Through the Eye of a Needle …

DopeVia Dystopia Diaries:

Some unexpected good news here:  A Wisconsin judge has ruled that the passage of Governor Scott Walker’s aggressive union-busting bill’s, engineered late in the night without the statutorially required 24 hours notice or the quorum necessary for a budget bill, is a violation of the state’s open meetings law.  An injunction is now in place to prevent the bill’s enforcement.

You may recall the raucuous buildup to the April 5th Wisconsin Supreme Court election which was widely seen as a referendum on that un-precedented (and now apparently un-lawful) powergrab, an Orwellian abuse of rhetoric and procedure whose only certain purpose was to destroy any group to politcally organize outside the orbit of his Koch brothers patrons.  David Prosser, the Republican incumbent was and still is regarded as strongly in favour of Walker’s dubious scheme, whereas his opponent, Madison-based JoAnne Kloppenberg ran on the ticket of the Democratic party who not unnaturally opposed it.

But if the buildup was a barn-burner, the prolonged aftermath was distinctly anti-climactic.  The 11th hour defection of one of Prosser’s campaign managers seemed to deal a heavy blow to the Republican’s judicial credibility.  Lazy or naive[1] commentators would have expected the hoary old chestnut about Wisconsin being the clean-government state, a la it’s Robert La Follette heritage, to come into play here and cast Prosser’s chances in doubt.

However, as so often happens, The Lord delivered a miracle unto his Chosen People.  One day after poll close, when current stats showed the candidates within .00001% of each other, a prodigy appeared unto Wisconsin:  an additional 14,000 votes which “mistakenly” did not appear in those original tallies, which eventually translated into a decisive 7,000+ vote “victory” for Prosser.

In a hurry for your slurry?  Check out the rest-slop on the bypass to perdition: this article continued at the Dystopia Diaries

, , , , , , ,

  • Brentskinner5

    Yes, of course, because groups of people who earn their living off my tax money should be shielded against my justified need to lower their pay. Furthermore, my justified need to lower their pay — or even just my desire to lower their pay — is inherently incorrect. They hold more right to my money than do I. You guys are tools.

  • Brentskinner5

    Yes, of course, because groups of people who earn their living off my tax money should be shielded against my justified need to lower their pay. Furthermore, my justified need to lower their pay — or even just my desire to lower their pay — is inherently incorrect. They hold more right to my money than do I. You guys are tools.

    • Jin The Ninja

       go troll faux news.

    • Jin The Ninja

       go troll faux news.

  • http://profiles.google.com/saintzedofourlostyouth R Z

     go troll faux news.

21
More in Civil Liberties, David Prosser, Elections, JoAnne Kloppenburg, Labor Unions, Politics, Scott Walker
Rachel Maddow on The Problem With Pakistan in 30 Seconds (Video)

Close