What in the World Are They Spraying?

What would you say if you were told that airplanes were regularly spraying toxic aerosols in the skies above every major region of the world? That is exactly what a group of protestors were claiming outside of the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting that was held in San Diego from February 18-22.

However, inside the convention center was a different story. The scientists gathered to discuss the “plausibility” of implementing various Geo-engineering campaigns throughout the world, all under the guise that the Earth has a man-made global warming problem that can be solved in-part by spraying aerosol aluminum and other particles into the sky to block the sun.

When these scientists were asked about the possibility of existing aerosol programs; they stated that no aerosol spraying programs have been implemented to date. A little confused? Why would protestors gather outside of a meeting making claims that world-wide aerosol programs were under way if scientist were only now discussing the possibility of implementing these programs? Could it be that one of these groups is being deceived?

The legendary author, filmmaker, and founder of Freedom Force International, G. Edward Griffin, will be in Atlanta on October 23rd, along with with directorsPaul Wittenberger and Mike Murphy, for the world premiere of their new film What In The World Are They Spraying?

All proceeds go toward establishing G. E. Griffin’s new Coalition Against Geo-Engineering. Please consider donating if you find this to be a worthy cause. For more info on the What In The World Are They Spraying? please visit truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com.

, , , , ,

  • Anonymous

    They didn’t say they were spraying anything. They were saying it’s possible to do it. Clearly the author lacks the mental capacity to make that distinction.

  • ntolman

    They didn’t say they were spraying anything. They were saying it’s possible to do it. Clearly the author lacks the mental capacity to make that distinction.

    • stormshadow

      Did you actually pay attention to the video? Or were you pondering a plate of cheesy nachos while watching the video. Maybe yo should watch it again, without pondering the nachos, and apologize for your errant post

      • ntolman

        No one admitted to spraying anything. Saying that something could be done is not the same as saying it’s already being done.

        • STORMSHADOW

          listen, its late and i want to go to bed. i will say this one more time. the entire premise of the article is stating that some are saying the technology is feasible but not occuring. But other people are saying that it IS in fact occuring right now. who to believe is whats at stake goddamn it! the fact that some are denying the spraying is not in question. you seem to be forgetting that some folks are saying otherwise. please clarify that this makes sense to you. as you are giving me a superior headache. and a craving for nachos.

          • ntolman

            Because the ones that say say it is occurring are fucking morons. Just because idiot hippies protest something doesn’t mean it’s reality.

          • ntolman

            If they are so certain that Monsanto is spreading aluminum around via aerosol and it’s causing the problems mentioned then it should be no problem to sue them for damages.

          • stormshadow

            Maybe the people on the ground are fucking morons, they do seem to fit the profile. maybe the people who are denying it are liars, they also seem to fit the profile. I dont know who is right and who is wrong, but the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. i never came out on either side, i was simply pointing out the difference of opinion which your first two posts did not recognize. As to the ease of suing monsanto that you speak of. a little naive here i think. it is never quite so easy to sue a multi billion dollar corp. not impossible, but certainly not “no problem”.

          • ntolman

            I’m sorry I was so angry earlier. The thing is the hypothesis put forth doesn’t make much sense to me. My problem is we have people who have no real understanding of science saying that it can’t be anything else other than aerosol spray.

            I like Monsanto is pretty evil as far as corporations go but I don’t even think they are evil enough to intentionally cause a problem so they can fix it.

          • Nano_Thermite_911

            ntolman, how is it that you feel adequately prepared to criticize a film you’ve not yet seen in it’s entirety?
            If you had actually seen the film or done any research ( I know it takes time and energy to learn new things) then you would realize the absurdity of your statement. The film is primarily compromised of showing SCIENTIFIC evidence supporting that this phenomenon is in fact happening. It raises questions that deserve answers.

            Why are so many people so unwilling to consider that Governments are capable of acts of malicious destruction to suit their nefarious ends. Isn’t that a large portion of what we call history??

            If you want to know about the SCIENTIFIC evidence please feel free to read the above post or visit realityzone.com or any of the other numerous web-sites documenting this phenomenon. You will find them chock full of SCIENTIFIC evidence.

          • westworld

            People do not want to believe in malevolent actions by Governments because it destroys their construct of humanity and therefore their life. To raise these kinds questions is a terrifying prospect which is why they are are received with such passionate antagonism. We think that we are more evolved in the Western “First World” nations and think that we transcend the affections for greed and power. This, unfortunately, is not the case, we are just more sophisticated at covering up our true agenda. The bigger the affront to our sensibilities the more likely we are to disbelieve. That is why the outrage has been so timid on matters such as Oil Wars, Haliburton, GM foods, Global Warming, The Federal Reserve, US torture, etc.. People who think we are so different from other “less evolved” nations are sadly deluded. We are not much different in the way we treat each others than the corrupt African States. We just go about things differently. In a way they are more honest and open in their brutality. We are just better at public relations.

          • Nano_Thermite_911

            My sentiments exactly. Well said westworld!

          • WTF IS GOING ON

            I seen the movie and it scares the shit out of me! I have two kids and to think that this is something they will have to deal with in the future is an awful thought. In the movie at one of the geo science meetings on scientist state that they haven’t tested the efects of aluminum on the enviroment and it won’t effect us right now but we may be riding on the curtails of our grandkids. This coming from a guy that is probably not married with no kids and all he cares about is science and a fat paycheck from Monsanto no doubt. For someone to think our government would not do this to their citizens is very naive which in the past has admitted to giving syphilis to African Americans in the fifties just to see the full affect of the disease not to mention the unspeakable thing they did to Native Americans way back when. Companys like Monsanto and Conagra have huge influences on our government and can do pretty much anything they want to. Another good movie is Food Inc. It shows exactly how much power these companys do have. I feel there is not much I can do to stop any atrocities agains humanity but it only took 5% of our population to send the British back to the big island. Now im not saying saying to go join your local militia but we do need to stand up and make some noise so if it is not true someone can debunk it. I am surprised that the media hasn’t gave it any coverage not even Glenn Beck the king conspiracy. I come from a long line of farmers from Oklahoma and I know for a fact that the last four of five years my familys crops have been struggling and it hasn’t been from lack of rain. GOD HELP US!!

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BSSLYD2M7DGRVAZ4YJBAREXR4Q Jack

            Lay off the weed and maybe you won’t have the munchies for nachos.

  • stormshadow

    Did you actually pay attention to the video? Or were you pondering a plate of cheesy nachos while watching the video. Maybe yo should watch it again, without pondering the nachos, and apologize for your errant post

  • Anonymous

    No one admitted to spraying anything. Saying that something could be done is not the same as saying it’s already being done.

  • STORMSHADOW

    listen, its late and i want to go to bed. i will say this one more time. the entire premise of the article is stating that some are saying the technology is feasible but not occuring. But other people are saying that it IS in fact occuring right now. who to believe is whats at stake goddamn it! the fact that some are denying the spraying is not in question. you seem to be forgetting that some folks are saying otherwise. please clarify that this makes sense to you. as you are giving me a superior headache. and a craving for nachos.

  • Anonymous

    Because the ones that say say it is occurring are fucking morons. Just because idiot hippies protest something doesn’t mean it’s reality.

  • Anonymous

    If they are so certain that Monsanto is spreading aluminum around via aerosol and it’s causing the problems mentioned then it should be no problem to sue them for damages.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    Spent a childhood with a pilot for a dad…who flew everything from C-130s, A-37s, A-10s…down to Cessna and Piper small craft…including most planes in between…(as well as an antique WW1 biplane and a few restored WW2 fighters). Anyway…whole life around officers, commercial and military pilots, men with security clearances up the wazoo…

    …all of this from the 60s to the 00s…and not a freaking whisper of hint about spraying anything…ever.

    There are lots of people on the ground with no relevant education to speak of…who look at a white line behind a jet…go to http://www.reallyreallybatshit.spankit.livinginfear.theyarecomingforussoon.com…and announce that its a government program to spray shit on us…despite the volume of planes involved and the complete lack of knowledge about this by the people who fly the planes.

    In a hundred years we may have found a cure for cancer…but I don’t think we’ll ever find the cures for gullible, stupid or crazy.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    Spent a childhood with a pilot for a dad…who flew everything from C-130s, A-37s, A-10s…down to Cessna and Piper small craft…including most planes in between…(as well as an antique WW1 biplane and a few restored WW2 fighters). Anyway…whole life around officers, commercial and military pilots, men with security clearances up the wazoo…

    …all of this from the 60s to the 00s…and not a freaking whisper of hint about spraying anything…ever.

    There are lots of people on the ground with no relevant education to speak of…who look at a white line behind a jet…go to http://www.reallyreallybatshit.spankit.livinginfear.theyarecomingforussoon.com…and announce that its a government program to spray shit on us…despite the volume of planes involved and the complete lack of knowledge about this by the people who fly the planes.

    In a hundred years we may have found a cure for cancer…but I don’t think we’ll ever find the cures for gullible, stupid or crazy.

    • ChemTrails For Lunch

      Have you seen the film? No. You have not. Also I don’t know if your dad flying planes is relevant education for analysing soil samples, soil samples that show conclusively a massive spike in incidence of Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium in our water, soil, and hair when sampled. Of course had you actually seen the movie (which again you have not) you would know this.

      So please explain to me again why you feel the need to paint anyone who holds a scientifically educated and informed opinion of this incredibly irresponsible and toxic experiment as being “gullible, stupid, or crazy”?

      As for Ntolman, obviously you are not actually listening to what is being said either. Thank you for StormShadow for correcting these offenses of logic.

      For those who want to know for themselves please view this film and support the movement to stop this horrific program.

      http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm
      http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

      • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

        Ok…watched the movie…the evidence is extremely not compelling, beyond associating industrial waste (that IS a problem) with air traffic. Sketchy assumptions based on partial science aimed at proving a spurious point at best…and again, the counter evidence is OVERWHELMING…almost crushing by any standard, scientific or otherwise. Likewise, the people espousing this are very nearly so fanatic that fraudulent claims is almost par for the course.

        Frankly…I’d suggest some time hanging with pilots, engineers, wingnuts (aircraft repairmen) and manufacturing linemen. First hand experience will teach you that there is no magic hidden box with toxic waste that no one noticed until now. From the fuel to the engines to the exhaust…its only ‘spooky creepy and unexplained’…if you know nothing about it…which is how gullibility applies perfectly. In the absence of serious understanding and familiarity, any claim no matter how weird looks completely legitimate.

        • Nano_Thermite_911

          Could you provide me with the link to the film you just watched.
          I’m curious where you found the movie in it’s entirety online.

          Also what do you say about the toxicology reports that have been correlated to the spraying witnessed throughout the world but especially Mt. Shasta in Northern California??

          Secondly can you provide links to any of the counter evidence you cite as being so self evident.

          Just because you allude to OVERWHELMING evidence doesn’t mean anything to me. Show some sources and scientific articles or you are obviously a troll.

          Peace.

          • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

            You invited me to watch…I watched…its directly above…push play and enjoy the failshow.

            Also…since the burden of proof rests on the people insisting that the improbable and unprovable is real, the troll is the whackjob who cites a collection of interviews backed by spooky music and pictures of the sky while a group of people of questionable credentials deliver emotionally charged quotes…and then insists that this has far more merit than the countless millions of people who design, build, maintain and operate military and civilian aircraft who inexplicably know nothing of this.

            Air Force brats who grow up next to a military air base, in the same town as an aviation school and a manufacturing plant (Duncan) can afford to doubt you as much as they please…because they have the experience and the familiarity that you don’t.

            But don’t let that stop you…familiarity and experience are booooring…its much more fun to sit in the dark and watch spooky videos and stare at the sky with dread and fear. Ignorance and snake oil are exciting and fun…enjoy!

          • Nano_Thermite_911

            So you have not seen the movie then, just the trailer. Most people don’t confuse the trailer for the actual movie. Most people would not also pretend to have examined the movie when they know in fact that they have not seen it. I have to give you the double fail on this one Vox.

            “Also…since the burden of proof rests on the people insisting that the improbable and unprovable is real, the troll is the whackjob who cites a collection of interviews backed by spooky music and pictures of the sky while a group of people of questionable credentials deliver emotionally charged quotes…and then insists that this has far more merit than the countless millions of people who design, build, maintain and operate military and civilian aircraft who inexplicably know nothing of this.”

            Excuse me again you may want to wait until you have actually seen the film before you pretend to critique what it does and does not present. Again just to clarify, the trailer is not the film. The film goes into much greater depth and is still only scratching the surface of what has been occurring. The patents are available in the research to support that this type of technology is in production and therefore in use.

            Speaking of Emotionally charged quotes “But don’t let that stop you… familiarity and experience are boooooring…its much more fun to sit in the dark and watch spooky videos and stare at the sky with dread and fear..”

            Pot calling the kettle black maybe? Why are you so reluctant to believe that the Government is capable of covering up massive black programs? Seems odd that you would haunt a disinfo site and feel the need to defend the status quo on this particular issue. And of course you never answer simple direct questions. Here I will restate them to see so that you can’t pretend they don’t exist either.

            Have you seen the film? No. You have not. Also I don’t know if your dad flying planes is relevant education for analysing soil samples, soil samples that show conclusively a massive spike in incidence of Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium in our water, soil, and hair when sampled. Of course had you actually seen the movie (which again you have not) you would know this.

            So please explain to me again why you feel the need to paint anyone who holds a scientifically educated and informed opinion of this incredibly irresponsible and toxic experiment as being “gullible, stupid, or crazy”?

            As for Ntolman, obviously you are not actually listening to what is being said either. Thank you for StormShadow for correcting these offenses of logic.

            For those who want to know for themselves please view this film and support the movement to stop this horrific program.

            http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm
            http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

            So please let me know what agency is responsible for the simultaneous dumping of the same toxic compounds in our soil, water, and air?

          • WhatWhacknuts

            What a SHAM!! Just like Human-caused Global Warming is a SHAM.

            IT’s GULLIBLE People like you that Allow the Crooked politicians to run all over us. If the Masses are stupid, they can get away with anything. My god! I knew people were dumb, but this takes the cake.

            Shame on you. Educate yourselves. Really. Seriously, this is why people like Obama got elected.

          • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

            I forgot to mention…even the disingenuous name “chemtrails” is unqualified doublespeak. Since the first jet engines operated there have been trails in the atmosphere…burn jet fuel at several hundred miles per hour several thousand feet above ground and see what happens depending on the atnospheric conditions of the day, Sometimes the dispersal is lightning quick…sometimes its not…but what it is natural considering the disruption caused by any operating jet engine.

            Not a very exciting truth though…yours would make a more exciting book…unfortunately it would still be fiction.

          • Nano_Thermite_911

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEFITGpXwZk
            Can you explain what causes the massive grids laid out in the sky here?

          • Wak

            IT’s the traffic layout. Some planes at altitude fly e/w some at another altitude fly n/s Very simple.
            Chemtrails are a SHAM. Just like Global Warming (human caused) is a SHAM

    • Maryif19

      You sound like such an ‘expert’ I was hoping perhaps you could explain the recent video footage of chemtrails being sprayed over mainland Mexico shot out the window of a commercial airliner at 40,000ft and yet the trails are visible out the window higher still with the plain being obviously far above the cloud line. Could you please also explain the growing body of video evidence of two plains flying at the same time at the same altitudes – one leaving a trail & the other not? Then could you please explain the video evidence of plains flying across leaving a trail, abruptly turning ‘off’ the trail, making a 180 degree turn & coming back, turning ‘on’ the trail again to lay another ‘line’ parallel to the first?
      & btw, there exist already many discovered & confirmed “cures” for cancer. In many cases they are the same cures for gullible, stupid & crazy :-)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BSSLYD2M7DGRVAZ4YJBAREXR4Q Jack

    Lay off the weed and maybe you won’t have the munchies for nachos.

  • stormshadow

    Maybe the people on the ground are fucking morons, they do seem to fit the profile. maybe the people who are denying it are liars, they also seem to fit the profile. I dont know who is right and who is wrong, but the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. i never came out on either side, i was simply pointing out the difference of opinion which your first two posts did not recognize. As to the ease of suing monsanto that you speak of. a little naive here i think. it is never quite so easy to sue a multi billion dollar corp. not impossible, but certainly not “no problem”.

  • Anonymous

    I’m sorry I was so angry earlier. The thing is the hypothesis put forth doesn’t make much sense to me. My problem is we have people who have no real understanding of science saying that it can’t be anything else other than aerosol spray.

    I like Monsanto is pretty evil as far as corporations go but I don’t even think they are evil enough to intentionally cause a problem so they can fix it.

  • ChemTrails For Lunch

    Have you seen the film? No. You have not. Also I don’t know if your dad flying planes is relevant education for analysing soil samples, soil samples that show conclusively a massive spike in incidence of Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium in our water, soil, and hair when sampled. Of course had you actually seen the movie (which again you have not) you would know this.

    So please explain to me again why you feel the need to paint anyone who holds a scientifically educated and informed opinion of this incredibly irresponsible and toxic experiment as being “gullible, stupid, or crazy”?

    As for Ntolman, obviously you are not actually listening to what is being said either. Thank you for StormShadow for correcting these offenses of logic.

    For those who want to know for themselves please view this film and support the movement to stop this horrific program.

    http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm
    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm

    Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future” aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying-part-ii.html

    So Vox does your Daddy know about this?

    Aluminum acts as a buffer that increases alkalinity and can decimate ecologies in large amounts. Mangels also pointed out that snow on Mt. Shasta was tested and sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) who found results that contained 61,100 ug/l or parts per billion of aluminum and 83 ug/l of barium. The normal amount of aluminum in the snow at Mt. Shasta is 0.5 ug/l. Drinking water allowable is 50ug/l. That means that the snow on Mt. Shasta has tested at 1200 times more poisonous than water standards allow for aluminum. Mangels said, “Mountain climbers that come from around the world are drinking the poisonous water from the snow on the mountain”. Mangels went on to say that government action is required at just 1000 ug/l of detected aluminum. Although he alerted several government agencies of these findings, no governmental action has been taken to date

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm

    Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future” aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying-part-ii.html

    So Vox does your Daddy know about this?

    Aluminum acts as a buffer that increases alkalinity and can decimate ecologies in large amounts. Mangels also pointed out that snow on Mt. Shasta was tested and sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) who found results that contained 61,100 ug/l or parts per billion of aluminum and 83 ug/l of barium. The normal amount of aluminum in the snow at Mt. Shasta is 0.5 ug/l. Drinking water allowable is 50ug/l. That means that the snow on Mt. Shasta has tested at 1200 times more poisonous than water standards allow for aluminum. Mangels said, “Mountain climbers that come from around the world are drinking the poisonous water from the snow on the mountain”. Mangels went on to say that government action is required at just 1000 ug/l of detected aluminum. Although he alerted several government agencies of these findings, no governmental action has been taken to date

    • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

      If you’re citingsomeone citing the KLSA study, they botched the meaning of the measurements ON FILM…anyone who can do the the math saw that the real meaning of the numbers had their measurement off by 10,000%…placing the actual level of barium present at far far below the EPA safety levels…

      BEFORE you e-mail me to flaunt the Nov. 9th “Chemtrails” report by Louisiana station KSLA (on Youtube here), please check out this analysis.

      At just over 50 seconds into the segment, Investigative Reporter Jeff Ferrell says

      “KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab. The results: A high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million, (ppm). That’s more than three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA.”
      The Problem? The actual video clearly shows 68.8 ug/L (stands for MICROGRAMS PER LITER), eg 68.8 ppb (STANDS FOR PARTS PER BILLION). A Liter of water is 1000 grams, or 1 kilogram. Just as 1+1=2, so does a millionth of a gram out of one thousand grams correspond to one part per Billion. And so does 68.8 millionths of a gram per liter correspond to 68.8 parts per BILLION.

      The reporter was not off by a factor of 1000, but only 100 instead, but only because he read the “68.8″ as “6.8″. So Ferrell only over-estimated the amount of barium in the test report by a factor of 100 (or, 10,000 PER CENT if you prefer percentages).

      From the EPA/CDC site:

      “The EPA has set a limit of 2.0 milligrams of barium per liter of drinking water (2.0 mg/L), which is the same as 2 ppm [parts per million].”
      The reporter got it wrong. The test result was not “three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA.” (i.e. 300%). It was actually less than 3.5%. It was around 30 times LESS THAN THE EPA’S TOXIC LIMIT.

      …of course, inside the chemtrail conspiracy circles, no one followed up on that initial error and they just continue to report it as factual…because Alex Jones doesn’t need any pesky facts getting in the way of a great scare.

      • Nano_Thermite_911

        You have latched onto one aspect that could have been an honest mistake on someone not associated with research in a direct way. But you still have not answered my very simple questions.

        What do you say about the toxicology reports that have been correlated to the spraying witnessed throughout the world but especially Mt. Shasta in Northern California??

        How do you explain the findings of Aluminum (A known neurotoxin) of up to 61,100 ppb in the snow in Mt. Shasta? Why does Monsanto conveniently patent Aluminum resistant seeds? This is the same Monsanto that has given BGH to an unsuspecting or protected public as well as purchasing XE formerly known as BlackWater.

        If the only claim you have is that a random news reporter misread a report and you ignore the other glaring evidence then you obviously don’t care to look into this matter with an open mind.

        Peace.

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    The Independent Thinker’s “CHEMTRAILS” Fact Sheet

    Have you noticed airplanes leaving white plumes in the sky? Often in grids, these trails widen and spread out, forming layers that look like clouds. Soon the sky is overcast. Here are 10 points to consider about this phenomenon.

    1. Current U.S. Senate bills are seeking to pass weather modification and weather experimentation policies to engineer and control our atmosphere.

    2. The jets tat spray aerosols in the sky have been seen all over the world. No governments or official agencies have been willing to discuss this activity.

    3. The content of the sprays includes fibers, metal particulates and biological elements (including fungi), many of which are microscopic. These micro-particles enter our bodies, eluding our immune systems and impairing our health. Some of the particles are artificially engineered and self-replicating.

    4. The metals in the sprays are ionized (electrically charged). The air we live in is now a plasma — able to conduct energy. It has been weaponized.

    5. The spraying has saturated our atmosphere with particulate matter that has whitened our once-blue sky. Visibility on the earth has been greatly reduced. A direct, data-based correlation exists between particulate levels in the air and our *MORTALITY (*emphasis mine)

    6. Dangerous levels of aluminum and barium have been found in soil and water samples nationwide. Both elements are highly toxic. Our rate of respiratory illness, allergies, Alzheimer’s and cancer has risen exponentially since the spraying was intensified in 1998.

    7. The spraying is a global covert operation. It is capable of engineering and controlling storms, planetary moisture and the earth’s electrical balance. It can manipulate radio frequencies and the electromagnetic spectrum for military and surveillance purposes. It can alter human awareness and behavior.

    8. The spraying typically creates cloud-like masses that spread to form a “sky-shield”. This sky shield is responsible for “global dimming”, now being presented as an antidote to global warming. According to NASA the world has already seen a 20% loss of sunlight.

    9. HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a military surveillance operation that generates electromagnetic frequencies. The combination of HAARP activity and the atmospheric spraying may be producing “climate change” a phenomenon blamed on nature’s response to “runaway global warming” Our environment is deliberately being altered.

    10. These programs are operating without our informed consent. Their agenda may be the total control of biology, ectology and the earth. To this end our “destructive” human ways (burning fossil fuels and overpopulation) may become the pretext to re-engineer nature as a means towards planetary “sustainability”

    Look up! Your wold is being artificially created.
    AboutTheSky.Com
    Carnicorn.Com
    NewYorkSkyWatch.Com
    BariumBlues.Com
    DontChemTrailMeBro.Com
    ISeeLines.Com

    …………………………………………………………………..
    And we all know Anthropogenic Global Warming is a Hoax! So why are they really toxifying our environments, our bodies, and our minds.

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    What say you VoxMagi?

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    The Independent Thinker’s “CHEMTRAILS” Fact Sheet

    Have you noticed airplanes leaving white plumes in the sky? Often in grids, these trails widen and spread out, forming layers that look like clouds. Soon the sky is overcast. Here are 10 points to consider about this phenomenon.

    1. Current U.S. Senate bills are seeking to pass weather modification and weather experimentation policies to engineer and control our atmosphere.

    2. The jets tat spray aerosols in the sky have been seen all over the world. No governments or official agencies have been willing to discuss this activity.

    3. The content of the sprays includes fibers, metal particulates and biological elements (including fungi), many of which are microscopic. These micro-particles enter our bodies, eluding our immune systems and impairing our health. Some of the particles are artificially engineered and self-replicating.

    4. The metals in the sprays are ionized (electrically charged). The air we live in is now a plasma — able to conduct energy. It has been weaponized.

    5. The spraying has saturated our atmosphere with particulate matter that has whitened our once-blue sky. Visibility on the earth has been greatly reduced. A direct, data-based correlation exists between particulate levels in the air and our *MORTALITY (*emphasis mine)

    6. Dangerous levels of aluminum and barium have been found in soil and water samples nationwide. Both elements are highly toxic. Our rate of respiratory illness, allergies, Alzheimer’s and cancer has risen exponentially since the spraying was intensified in 1998.

    7. The spraying is a global covert operation. It is capable of engineering and controlling storms, planetary moisture and the earth’s electrical balance. It can manipulate radio frequencies and the electromagnetic spectrum for military and surveillance purposes. It can alter human awareness and behavior.

    8. The spraying typically creates cloud-like masses that spread to form a “sky-shield”. This sky shield is responsible for “global dimming”, now being presented as an antidote to global warming. According to NASA the world has already seen a 20% loss of sunlight.

    9. HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a military surveillance operation that generates electromagnetic frequencies. The combination of HAARP activity and the atmospheric spraying may be producing “climate change” a phenomenon blamed on nature’s response to “runaway global warming” Our environment is deliberately being altered.

    10. These programs are operating without our informed consent. Their agenda may be the total control of biology, ectology and the earth. To this end our “destructive” human ways (burning fossil fuels and overpopulation) may become the pretext to re-engineer nature as a means towards planetary “sustainability”

    Look up! Your wold is being artificially created.
    AboutTheSky.Com
    Carnicorn.Com
    NewYorkSkyWatch.Com
    BariumBlues.Com
    DontChemTrailMeBro.Com
    ISeeLines.Com

    …………………………………………………………………..
    And we all know Anthropogenic Global Warming is a Hoax! So why are they really toxifying our environments, our bodies, and our minds.

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    What say you VoxMagi?

    • razzlebathbone

      Um… if the point of this evil plan is to mess with our bodies by making us breathe nasty chemicals, then why do they run these chemicals through jet engines at high altitude instead of just putting them in the water or the air conditioning systems in shopping malls and office buildings?

      • Nano_Thermite_911

        Well we know that food and water is being contaminated admittedly with any number of toxic compounds. Is it really that big of a stretch to imagine that our air supply would be susceptible.

        The real question is how do you explain the enhanced toxicity of our environment and the concomitant increase in associated illnesses? Not to mention the numerous video and photographic evidence displaying this phenomenon.

        Please look into this.

        Also if you want to reach a larger number of people then air is the way to go. I don’t visit shopping malls, but I do breathe oxygen.

    • Gavinrolph

      Hi there you seem very knowledgeable. I am fighting this war in London and I want to basically leaflet my community with the facts that you have listed above with tear off letters. what can u advise. I tihnk that this way at least you start to feel community support and empathy and common purpose rather than keeping it to internet/academic discussion. The joke is that this issue is very easily understood but the deniers are desperately making it out to be more complicated than it really is. If we reach enough intelligent people then the sheep will have to go along with what they know also.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    Ok…watched the movie…the evidence is extremely not compelling, beyond associating industrial waste (that IS a problem) with air traffic. Sketchy assumptions based on partial science aimed at proving a spurious point at best…and again, the counter evidence is OVERWHELMING…almost crushing by any standard, scientific or otherwise. Likewise, the people espousing this are very nearly so fanatic that fraudulent claims is almost par for the course.

    Frankly…I’d suggest some time hanging with pilots, engineers, wingnuts (aircraft repairmen) and manufacturing linemen. First hand experience will teach you that there is no magic hidden box with toxic waste that no one noticed until now. From the fuel to the engines to the exhaust…its only ‘spooky creepy and unexplained’…if you know nothing about it…which is how gullibility applies perfectly. In the absence of serious understanding and familiarity, any claim no matter how weird looks completely legitimate.

  • Anonymous

    Um… if the point of this evil plan is to mess with our bodies by making us breathe nasty chemicals, then why do they run these chemicals through jet engines at high altitude instead of just putting them in the water or the air conditioning systems in shopping malls and office buildings?

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    Well we know that food and water is being contaminated admittedly with any number of toxic compounds. Is it really that big of a stretch to imagine that our air supply would be susceptible.

    The real question is how do you explain the enhanced toxicity of our environment and the concomitant increase in associated illnesses? Not to mention the numerous video and photographic evidence displaying this phenomenon.

    Please look into this.

    Also if you want to reach a larger number of people then air is the way to go. I don’t visit shopping malls, but I do breathe oxygen.

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    ntolman, how is it that you feel adequately prepared to criticize a film you’ve not yet seen in it’s entirety?
    If you had actually seen the film or done any research ( I know it takes time and energy to learn new things) then you would realize the absurdity of your statement. The film is primarily compromised of showing SCIENTIFIC evidence supporting that this phenomenon is in fact happening. It raises questions that deserve answers.

    Why are so many people so unwilling to consider that Governments are capable of acts of malicious destruction to suit their nefarious ends. Isn’t that a large portion of what we call history??

    If you want to know about the SCIENTIFIC evidence please feel free to read the above post or visit realityzone.com or any of the other numerous web-sites documenting this phenomenon. You will find them chock full of SCIENTIFIC evidence.

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    Could you provide me with the link to the film you just watched.
    I’m curious where you found the movie in it’s entirety online.

    Also what do you say about the toxicology reports that have been correlated to the spraying witnessed throughout the world but especially Mt. Shasta in Northern California??

    Secondly can you provide links to any of the counter evidence you cite as being so self evident.

    Just because you allude to OVERWHELMING evidence doesn’t mean anything to me. Show some sources and scientific articles or you are obviously a troll.

    Peace.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    You invited me to watch…I watched…its directly above…push play and enjoy the failshow.

    Also…since the burden of proof rests on the people insisting that the improbable and unprovable is real, the troll is the whackjob who cites a collection of interviews backed by spooky music and pictures of the sky while a group of people of questionable credentials deliver emotionally charged quotes…and then insists that this has far more merit than the countless millions of people who design, build, maintain and operate military and civilian aircraft who inexplicably know nothing of this.

    Air Force brats who grow up next to a military air base, in the same town as an aviation school and a manufacturing plant (Duncan) can afford to doubt you as much as they please…because they have the experience and the familiarity that you don’t.

    But don’t let that stop you…familiarity and experience are booooring…its much more fun to sit in the dark and watch spooky videos and stare at the sky with dread and fear. Ignorance and snake oil are exciting and fun…enjoy!

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    I forgot to mention…even the disingenuous name “chemtrails” is unqualified doublespeak. Since the first jet engines operated there have been trails in the atmosphere…burn jet fuel at several hundred miles per hour several thousand feet above ground and see what happens depending on the atnospheric conditions of the day, Sometimes the dispersal is lightning quick…sometimes its not…but what it is natural considering the disruption caused by any operating jet engine.

    Not a very exciting truth though…yours would make a more exciting book…unfortunately it would still be fiction.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    If you’re citingsomeone citing the KLSA study, they botched the meaning of the measurements ON FILM…anyone who can do the the math saw that the real meaning of the numbers had their measurement off by 10,000%…placing the actual level of barium present at far far below the EPA safety levels…

    BEFORE you e-mail me to flaunt the Nov. 9th “Chemtrails” report by Louisiana station KSLA (on Youtube here), please check out this analysis.

    At just over 50 seconds into the segment, Investigative Reporter Jeff Ferrell says

    “KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab. The results: A high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million, (ppm). That’s more than three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA.”
    The Problem? The actual video clearly shows 68.8 ug/L (stands for MICROGRAMS PER LITER), eg 68.8 ppb (STANDS FOR PARTS PER BILLION). A Liter of water is 1000 grams, or 1 kilogram. Just as 1+1=2, so does a millionth of a gram out of one thousand grams correspond to one part per Billion. And so does 68.8 millionths of a gram per liter correspond to 68.8 parts per BILLION.

    The reporter was not off by a factor of 1000, but only 100 instead, but only because he read the “68.8″ as “6.8″. So Ferrell only over-estimated the amount of barium in the test report by a factor of 100 (or, 10,000 PER CENT if you prefer percentages).

    From the EPA/CDC site:

    “The EPA has set a limit of 2.0 milligrams of barium per liter of drinking water (2.0 mg/L), which is the same as 2 ppm [parts per million].”
    The reporter got it wrong. The test result was not “three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA.” (i.e. 300%). It was actually less than 3.5%. It was around 30 times LESS THAN THE EPA’S TOXIC LIMIT.

    …of course, inside the chemtrail conspiracy circles, no one followed up on that initial error and they just continue to report it as factual…because Alex Jones doesn’t need any pesky facts getting in the way of a great scare.

  • westworld

    People do not want to believe in malevolent actions by Governments because it destroys their construct of humanity and therefore their life. To raise these kinds questions is a terrifying prospect which is why they are are received with such passionate antagonism. We think that we are more evolved in the Western “First World” nations and think that we transcend the affections for greed and power. This, unfortunately, is not the case, we are just more sophisticated at covering up our true agenda. The bigger the affront to our sensibilities the more likely we are to disbelieve. That is why the outrage has been so timid on matters such as Oil Wars, Haliburton, GM foods, Global Warming, The Federal Reserve, US torture, etc.. People who think we are so different from other “less evolved” nations are sadly deluded. We are not much different in the way we treat each others than the corrupt African States. We just go about things differently. In a way they are more honest and open in their brutality. We are just better at public relations.

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    My sentiments exactly. Well said westworld!

  • Anonymous

    Some of the aerosols had an even stranger purpose than most would guess, to create radar obscuring clouds to disrupt attacks from space. So either a concern about future efforts to weaponise space by various countries or rather naive a defence against little green aliens.
    The little green alien angle is of course why the great secrecy rather than as a defence against human space launched missles or iron darts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment.

  • rtb61

    Some of the aerosols had an even stranger purpose than most would guess, to create radar obscuring clouds to disrupt attacks from space. So either a concern about future efforts to weaponise space by various countries or rather naive a defence against little green aliens.
    The little green alien angle is of course why the great secrecy rather than as a defence against human space launched missles or iron darts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment.

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    So you have not seen the movie then, just the trailer. Most people don’t confuse the trailer for the actual movie. Most people would not also pretend to have examined the movie when they know in fact that they have not seen it. I have to give you the double fail on this one Vox.

    “Also…since the burden of proof rests on the people insisting that the improbable and unprovable is real, the troll is the whackjob who cites a collection of interviews backed by spooky music and pictures of the sky while a group of people of questionable credentials deliver emotionally charged quotes…and then insists that this has far more merit than the countless millions of people who design, build, maintain and operate military and civilian aircraft who inexplicably know nothing of this.”

    Excuse me again you may want to wait until you have actually seen the film before you pretend to critique what it does and does not present. Again just to clarify, the trailer is not the film. The film goes into much greater depth and is still only scratching the surface of what has been occurring. The patents are available in the research to support that this type of technology is in production and therefore in use.

    Speaking of Emotionally charged quotes “But don’t let that stop you… familiarity and experience are boooooring…its much more fun to sit in the dark and watch spooky videos and stare at the sky with dread and fear..”

    Pot calling the kettle black maybe? Why are you so reluctant to believe that the Government is capable of covering up massive black programs? Seems odd that you would haunt a disinfo site and feel the need to defend the status quo on this particular issue. And of course you never answer simple direct questions. Here I will restate them to see so that you can’t pretend they don’t exist either.

    Have you seen the film? No. You have not. Also I don’t know if your dad flying planes is relevant education for analysing soil samples, soil samples that show conclusively a massive spike in incidence of Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium in our water, soil, and hair when sampled. Of course had you actually seen the movie (which again you have not) you would know this.

    So please explain to me again why you feel the need to paint anyone who holds a scientifically educated and informed opinion of this incredibly irresponsible and toxic experiment as being “gullible, stupid, or crazy”?

    As for Ntolman, obviously you are not actually listening to what is being said either. Thank you for StormShadow for correcting these offenses of logic.

    For those who want to know for themselves please view this film and support the movement to stop this horrific program.

    http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm
    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

    So please let me know what agency is responsible for the simultaneous dumping of the same toxic compounds in our soil, water, and air?

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEFITGpXwZk
    Can you explain what causes the massive grids laid out in the sky here?

  • Nano_Thermite_911

    You have latched onto one aspect that could have been an honest mistake on someone not associated with research in a direct way. But you still have not answered my very simple questions.

    What do you say about the toxicology reports that have been correlated to the spraying witnessed throughout the world but especially Mt. Shasta in Northern California??

    How do you explain the findings of Aluminum (A known neurotoxin) of up to 61,100 ppb in the snow in Mt. Shasta? Why does Monsanto conveniently patent Aluminum resistant seeds? This is the same Monsanto that has given BGH to an unsuspecting or protected public as well as purchasing XE formerly known as BlackWater.

    If the only claim you have is that a random news reporter misread a report and you ignore the other glaring evidence then you obviously don’t care to look into this matter with an open mind.

    Peace.

  • Andrew

    Good forum to fall into because I have seen this film. I am a friend of Micheal Murphy and I will defend his
    effort in this film. If one cannot look up into the sky and see what is happening. Then you do not know the first thing in science and that is observation. Next there is a Mountian of evidence this event is ongoing. The wild fire of video on You Tube took off around Dec. 2009. Just as there were a sudden group of talks about Geo-engineering in the Uk Science and Technology Committe and the US SCI &Tech Committe. The real unvailing of Geo-engineering happened right after the AAAS meeting. Do to the talks on geo-engineering the one
    symposium which is the most important was ” Can Geo-engineering save us from Global Warming”
    This is where David Keith talked about the how Alumina is the better choice of compounds to use over sulfates. For the first time it is now confirms the link to such patens as the Welsbach group
    of materials and many more. The puzzle is being uncovered without any media coverage. When was the last time you heard about this in your local or national media. Zero the powers to be do not what regulation.
    So you can try to Dis-info the facts by lies just like Dr. Alan Robok and ” I say bring it on”
    Watch the film and watch the end when Micheal confronts congress and watch them run like Rat’s.
    Listen to when he talks with Bart Gordon the chairman of the Science and Technology Committe.
    He syas that he “does’nt approve of on going programs” this was a slip on his part.
    You can go to my YouTube channel a watch David Keith talk about Alumina and other viedo from the AAAS
    meeting right in the street.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/jack42grafton?feature=mhum#p/u/3/iuZFkD56S-k
    Andrew
    Southern California Rep.
    Agriculture Defense Coalition
    California Skywatch
    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/?q=content/southern-california

  • Andrew

    Good forum to fall into because I have seen this film. I am a friend of Micheal Murphy and I will defend his
    effort in this film. If one cannot look up into the sky and see what is happening. Then you do not know the first thing in science and that is observation. Next there is a Mountian of evidence this event is ongoing. The wild fire of video on You Tube took off around Dec. 2009. Just as there were a sudden group of talks about Geo-engineering in the Uk Science and Technology Committe and the US SCI &Tech Committe. The real unvailing of Geo-engineering happened right after the AAAS meeting. Do to the talks on geo-engineering the one
    symposium which is the most important was ” Can Geo-engineering save us from Global Warming”
    This is where David Keith talked about the how Alumina is the better choice of compounds to use over sulfates. For the first time it is now confirms the link to such patens as the Welsbach group
    of materials and many more. The puzzle is being uncovered without any media coverage. When was the last time you heard about this in your local or national media. Zero the powers to be do not what regulation.
    So you can try to Dis-info the facts by lies just like Dr. Alan Robok and ” I say bring it on”
    Watch the film and watch the end when Micheal confronts congress and watch them run like Rat’s.
    Listen to when he talks with Bart Gordon the chairman of the Science and Technology Committe.
    He syas that he “does’nt approve of on going programs” this was a slip on his part.
    You can go to my YouTube channel a watch David Keith talk about Alumina and other viedo from the AAAS
    meeting right in the street.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/jack42grafton?feature=mhum#p/u/3/iuZFkD56S-k
    Andrew
    Southern California Rep.
    Agriculture Defense Coalition
    California Skywatch
    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/?q=content/southern-california

  • Andrew

    Good forum to fall into because I have seen this film. I am a friend of Micheal Murphy and I will defend his
    effort in this film. If one cannot look up into the sky and see what is happening. Then you do not know the first thing in science and that is observation. Next there is a Mountian of evidence this event is ongoing. The wild fire of video on You Tube took off around Dec. 2009. Just as there were a sudden group of talks about Geo-engineering in the Uk Science and Technology Committe and the US SCI &Tech Committe. The real unvailing of Geo-engineering happened right after the AAAS meeting. Do to the talks on geo-engineering the one
    symposium which is the most important was ” Can Geo-engineering save us from Global Warming”
    This is where David Keith talked about the how Alumina is the better choice of compounds to use over sulfates. For the first time it is now confirms the link to such patens as the Welsbach group
    of materials and many more. The puzzle is being uncovered without any media coverage. When was the last time you heard about this in your local or national media. Zero the powers to be do not what regulation.
    So you can try to Dis-info the facts by lies just like Dr. Alan Robok and ” I say bring it on”
    Watch the film and watch the end when Micheal confronts congress and watch them run like Rat’s.
    Listen to when he talks with Bart Gordon the chairman of the Science and Technology Committe.
    He syas that he “does’nt approve of on going programs” this was a slip on his part.
    You can go to my YouTube channel a watch David Keith talk about Alumina and other viedo from the AAAS
    meeting right in the street.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/jack42grafton?feature=mhum#p/u/3/iuZFkD56S-k
    Andrew
    Southern California Rep.
    Agriculture Defense Coalition
    California Skywatch
    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/?q=content/southern-california

  • itsreal44

    Alot of people are confused over this issue because they`ve got the chemtrail believers on one side and the naysayers on the other.Despite the sometimes exaggerated claims by the believers,i would still side with them over the naysayers because the claims of “water vapor”,”contrails” “increased jet traffic” contradict what we are seeing in our skies.I`ve been watching the skies for over 30 years and i`ve seen a big change that cannot be explained by increased jet traffic.I`m convinced that these “aerosol operations” are going on.And it appears that there could be many motives,including a desire to modify the atmosphere to support various military technologies,an attempt to make people ill as a biowarfare experiment,population reduction or to protect the interests of Big Pharma,an attempt to foul the food supply or render natural or organic agriculture useless.I think all of these are plausible.Then you have some people claiming that both sides are involved in a deception.I dont know.But i do know,from my own eyes,and my own analyses,that a big change has occured in our atmosphere.Our particulate levels are much higher,atmospheric conductivity appears to be higher(supporting the first motive i mentioned)high levels of metals(mentioned in patents)are turning up also.Our skies also appear different.Cloud forms are different,skies are “dirtier”,most days you dont see what i remember as clouds,you see “stringy” masses of cloud-like material,you see haze around the sun when viewed behind a stationary object,you see a glow in the west horizon after sundown,you see blue sky on bottom,pinkish white on top in the east horizon close to sundown.Even if you discount all the conspiracy theories,you have to see that our atmosphere is different.So,for whatever purpose,chemtrails have had a very real impact on our skies.

  • itsreal44

    Alot of people are confused over this issue because they`ve got the chemtrail believers on one side and the naysayers on the other.Despite the sometimes exaggerated claims by the believers,i would still side with them over the naysayers because the claims of “water vapor”,”contrails” “increased jet traffic” contradict what we are seeing in our skies.I`ve been watching the skies for over 30 years and i`ve seen a big change that cannot be explained by increased jet traffic.I`m convinced that these “aerosol operations” are going on.And it appears that there could be many motives,including a desire to modify the atmosphere to support various military technologies,an attempt to make people ill as a biowarfare experiment,population reduction or to protect the interests of Big Pharma,an attempt to foul the food supply or render natural or organic agriculture useless.I think all of these are plausible.Then you have some people claiming that both sides are involved in a deception.I dont know.But i do know,from my own eyes,and my own analyses,that a big change has occured in our atmosphere.Our particulate levels are much higher,atmospheric conductivity appears to be higher(supporting the first motive i mentioned)high levels of metals(mentioned in patents)are turning up also.Our skies also appear different.Cloud forms are different,skies are “dirtier”,most days you dont see what i remember as clouds,you see “stringy” masses of cloud-like material,you see haze around the sun when viewed behind a stationary object,you see a glow in the west horizon after sundown,you see blue sky on bottom,pinkish white on top in the east horizon close to sundown.Even if you discount all the conspiracy theories,you have to see that our atmosphere is different.So,for whatever purpose,chemtrails have had a very real impact on our skies.

  • http://jescie.net JESCIE
  • http://jescie.net JESCIE
  • WTF IS GOING ON

    I seen the movie and it scares the shit out of me! I have two kids and to think that this is something they will have to deal with in the future is an awful thought. In the movie at one of the geo science meetings on scientist state that they haven’t tested the efects of aluminum on the enviroment and it won’t effect us right now but we may be riding on the curtails of our grandkids. This coming from a guy that is probably not married with no kids and all he cares about is science and a fat paycheck from Monsanto no doubt. For someone to think our government would not do this to their citizens is very naive which in the past has admitted to giving syphilis to African Americans in the fifties just to see the full affect of the disease not to mention the unspeakable thing they did to Native Americans way back when. Companys like Monsanto and Conagra have huge influences on our government and can do pretty much anything they want to. Another good movie is Food Inc. It shows exactly how much power these companys do have. I feel there is not much I can do to stop any atrocities agains humanity but it only took 5% of our population to send the British back to the big island. Now im not saying saying to go join your local militia but we do need to stand up and make some noise so if it is not true someone can debunk it. I am surprised that the media hasn’t gave it any coverage not even Glenn Beck the king conspiracy. I come from a long line of farmers from Oklahoma and I know for a fact that the last four of five years my familys crops have been struggling and it hasn’t been from lack of rain. GOD HELP US!!

  • Maryif19

    You sound like such an ‘expert’ I was hoping perhaps you could explain the recent video footage of chemtrails being sprayed over mainland Mexico shot out the window of a commercial airliner at 40,000ft and yet the trails are visible out the window higher still with the plain being obviously far above the cloud line. Could you please also explain the growing body of video evidence of two plains flying at the same time at the same altitudes – one leaving a trail & the other not? Then could you please explain the video evidence of plains flying across leaving a trail, abruptly turning ‘off’ the trail, making a 180 degree turn & coming back, turning ‘on’ the trail again to lay another ‘line’ parallel to the first?
    & btw, there exist already many discovered & confirmed “cures” for cancer. In many cases they are the same cures for gullible, stupid & crazy :-)

  • Wak

    IT’s the traffic layout. Some planes at altitude fly e/w some at another altitude fly n/s Very simple.
    Chemtrails are a SHAM. Just like Global Warming (human caused) is a SHAM

  • WhatWhacknuts

    What a SHAM!! Just like Human-caused Global Warming is a SHAM.

    IT’s GULLIBLE People like you that Allow the Crooked politicians to run all over us. If the Masses are stupid, they can get away with anything. My god! I knew people were dumb, but this takes the cake.

    Shame on you. Educate yourselves. Really. Seriously, this is why people like Obama got elected.

  • Connecticut Skywatch

    Imagine how big the puzzle is, the What in The World Are They Spraying? documentary would need three parts at least! Now, if one is compelled enough to do the research, it would be prudent to start with The U.S House Committee on Science & Technology Hearing Charters on Geoengineering (The plan) then, the Hughes Aircraft Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,United States Patent 5003186, (the chemicals) then, GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L19703, doi:10.1029/2009GL039209 (the means) then, 2009,Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (the uses) I would warn people, not to dismiss it JUST because the government has not admitted it. The government was successful in keeping the Manhattan Project secret even though it employed over 130,000 people! These GOVERNMENT documents are CLEAR, the hearings CLEAR. the plans CLEAR, the purpose CLEAR when you consider the chemicals and the devastating consequences… but don’t take my Joe Shmoe opinion for it. TAKE THE DOCUMENTED SCIENTIFIC ONE!
    Ronnie, Connecticut Skywatch

  • Connecticut Skywatch

    Imagine how big the puzzle is, the What in The World Are They Spraying? documentary would need three parts at least! Now, if one is compelled enough to do the research, it would be prudent to start with The U.S House Committee on Science & Technology Hearing Charters on Geoengineering (The plan) then, the Hughes Aircraft Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,United States Patent 5003186, (the chemicals) then, GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L19703, doi:10.1029/2009GL039209 (the means) then, 2009,Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (the uses) I would warn people, not to dismiss it JUST because the government has not admitted it. The government was successful in keeping the Manhattan Project secret even though it employed over 130,000 people! These GOVERNMENT documents are CLEAR, the hearings CLEAR. the plans CLEAR, the purpose CLEAR when you consider the chemicals and the devastating consequences… but don’t take my Joe Shmoe opinion for it. TAKE THE DOCUMENTED SCIENTIFIC ONE!
    Ronnie, Connecticut Skywatch

  • Gavinrolph

    Hi there you seem very knowledgeable. I am fighting this war in London and I want to basically leaflet my community with the facts that you have listed above with tear off letters. what can u advise. I tihnk that this way at least you start to feel community support and empathy and common purpose rather than keeping it to internet/academic discussion. The joke is that this issue is very easily understood but the deniers are desperately making it out to be more complicated than it really is. If we reach enough intelligent people then the sheep will have to go along with what they know also.

  • http://koowie.com Koowie

    Nothing surprises me anymore…

  • http://koowie.com Koowie

    Nothing surprises me anymore…

  • Wakeupdvds.com

    If anyone would like a copy of Chemtrials-Aresol Crimes, the original chemtrial movie, please go to:

    http://wakeupdvds.com/Chemtrails-Conspiracy-Dvd-Aresol-CrimesToxic-Air–P2077729.aspx

  • Wakeupdvds.com

    If anyone would like a copy of Chemtrials-Aresol Crimes, the original chemtrial movie, please go to:

    http://wakeupdvds.com/Chemtrails-Conspiracy-Dvd-Aresol-CrimesToxic-Air–P2077729.aspx

21