How Accurate Were the Nevada Republican Caucus Results?

NevadaMark Wachtler writes in the Examiner:

For the second time in just five primary states, the Republican Party, with the assistance of the national corporate news media, is raising questions about the legitimacy of this season’s primary election system. First, the Iowa Republican Party and the entire American media knowingly reported the wrong Iowa Caucus results with the wrong person being declared the winner. Last night, it appears the same thing may be happening in Nevada. And again like Iowa, critics are accusing the GOP of suspicious activity.

Perhaps it’s indicative that the beneficiary of these recurring vote counting “mistakes” always seems to be former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. He’s just happens to be the same man that both the Republican Party establishment and the four corporations that own all of America’s news media outlets are actively supporting.

Read more in the Examiner and more here:

13 Comments on "How Accurate Were the Nevada Republican Caucus Results?"

  1. How is it not obvious that the system for counting votes is tainted as fuck.  Sorry, but profanity is the exclamation point.  And I can not be nice about it anymore.

    Ron Paul is our President regardless of what is said by the media and the system entrusted to count the votes.   The company that owns the computers is an Israeli company.  They do not want Ron Paul, too bad, we Americans do.

    I’m so mad right now I can’t see straight.  But please, research this and prove me wrong. Prove me wrong so I can be enlightened.

    • Mr Willow | Feb 8, 2012 at 6:05 am |

      They do not want Ron Paul, too bad, we Americans do.

      I will thank you to not over-generalise with that sentiment. 

      • Well the Americans who are opposed to NDAA, The Fed, Endless War and the Bankrupting of our Economy.  Those Americans 😉

        • Mr Willow | Feb 8, 2012 at 7:40 am |

          I guess the Americans who oppose those things but are also terrified of what corporations will do once all regulations are removed don’t count.

          After all, they probably don’t own property. . .

          • Sytallix | Feb 8, 2012 at 9:20 pm |

            Comments like these just amaze me, how long do these corporations and banks have to shit down your throat before you wake up and realize these so called regulations do not apply in any way, shape or form to big business.  They’re sole perpose is to controll the average person and stop any form of competition that threaten the those running things.

            “Competition is a sin.” – John D. Rockefeller

          • Mr Willow | Feb 9, 2012 at 4:12 am |

            Regulation is simply a restriction placed upon big business—i.e. restricting it from reducing mountain ranges to rubble, restricted from exploited people in the form of unlivable wages, the use of child labour, and inadequate safety precautions, restricting it from chopping down every tree of every forest, restricting it from dumping toxic waste into the rivers that supply cities with water, restricting it from gambling with people’s life savings they put in the bank for safe keeping etc. etc. ad nauseum. Because without the explicit restriction, big business will pursue all courses of action mentioned and more in their desire to acquire more profit.

            These things were not created by the government because it sought to control business, their creation was demanded by the people who had been traumatized or injured and the families of people who had been killed by their absence. 

            It makes perfect sense why Rockefeller (and those like him) abhor competition, for competition means that the monopoly they want isn’t complete. 

        • Anarchy Pony | Feb 10, 2012 at 12:25 am |

          Plenty of us don’t want those things or Paul.

          • It’s fine.  Would you be willing to risk another 4 – 8 years of Obama/Romney and have Zero chance of repealing NDAA, The Patriot Act. The Fed, Or ending the Illegal Wars?  Would you be willing to endure 4 years of Paul to help the greater good regarding those issues?  

    • Israel isn’t denying Paul the nomination.  The Republican Party is.

      • Captainobvious | Feb 8, 2012 at 11:18 am |

        Thank you for stating the obvious again Andrew. Your so perceptive. If only any three-year old would replace you on this blog.

  2. marklar_primus | Feb 8, 2012 at 5:28 am |

    Rigged as a WWE match. That’s why I plan to write in The Big Show come election day.


    least intelligent speculative article since the taco bell abortion fast!
    wait that was after this!
    MY BRAIN!!!

Comments are closed.