Is Tony Kushner The New Helen Thomas?

Playwright Tony Kushner. Photos: Timothy Herrigan/Courtney Hamilton (CC)

Playwright Tony Kushner. Photos: Timothy Herrigan/Courtney Hamilton (CC)

Jewish Playwright has honorary degree restored by City University of New York after it had been stripped because he was labeled too critical of Israel.

First, it was Helen Thomas.

After the veteran White House correspondent spoke inelegantly once about her feelings about Israel—and apologized, but to no effect—she was blackballed at the instigation of strident Israeli supporters and her career achievement-standing journalism awards were stripped. She became persona non-grate with many media outlets joining in the denunciations of a colleague they honored for decades.

Many at the time suspected the wrath was especially severe because she is an Arab-American. Right-wing provocateur Ann Coulter even asked if “that Arab” should be allowed near the President.

Now a new flap driven by some of the same issues involves a Jewish Pulitzer Prize winning playwright and a leading academic institution in New York.

His name, Tony Kushner, best known for the brilliant Angels in America plays that bravely took on AIDS and the hypocrisy, if not criminality, of a the prominent Jewish lawyer Roy Cohen who was an aide to the late fanatically anti-communist symbol, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

Now McCarthy’s name has been introduced into a debate following a decision by a City University of New York to strip Kushner of an honorary degree after one conservative pro-Israel trustee took umbrage at his criticisms of the Israeli government and convinced his colleagues to take action.

Supporters of Israel have been primed by their lobby and the Israeli government to confront and all attempts to “ deligitimate” Israel and even criticize its government.

Kushner became the symbol of those closet anti-Semites or self-hating Jews bashing Israel, so a group of trustees turned him into an Israel hater. He became a new Helen Thomas even though he is Jewish.

But in New York, unlike Washington which seems ruled by a conservative media elite that is frequently intimidated, if not directed by the Israel Lobby, there was a cultural push back against what was seen as an act of intolerance that violated freedom of thought.

Soon the New York Times was making it a big story with strong statements against the efforts of conservative Republican trustee Jeffrey S. 
Wiesenfeld, to blackball plans to honor Kushner by
 John Jay College, one of the system’s schools. Wiesenfeld did not win much sympathy when he was quoted as questioning whether Palestinians were human.

Blogger MJ Rosenberg offered insight into Wissenfeld’s didactic views:

“Here is his Wiesenfeld’s rationale for his actions, which he offered in a telephone call with the Atlantic’s Jeff Goldberg:

“My mother would call Tony Kushner a kapo,” he said in a telephone conversation earlier this morning. “Kapos” were Jews who worked for the Germans in concentration camps.

Pretty amazing likening criticizing Israel to working with the Nazis to kill Jews. But Wisenfeld, has some strong views.”  He was also aligned with Pam Geller, the Muslim hater who led the fight against the so-called Ground Zero mosque. He was an active supporter of AIPAC, the Israel lobby.

His diatribe was seen as too severe and inflammatory by many civic leaders. Prominent supporters of Israel were soon supporting Kushner, including former Mayor Ed Koch, newspaper Publisher Mort Zuckerman and a who’s who of cultural figures.

Enter the top officials at the City University who agreed to review the decision and vowed to reverse it. On May 9th, they did so, voting unanimously to restore the award.”

The Guardian reported:

“The chancellor, Matthew Goldstein, addressing the board on Monday night, said he had supported the original recommendation of the award and praised Kushner’s ‘extraordinary body of work’. He urged the board to overturn last week’s decision and to support the award.”

Some members of the board spoke, all of them voicing support for Kushner. One of them described the row as a “blemish” on the university’s reputation as an upholder of freedom of expression.

Tony Kushner had told the Times,

“I have been honored many times by prominent Jewish organizations, proudly identified as a Jew and maintained a passionate support for the continuous existence of the State of Israel,” he said in an interview on Thursday. “An apology should come from the Board of Trustees for not following the dictates of simple fairness and decency when this happened, and allowing someone who deserved better treatment to be treated shabbily.”

Since the CUNY board’s action, he has received an outpouring of support from peace groups, friends, and intellectual and artistic groups. “It’s completely overwhelming,” he said.

The City University’s leaders rushed to restore its honor and on Monday Night, May 9th, reversed the Trustee’s decision, reinstating Kushner’s award.

Here’s how the Times put it:

“Having embarrassed themselves more than was absolutely necessary in the eyes of many New Yorkers, trustees of the City University of New York are … to undo the damage.”

In an earlier statement, Kushner, who has edited a collection of essays critical of Israel said:

“It’s been my experience that truth eventually triumphs over SoundBits spin and defamation, and that reason, honest inquiry, and courage, which are more appealing and more persuasive than demagoguery, will carry the day.”

His story went from the Jewish press to the pages of the New York Times, and quickly became an international free speech issue.

But even if his status is rehabilitated, The Times asks, “Will a reversal end the affair? Not necessarily. Closing a self-inflicted wound can be tough.”

The problem, of course, is that Kushner’s status earned him reconsideration; other less well-known personages critical of Israel, including academic and political analysts, are often targeted in ways that generate less attention and debate. Many conclude it’s just not worth it to speak up about Israeli policy less they became targeted and smeared, and even lose their jobs.

Meanwhile, Helen Thomas continues to live defensively as an exile in the straitlaced Washington Media world in which she was once a luminary.  A group of journalists are now lobbying The Society of Professional Journalists to reinstate her status but, at age 90, she has no major newspapers or high-profile politically-acceptable people behind her.

Perhaps Tony Kushner could do a play about how Thomas has suffered the slings and arrows of unfair slurs and demonization.

Filmmaker and News Dissector Danny Schechter edits Mediachannel.org.
For more on his film Plunder: The Crime of Our Time and companion book The Crime Of Our Time: Why Wall Street Is Not Too Big To Jail, visit plunderthecrimeofourtime.com.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Hadrian999

    The various Israel and Jewish lobby groups have way too much power in this country. All a public person has to do to be totally ruined in this country is to publicly disagree with Israel or any Jewish group. the USS Liberty is proof positive of the power Israel wields over our government, most people have never heard of this, can you name any other country that can attack an unarmed navel vessel in international waters, kill dozens of servicemen and suffer no consequences.

  • Hadrian999

    The various Israel and Jewish lobby groups have way too much power in this country. All a public person has to do to be totally ruined in this country is to publicly disagree with Israel or any Jewish group. the USS Liberty is proof positive of the power Israel wields over our government, most people have never heard of this, can you name any other country that can attack an unarmed navel vessel in international waters, kill dozens of servicemen and suffer no consequences.

  • SF2K01

    There’s a big difference between criticizing any country/government and the blatant anti-semitism of Helen Thomas. Any normal person could notice she clearly told the Jews to get the hell out. Not the Israelis, and not even a call for peace. Somehow, calling for the extermination and/or forced relocation of the Jews is acceptable as long as it’s in the context of Israel. It’s very notable that the comment below refers to how the Jews have too much power in this country (regardless of what the subject matter is). All these claims have been said before, none of it is new, merely the ability to focus the accusations on a country of Jews instead of the Jews as a religion or ethnicity.

    • http://www.ContraControl.com/ Zenc

      Wow, it’s almost as though the above response is some sort of automated computer script that went a bit buggy.

      The thought that there may be groups, or individuals which regularly defend groups, who have automated scripts to do the work for them is somewhat disturbing.

      • SF2K01

        Or just a bug in disinfo, now fixed (as I definitely didn’t type it that way). Some people just see conspiracies everywhere, hence why some people blame the Jews for all the problems of the world.

        • Hadrian999

           holding the Israeli government accountable for it’s actions is not equal to blaming the jews for all the problems of the world

          • SF2K01

            It’s one thing to be critical of Israel, as we should be critical of any government, but utilizing anti-semitic claims while rebranding them as anti-Israel is unacceptable, and made much more obvious when you interchange Jew and Israel freely. “The Jewish lobby has too much power in this country,” as you said, is an anti-semitic claim that many websites use when talking about their disagreements with the Israeli government.

  • Anonymous

    There’s a big difference between criticizing any country/government and the blatant anti-semitism of Helen Thomas. Any normal person could notice she clearly told the Jews to get the hell out. Not the Israelis, and not even a call for peace. Somehow, calling for the extermination and/or forced relocation of the Jews is acceptable as long as it’s in the context of Israel. It’s very notable that the comment below refers to how the Jews have too much power in this country (regardless of what the subject matter is). All these claims have been said before, none of it is new, merely the ability to focus the accusations on a country of Jews instead of the Jews as a religion or ethnicity.It’s very notable that the comment below refers to how the Jews have too much power in this country (regardless of what the subject matter is). All these claims have been said before, none of it is new, merely the ability to focus the accusations on a country of Jews instead of the Jews as a religion or ethnicity.

  • http://www.ContraControl.com/ Zenc

    Wow, it’s almost as though the above response is some sort of automated computer script that went a bit buggy.

    The thought that there may be groups, or individuals which regularly defend groups, who have automated scripts to do the work for them is somewhat disturbing.

  • Anonymous

    Or just a bug in disinfo, now fixed (as I definitely didn’t type it that way). Some people just see conspiracies everywhere, hence why some people blame the Jews for all the problems of the world.

  • Hadrian999

     holding the Israeli government accountable for it’s actions is not equal to blaming the jews for all the problems of the world

  • Anonymous

    That’s my point. It’s one thing to be critical of Israel, as we should be critical of any government, but utilizing anti-semitic claims while rebranding while as anti-zionism is unacceptable, and made much more obvious when you interchange Jew and Israel. “The Jewish lobby has too much power in this country,” as you said, is an anti-semitic claim.

  • Anonymous

    That’s my point. It’s one thing to be critical of Israel, as we should be critical of any government, but utilizing anti-semitic claims while rebranding while as anti-zionism is unacceptable, and made much more obvious when you interchange Jew and Israel. “The Jewish lobby has too much power in this country,” as you said, is an anti-semitic claim.