wrong for the goose is wrong for the gander.

  • ALL Governments LIE

    “….as Obama’s never-ending wars push our national debt to unimaginable levels”

    WTF are you talking about? Those are “Dubya’s” wars. Shrub should be tried for treason for all that he did!

  • Liam_McGonagle

    I’m writing my senator right now to lobby for a special tax incentive for developers of the first viable robot mercenary slaughter chip to override Asimov’s first two “Laws of Robotics”. The U.S.A. not only can, not only should, but MUST be the leader in production of top quality robot assassins.

    • IRONADDICT06

      Yes! I want to see the terminator.

  • Anonymous

    I’m writing my senator right now to lobby for a special tax incentive for developers of the first viable robot mercenary slaughter chip to override Asimov’s first two “Laws of Robotics”. The U.S.A. not only can, not only should, but MUST be the leader in production of top quality robot assassins.

  • emperorreagan

    Bush may have started them, but you can’t let Obama off the hook for continuing them.

    The rationale for going was bullshit and the rationale for continuing them is bullshit.

    And the promise that the US is going to get out is bullshit, the US is going to be maintaining an enormous military presence in both countries for the foreseeable future.

  • IRONADDICT06

    Yes! I want to see the terminator.

  • Andrew

    Nor does Obama’s guilt in any way absolve Bush. What’s wrong for the goose is wrong for the gander.

21