9/11 Truthers Angry At Charlie Sheen For Not Spreading Their Crackpot Theories

Sheen 9/11This is exactly what’s wrong with “Truthers” of any kind … just because Charlie Sheen drank the kool aid once, does not mean he has to use every opportunity to expose these theories. Making him do what you think is the very definition of fascism. Via New York Magazine:

You just cannot make everyone happy! The 9/11 Truth Movement’s Mark Dice tells TMZ that Charlie Sheen — who has, in the past, publicly stated his support for the organization — is losing his conspiracy-theorist base because he’s not “asking hard questions about what happened on 9/11 and the resulting wars” at his live show. (Which is something he should be doing instead of “bragging about smoking crack and sleeping with hookers.”) Also, says Dice, the Q&A formatting needs tweaking.

61 Comments on "9/11 Truthers Angry At Charlie Sheen For Not Spreading Their Crackpot Theories"

  1. ArgosyJones | Apr 21, 2011 at 8:01 pm |

    Not to mention they really shouldn’t be begging crack smoking metally ill persons to tell america the “troof”. It kind of makes them look bad, if that’s possible.

  2. ArgosyJones | Apr 21, 2011 at 4:01 pm |

    Not to mention they really shouldn’t be begging crack smoking metally ill persons to tell america the “troof”. It kind of makes them look bad, if that’s possible.

    • Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 1:37 am |

      That’s okay, they still have Geraldo Riveria. And I heard Andy Dick is coming around, soon everyone will have to take them seriously.

  3. First of all telling somebody what to do is not the definition of fascism but is rather the definition of authoritarianism.

    Second of all as a christian theocratic attention seeker Mark Dice is a poor representative of the wider truth movement. Very few in the truth movement actually pay any attention to him and his self aggrandizing antics these days and many have recognized his probable status as a cointelpro like CIA asset.

    Last of all the biggest crackpot theory regarding 9/11 is that both conservation of momentum and Newton’s third law of motion (immutable LAWS of physics – not theories) were suspended long enough for buildings to enter free fall collapse without explosive demolition. A band of Saudi highjackers might be able to break the laws of man but not the laws of physics.

  4. Marklar_Prime | Apr 21, 2011 at 4:17 pm |

    First of all telling somebody what to do is not the definition of fascism but is rather the definition of authoritarianism.

    Second of all as a christian theocratic attention seeker Mark Dice is a poor representative of the wider truth movement. Very few in the truth movement actually pay any attention to him and his self aggrandizing antics these days and many have recognized his probable status as a cointelpro like CIA asset.

    Last of all the biggest crackpot theory regarding 9/11 is that both conservation of momentum and Newton’s third law of motion (immutable LAWS of physics – not theories) were suspended long enough for buildings to enter free fall collapse without explosive demolition. A band of Saudi highjackers might be able to break the laws of man but not the laws of physics.

    • Tuna Ghost | Apr 23, 2011 at 4:56 am |

      The towers didn’t fall at freefall speed. This idea has been debunked several times in very easy to understand terms.

      • Right, the Twin Towers fell at the rate of destruction(top down using explosives). Building 7 fell at free-fall speed, and that confirms explosive demolition.

  5. Crackpot Theories?
    you guys helped release ‘loose change: final cut’
    disinfo, are you fucking retarded!
    show some support for the truth.
    fucking posers.

  6. Crackpot Theories?
    you guys helped release ‘loose change: final cut’
    disinfo, are you fucking retarded!
    show some support for the truth.
    fucking posers.

    • I agree, besides how the buildings fell there are more unanswered questions and more due diligence on destroying evidence than should’ve been allowed.

  7. I agree, besides how the buildings fell there are more unanswered questions and more due diligence on destroying evidence than should’ve been allowed.

  8. RedHerring | Apr 21, 2011 at 9:34 pm |

    I feel sorry for the people who believe this stuff. If you can understand this website (yes a government source, oh no!):

    http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

    … you will be realize there are other things in the world to be worried about rather than the 911 Truth red herring. Yes folks, it’s a distraction …

    A lot of people can’t understand this stuff so rather than try to, they want to place blame somewhere other than be willing to accept the basic fact the world is not a nice place. Bad things happen to good people. Life is unfair.

    Why not spend time on what you can change?

  9. I feel sorry for the people who believe this stuff. If you can understand this website (yes a government source, oh no!):

    http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

    … you will be realize there are other things in the world to be worried about rather than the 911 Truth red herring. Yes folks, it’s a distraction …

    A lot of people can’t understand this stuff so rather than try to, they want to place blame somewhere other than be willing to accept the basic fact the world is not a nice place. Bad things happen to good people. Life is unfair.

    Why not spend time on what you can change?

    • psychegram | Apr 23, 2011 at 10:23 am |

      Cass Sunstein;’s sock puppets strike again!

      • Cass Sunstein, eh? Been watching just a little too much Glenn Beck I suppose. Thanks for proving the point of the article, that if you disagree with Truthers you’re supposedly a “sock puppet” … Keep the groupthink coming Truthers.

  10. You people are sold out fools! EVEN 6 OF THE 10 9/11 COMMISSIONERS THEMSELVES have said they were lied to and that the people deserve a new, truly independent investigation! OFCOURSE you’re not going to hear this on/in mainstream media…and I’m really shocked this website stooped to the establishment level of propagandizing for the New World Order, hiding the truth about 9/11! What a shame! This is the epitome of why the people are in the mess they are today, politically, financially, etc! Disinformation spreading disinformation, on multiple levels in this article! I thought I could trust this website…Sad! Fake a$$ phony truther site!

  11. You people are sold out fools! EVEN 6 OF THE 10 9/11 COMMISSIONERS THEMSELVES have said they were lied to and that the people deserve a new, truly independent investigation! OFCOURSE you’re not going to hear this on/in mainstream media…and I’m really shocked this website stooped to the establishment level of propagandizing for the New World Order, hiding the truth about 9/11! What a shame! This is the epitome of why the people are in the mess they are today, politically, financially, etc! Disinformation spreading disinformation, on multiple levels in this article! I thought I could trust this website…Sad! Fake a$$ phony truther site!

    • ThinkDifferent | Apr 21, 2011 at 6:55 pm |

      Thanks for proving the point of the article. Would you like to try to explain how having a different point of view from the one you have is a bad thing?

    • ArgosyJones | Apr 21, 2011 at 9:26 pm |

      Celebs 4 truth. What a pathetic example of appeal to authority. Why would celebrities know anything about 9/11 or who killed kennedy? Get a life.

    • Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 3:48 pm |

      Lemme guess, you’re mad ’cause the Jews run everything, aren’t you

  12. ThinkDifferent | Apr 21, 2011 at 10:55 pm |

    Thanks for proving the point of the article. Would you like to try to explain how having a different point of view from the one you have is a bad thing?

  13. ArgosyJones | Apr 22, 2011 at 1:26 am |

    Celebs 4 truth. What a pathetic example of appeal to authority. Why would celebrities know anything about 9/11 or who killed kennedy? Get a life.

  14. ArgosyJones | Apr 22, 2011 at 1:26 am |

    Celebs 4 truth. What a pathetic example of appeal to authority. Why would celebrities know anything about 9/11 or who killed kennedy? Get a life.

  15. The term “Crackpot theory,” does not place the actual evidence on the table.
    1. The buildings fell at nearly free fall speed.
    2. Building 7 was demolished.
    3. The slide released by the gov’t of the pentagon shows NO PLANE
    4. Steel does not MELT from a collision with a plane.
    5. Thermite was found in the rubble.
    There is much more to this story in terms of evidence that does not add up to the official version of events.
    What about the 9/11 Commission?
    I am not angry at Charlie. I just want someone to acknowledge the real evidence that exists about this, and to acknowledge the roll of our country in the modern world for what it is: Corporatist Fascism.

    Just because empirical pieces of evidence cannot prove every conspiracy theory does not mean that the official version of events is not total bullshit.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

  16. The term “Crackpot theory,” does not place the actual evidence on the table.
    1. The buildings fell at nearly free fall speed.
    2. Building 7 was demolished.
    3. The slide released by the gov’t of the pentagon shows NO PLANE
    4. Steel does not MELT from a collision with a plane.
    5. Thermite was found in the rubble.
    There is much more to this story in terms of evidence that does not add up to the official version of events.
    What about the 9/11 Commission?
    I am not angry at Charlie. I just want someone to acknowledge the real evidence that exists about this, and to acknowledge the roll of our country in the modern world for what it is: Corporatist Fascism.

    Just because empirical pieces of evidence cannot prove every conspiracy theory does not mean that the official version of events is not total bullshit.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

    • Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 1:36 am |

      1. No, they didn’t. They appear to on video because dust and debris is showering down at high speed, which is obscuring the rest of the structure falling at the expected rate. This kind of mistake is what comes from getting your “evidence” from videos on YouTube.

      2. Yes. By debris and fire, as is detailed extensively in physics journals and structure magazines. Also as is supported by a lot of eyewitness testimony of rescue workers who were there.

      3. This is the stupidest of all claims by the truthers. Because a fast moving blur on a video doesn’t appear to you to be a plane, it obviously isn’t a plane, and never mind the physical evidence or the eyewitness testimony that says a giant god-damned plane smashed into the building. And never mind that if the Truther claim was true, there would be a plane and a couple hundred people simply vanishing off the face of the earth.

      4. Good thing the claims of molten steel are bunk!

      5. It wasn’t. The article truthers like to bring out to “prove” that is was a.) didn’t say thermite was in the rubble, only that rust and small iron particles which possibly could have come from a theoretical thermite compound was found, and b.) was completely discredited by the same journal in which it was published (published without the editor’s permission, who quickly resigned in embarrassment that such an article was published under her watch).

      So…yeah.

      • Do you think there is a chance the “conspiracy theory” may be true, and that the buildings may have been taken down in a “controlled demolition?” If so, what are the chances?

        • Tuna Ghost | Apr 23, 2011 at 5:12 pm |

          The chances of a controlled demolition bringing down buildings on 9/11 are next to zero. It would require far too many people and technology that doesn’t exist. A far more likely scenario is that someone knew there was an attack planned and did nothing to stop it in order to benefit from the resulting panic. Think about it: there’s no shortage of people who want to fly planes into buildings. Why not let them, and reap the benefits? There’s no paper trail, no physical evidence of any kind to link back to you. Its what any person with a brain would do. You get all the benefits with none of the risk.

    • Woodshedding | Apr 22, 2011 at 6:05 pm |

      BTW, Tuna Ghost, Red Herring, et al are most likely paid shills, since they can speak in full sentences. Anyone with more than half a brain knows the official 9/11 story is AT LEAST questionable.

      • Thanks for putting words in my mouth and proving the point of the article. I’m not saying I don’t have questions, all I am saying I agree that 9/11 Truthers are asking some really bad questions, especially Mark Dice. This is a guy who also think the Statue of Liberty is the work of satanists.

        And I’m dying to know this, exactly who would be paying me?

        • And another thing, if one sympathizes with your beliefs, then they can’t speak in full sentences? So are you saying 9/11 Truths have a poor grasp of the English language? Don’t sell yourself short, man.

  17. Be Joi 11 | Apr 22, 2011 at 5:01 am |

    Crackpot theories? I suppose that you, Vulcan, have got 9/11 all figured out? Please, why don’t you enlighten the rest of the globe?

  18. Be Joi 11 | Apr 22, 2011 at 1:01 am |

    Crackpot theories? I suppose that you, Vulcan, have got 9/11 all figured out? Please, why don’t you enlighten the rest of the globe?

  19. Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 5:36 am |

    1. No, they didn’t. They appear to on video because dust and debris is showering down at high speed, which is obscuring the rest of the structure falling at the expected rate. This kind of mistake is what comes from getting your “evidence” from videos on YouTube.

    2. Yes. By debris and fire, as is detailed extensively in physics journals and structure magazines. Also as is supported by a lot of eyewitness testimony of rescue workers who were there.

    3. This is the stupidest of all claims by the truthers. Because a fast moving blur on a video doesn’t appear to you to be a plane, it obviously isn’t a plane, and never mind the physical evidence or the eyewitness testimony that says a giant god-damned plane smashed into the building. And never mind that if the Truther claim was true, there would be a plane and a couple hundred people simply vanishing off the face of the earth.

    4. Good thing the claims of molten steel are bunk!

    5. It wasn’t. The article truthers like to bring out to “prove” that is was a.) didn’t say thermite was in the rubble, only that rust and small iron particles which possibly could have come from a theoretical thermite compound was found, and b.) was completely discredited by the same journal in which it was published (published without the editor’s permission, who quickly resigned in embarrassment that such an article was published under her watch).

    So…yeah.

  20. Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 5:37 am |

    That’s okay, they still have Geraldo Riveria. And I heard Andy Dick is coming around, soon everyone will have to take them seriously.

  21. Anonymous | Apr 22, 2011 at 10:30 am |

    On the one hand I approve of Disinfo being a platform for opposing views. I don’t necessarily have to agree with every article. What I approve less of, however, is an article like this one merely being an excuse to spout hyperbole rhetoric, to the point of childish name calling against those sceptic of the status quo.

  22. Tchoutoye | Apr 22, 2011 at 6:30 am |

    On the one hand I approve of Disinfo being a platform for opposing views. I don’t necessarily have to agree with every article. What I approve less of, however, is an article like this one merely being an excuse to spout hyperbole rhetoric, to the point of childish name calling against those sceptic of the status quo. At least put some effort into feigning that your article provides a minimum of insight.

  23. Drinky McGee | Apr 22, 2011 at 12:39 pm |

    Hey, Mr. Dice, don’t slam Charilie for smoking crack. He never would have believed your horseshit otherwise.

  24. Drinky McGee | Apr 22, 2011 at 8:39 am |

    Hey, Mr. Dice, don’t slam Charilie for smoking crack. He never would have believed your horseshit otherwise.

  25. Tuna Ghost | Apr 22, 2011 at 7:48 pm |

    Lemme guess, you’re mad ’cause the Jews run everything, aren’t you

  26. Anonymous | Apr 22, 2011 at 7:53 pm |

    I don’t understand the term “conspiracy-theorist base.” Does that refer to people who believe the completely untenable theory that several Arabs, most of whom are still alive, flew some jets into the twin towers?

  27. Woodshedding | Apr 22, 2011 at 3:53 pm |

    I don’t understand the term “conspiracy-theorist base.” Does that refer to people who believe the completely untenable theory that several Arabs, most of whom are still alive, flew some jets into the twin towers?

  28. Anonymous | Apr 22, 2011 at 10:05 pm |

    BTW, Tuna Ghost, Red Herring, et al are most likely paid shills, since they can speak in full sentences. Anyone with more than half a brain knows the official 9/11 story is AT LEAST questionable.

  29. RedHerring | Apr 22, 2011 at 10:14 pm |

    Thanks for putting words in my mouth and proving the point of the article. I’m not saying I don’t have questions, all I am saying I agree that 9/11 Truthers are asking some really bad questions, especially Mark Dice. This is a guy who also think the Statue of Liberty is the work of satanists.

    And I’m dying to know this, exactly who would be paying me?

  30. RedHerring | Apr 22, 2011 at 10:20 pm |

    And another thing, if one sympathizes with your beliefs, then they can’t speak in full sentences? So are you saying 9/11 Truths have a poor grasp of the English language? Don’t sell yourself short, man.

  31. sorry charlie | Apr 22, 2011 at 11:30 pm |

    For once Charlie Sheen did the right thing. He’s not a credible spokesperson for what happened on 9/11. We have engineers and scientist speaking out on this issue. Leave it to the people who have the knowledge and credibility to do the work and make the points clear to the rest of us. Many of them are calling for a real investigation, and dismiss the white wash we’ve been handed.

  32. sorry charlie | Apr 22, 2011 at 7:30 pm |

    For once Charlie Sheen did the right thing. He’s not a credible spokesperson for what happened on 9/11. We have engineers and scientist speaking out on this issue. Leave it to the people who have the knowledge and credibility to do the work and make the points clear to the rest of us. Many of them are calling for a real investigation, and dismiss the white wash we’ve been handed.

  33. Hundreds of credible respected professionals from several relevant fields have come forward & put their reputations on the line.

    It deserves a serious look at & shouldn’t all be generalized as all crackpot.

  34. Hundreds of credible respected professionals from several relevant fields have come forward & put their reputations on the line.

    It deserves a serious look at & shouldn’t all be generalized as all crackpot.

  35. Do you think there is a chance the “conspiracy theory” may be true, and that the buildings may have been taken down in a “controlled demolition?” If so, what are the chances?

  36. Tuna Ghost | Apr 23, 2011 at 8:56 am |

    The towers didn’t fall at freefall speed. This idea has been debunked several times in very easy to understand terms.

  37. Right, the Twin Towers fell at the rate of destruction(top down using explosives). Building 7 fell at free-fall speed, and that confirms explosive demolition.

  38. psychegram | Apr 23, 2011 at 2:23 pm |

    Cass Sunstein;’s sock puppets strike again!

  39. RedHerring | Apr 23, 2011 at 2:42 pm |

    Cass Sunstein, eh? Been watching just a little too much Glenn Beck I suppose. Thanks for proving the point of the article, that if you disagree with Truthers you’re supposedly a “sock puppet” … Keep the groupthink coming Truthers.

  40. Tuna Ghost | Apr 23, 2011 at 9:08 pm |

    Both of those statements have been proven false on numerous occasions. Would you like links to the information resources that will set you straight? Ask and you shall receive. It’s the easiest thing in the world. It would be my pleasure.

  41. Tuna Ghost | Apr 23, 2011 at 9:12 pm |

    The chances of a controlled demolition bringing down buildings on 9/11 are next to zero. It would require far too many people and technology that doesn’t exist. A far more likely scenario is that someone knew there was an attack planned and did nothing to stop it in order to benefit from the resulting panic. Think about it: there’s no shortage of people who want to fly planes into buildings. Why not let them, and reap the benefits? There’s no paper trail, no physical evidence of any kind to link back to you. Its what any person with a brain would do. You get all the benefits with none of the risk.

  42. Anonymous | Apr 25, 2011 at 3:58 am |

    He could do a LOT of good going against the 9/11 conspiracy and the “Ethnic group” behind it and the MEDIA…

    Get people to break the monopoly of lies. Even if 9/11 was POd Arabs and every “Coincidence” the govt claims (rrrright) is true, I’d like media empires to COMPETE not cooperate.

  43. greengestalt | Apr 24, 2011 at 11:58 pm |

    He could do a LOT of good going against the 9/11 conspiracy and the “Ethnic group” behind it and the MEDIA…

    Get people to break the monopoly of lies. Even if 9/11 was POd Arabs and every “Coincidence” the govt claims (rrrright) is true, I’d like media empires to COMPETE not cooperate.

Comments are closed.