Breitbart’s Video Footage Shows Obama With Weather Underground

Interesting how the MSM is completely ignoring this aspect of Andrew Breitbart’s untimely death.  He was set to release the footage in question on March 1st, the day of his sudden and unexpected death … Paul Joseph Watson writes at

The footage that Andrew Breitbart planned to release just hours after his untimely death would have proven hugely damaging to President Obama’s re-election hopes, because it shows Obama fraternizing with Weather Underground terrorists whose goal it was to set up a Communist dictatorship inside the United States.

According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was assigned to infiltrate the Weather Underground’s Central Committee, the organization run by Bill Ayers carried out bombings targeting the Pentagon, the State Department, as well as police stations and federal buildings, in an attempt to cause the United States government to collapse and open the door for Cuban, North Vietnamese, Chinese and Russian troops to occupy the country.

Grathwohl stated that Ayers and his group planned to deal with Americans who would try to resist this takeover by “establishing re-education centers in the south-west”. Asked what he would do with those who still refused to convert to communism, Ayers said that they would have to be “eliminated,” as in 25 million Americans would be killed in concentration camps…


79 Comments on "Breitbart’s Video Footage Shows Obama With Weather Underground"

  1. This is a bunch of racist propaganda and hokum!  And what does this video have to do with Obama???If there were truly some sort of link between Obama and the Weather Underground, this would have come out long before his second term!  

    Breibart was a conservative wingnut and operative, who spread lies and nonsense against liberal targets while purposely ignoring much bigger actual conspiracies like the GOP stealing of 2 elections and 911 fraud.  RIH Andrew.

    • Camron Wiltshire | Mar 3, 2012 at 10:46 am |

      Penny, different people fight different fights.  

      As for the videos in question, well, it’s rather ballsy for Breitbart to issue that he had such incendiary foogage and considering the implications for Obama if the come out I think it’s reasonable to assume Breitbart actually did have something. 

      We may see something come out in the next 2 weeks.

      Or it may be suppressed.  Who knows?  Why does it automatically equal racism in your mind though to have video implicating Obama (the international man of mystery)  as having a checkered past and rubbing shoulders with known anti-government terrorists?   

      We have evidence of countless politicians rubbing shoulders with known terrorists every time foreign diplomats visit the white house we have another instance of meeting with known terrorists on the books. Whether they be from China, Israel, Timor, Russia, you name it.  They are the real terrorists using state power to enslave and destroy.

       Does this thought crime offend you as well?  Is it not alright to point out when someone performs RACIST genocide upon populations?  What about Obama killing Africans?  Is that racist?  Do you care that he waged an illegal war without congressional sanction and murdered thousands of innocent Africans??  Do you?  

      If your going to invoke racism, at least be equal in your judgement, to not do so would be, well… racist after all.

      • OpenMinded | Mar 3, 2012 at 11:13 am |

         Camron Wiltshire, are you familiar with idiomatic saying “herding cats”?  Good luck with your attempts at injecting perspective, though…

        • Camron Wiltshire | Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 am |

          Yes all too familiar. Thank you for understanding.  

        • Julian Alien | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 pm |

          I use a helper firecrackers and a cast net,it also works with other animals under 180 lbs.

    • Commiekicker | Mar 3, 2012 at 2:06 pm |

      you may want to hold your comments until after you see Breibart’s video showing Obama with these commie fascist pieces of crap. You’re a self loathing maggot by the way. Funny how everyone who raises a question about Obama is automatically rascist. Rascism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another. Perhaps I am racsit because I believe the human race is infinitely superior to leftist socialist maoist commie sub human pigs such as yourself.

      • JohnFrancisBittrich | Mar 3, 2012 at 2:34 pm |

        careful, buddy or you’ll give yourself a heart attack just like Breitbart. Lighten up, go outside, get a hobby etc.

      • HardcoreMaterialist | Mar 3, 2012 at 5:00 pm |

        If it turns out he is affiliated with Weather Underground that will finally be a plus on his record.  As it stands now he only aids along the current oppressive regime.

      • Eric_D_Read | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:08 pm |

        Pssst….Communism and fascism are divergent ideologies. Plus, Obama is a corporatist shill with a really good line of bullshit. Pass it on.

        • Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:09 pm |

          hey! i completely agree and ‘liked’ your comment.

        • Ok, I’m a leftist but…the USSR was absolutely a fascist state. Fascism is not confined to the right or the left. Cuba? Fascism. North Korea? Fascism. All left wing, all totalitarian FASCIST states.

          • Eric_D_Read | Mar 4, 2012 at 10:55 am |

            Not quite. They were(are) totalitarian states. Totalitarianism =/= fascism. 
            Fascism goes deeper than that.  

          • Actually, Fascism IS confined to the right. Indeed that’s the very definition of it.

            Fascism is what you call it when a rightwing state goes all totalitarian extremist.

            Communism is what you call it when a leftwing state goes all totalitarian extremist.

            You could say both Fascism and Communism are totalitarian in that they allow for zero dissent, but that’s where the similarities end. Their approaches to how to run those states and the themse behind which they drive those ideas are entirely different.

            And by conflating the two, you’re simply demonstrating your ignorance of history. Nothing more.

          • What do they call it when a centrist state goes all totalitarian extremist?

          • Jin The Ninja | Mar 7, 2012 at 11:38 pm |


    • Julian Alien | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:12 pm |

       It did come out years ago,you were not paying attention then…put down the joint.

    • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 8:59 am |

      LOL  Love how you start right off with the racist crap…did you not get the memo?  That card is played out.  The article says that Breitbart had video of Obama hanging out with the Weather Underground.  Since neither Ayers or Dorhn are racists, and surely just showing video of Obama when he is younger cannot be racist, what exactly are you basing your claims on anyway?  BTW, Obama has not yet had his second term and no one yet knows how Breitbart came by this footage…I’m sure if Obama’s crew had known it still existed, it would have been destroyed along with the rest of Obama’s records which have mysteriously disappeared.

  2. Bonertime | Mar 3, 2012 at 11:02 am |

    This is all bullshit, Breitbart was bullshit. Everything is bullshit. Breitbart had dinner with the assholes he opposes right before he died… Everything is bullshit. You don’t lose if you play for both teams.. remember that.

    • Commiekicker | Mar 3, 2012 at 1:57 pm |

      Breitbart was invited to a dinner with Ayers by Tucker Calson. Carlson bid on it for charity and basically wanted to see the fireworks erupt between Breitbart and Ayers. Breitbart had a list of questions for Ayers, proabably in relation to the new video of our communist president that will be shown shortly. However, Ayers ended the dinner abruptly and sent everyone hom. You make it sound like it was some secret dinner between old friends. No, only Obama has those with Ayers. You are bullshit. You eat it, and spew it and believe it.  

      • Misinformation | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:16 pm |

         Psst, I have another secret for you. This one can be found in the technology known as, “history”. The same people financed the Soviet socialist model, the German National socialist model and the U.S. welfare socialist model. Shhhh.

    • Phreduardo | Mar 5, 2012 at 5:12 pm |

       He was the meat pressed in the asshole sandwich, you say?

  3. Wait — here’s why this is old news and dumb:

    Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn had their charges dropped by Reagan’s justice department years after the Weather Underground activity. Obama was about 13 when the WU was actually active.

    Both Ayers and Dohrn went on to become major figures in Chicago education reform. Ayers is a professor at U of Illinois – Chicago, and his wife set up a non-profit law firm that works on education issues — like small-school initiatives and those voucher programs Republicans love.

    They got on-board with a small-school initiative through the Woods Fund of Chicago, which had plenty of Republican support.

    Obama was at the time involved in local and state politics, and was part of the same initiative in the 1990s.

    There’s your link. They built small schools in Chicago.

    Story over.

    •  “There’s your link. They built small schools in Chicago.

      Story over.”

      Not until this carefully edited footage reaches the intertubes, and shows that Barack Obama invented time travel and helped build robot suicide bombers to bring down the Chamber of Commerce.  That Breitbart!  Always digging deeper to get to the TRUTH!

    • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 9:20 am |

      If the link was truly so innocent, then why did Obama and the media bend over backwards in their attempt to convince voters that Ayers was “just a guy in the neighborhood”?  Surely Obama could have made the same link you just did instead of denying anything but the most casual contact with Ayers.  BTW, Ayers is not all sweetness and light even today…just recently he regetted not having done more during his time as a member of Weather Underground.  He and his wife a pretty much home grown terrorist scum yet today and use their positions to influence American youth in negative ways.

      • One: He didn’t try to hide any connection. He appeared at public board meetings with Ayers, and Ayers held a public fundraiser for Obama. It wasn’t hidden.

        Two: Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhood by the time Obama knew him. Recall that one important part of my first post: Charges were dropped against Ayers and Dohrn by Ronald Reagan’s justice department.

        I’ll repeat that: Charges were dropped against Ayers and Dohrn by Ronald Reagan’s justice department. In the 1980’s.

        Three: Don’t resort to sophism; Ayers “regret” was not so recent. He stated that in his memoir, which was published in the first week of September, 2001 — very, very, very bad timing, but hardly recent. And Ayers and the FBI agent who was on his case for years since went on a book tour together giving talks about that time. If the FBI agent assigned to him is willing to appear in public with the guy, does that make the FBI an accessory to terrorism too?

        Four: Ayers and Dohrn have used their position — with the support of conservatives as well as liberals — to improve schools in Chicago and to create new models for inner-city education. I’ve toured many of these schools, and they’re held to extremely high standards, higher than other public schools and voucher schools because they’re under such a microscope as a new model. But if they were terrorists, please explain how they were on the run for a decade yet magically had this “position” as you call it? Because “in the neighborhood,” they did a lot to earn it and to do something productive rather than destructive.

        Again, Obama was about 13 when Ayers and Dohrn were blowing things up. If that’s you’re connection, you are also an accessory to any crime committed by anyone you’ve ever associated with.

    • LOL! They weren’t pardoned by Reagan!

      • Okay, Reagan’s justice department dropped charges against Ayers and Dohrn after they had been on the run for 11 years and turned themselves in on Dec. 3, 1980. Dohrn was then put on probation.

        Did you check anything before you LOL’d?

  4. mole_face | Mar 3, 2012 at 12:21 pm |

    Damn… if I had known back in 08 that Obama was affiliated with the Weather Underground, it definitely would’ve changed my mind about voting for the guy.

    If I could do it all over again now, I definitely would’ve voted for Obama instead of Nader. 

  5. Hadrian999 | Mar 3, 2012 at 1:55 pm |

    how was this even remotely news, the obama/ayers association is pretty common knowledge especially among the breitbart target audience

    • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 9:24 am |

      Well of course the association was known to those who cared to vet Obama back in ’08, but the media and the Obama administration walked a tightrope in denying their relationship.  Until we see the video we can’t know for sure, but my guess is that the video simply proves that Obama lied about their relationship.  But now we know that Obama lies about most everything, so I won’t come as a surprise to anyone who does not live in a state of denial about Obama, that Gov. Palin was correct when she said that Obama palled around with terrorists.

  6. I watched that whole goddam video waiting for it to show “Obama with Weather Underground” and I didn’t see or hear shit.

  7. Rick Blaine | Mar 3, 2012 at 2:25 pm |


  8. Yeah…cool. I love you man. Peace

    • Camron Wiltshire | Mar 3, 2012 at 4:28 pm |

      I would visit  to get more info on the entire spectacle. 

      • Paper Tiger | Mar 3, 2012 at 5:18 pm |

         How much are they paying you to shill that shit?

        • Camron Wiltshire | Mar 4, 2012 at 12:19 pm |

          500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 theoretical dollars!!!! 

  9. Hmm, one question: where is Obama in this video? did I miss something?

  10. Shirley Acorn | Mar 3, 2012 at 2:44 pm |

    I don’t think any video from Breitbart would’ve proven damaging. So far, they’ve all been proven frauds.

  11. Camron Wiltshire | Mar 3, 2012 at 4:31 pm |

    Andrew Breitbart Just Another Weird Death:

    Moving out of the left right paradigm towards the reality of state sponsored assassination of political enemies.

    • Hadrian999 | Mar 3, 2012 at 5:14 pm |

      you think an overweight middle aged man in poor health with rage issues having an apparent heart attack weird, it may in fact be a hit but nothing appears out of order, though i must admit I cant wait for the results of the toxicology

    • Redacted | Mar 3, 2012 at 5:21 pm |

      I think Ron Paul killed him by boring him to death with one of his tl;dr speeches.

      • Julian Alien | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:38 pm |

        You would have to be an American citizen,and educated to a certain degree,to understand what Ron is talking about.

        • Redacted | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:45 pm |

          If by “educated” you mean “High School drop out” then you have indeed described Ron Paul’s supporters. You people need to get a job and move out of mommy’s basement.

        • Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 10:31 pm |

          lol. educated? not in a school or by books surely.

  12. Redacted | Mar 3, 2012 at 4:57 pm |

    Communist Terrorists? I had no idea Obama associated himself with such enlightened people. What happened to turn him away from the light?

  13. Tchoutoye | Mar 3, 2012 at 5:17 pm |

    The video will still be released and it will turn out to be just another Fright-fart in a teacup, not making any dent in the campaign.

  14. Adamsshadow | Mar 3, 2012 at 6:08 pm |

    I’m guessing the only American citizen Obama has assassinated is Anwar al-Awlaki; I’m not buying this whole “totalitarian communist sleeper agents killed controversial political critic” line. The administration has more important people to murder.

    By the way, I felt the same way about the death of Paul Wellstone back in 2002.

  15. Mr Willow | Mar 3, 2012 at 6:47 pm |

    Breitbart’s Footage Shows Obama ‘Palling Around’ With Terrorists (headline of the source article)

    Boy, that takes me back. I haven’t heard that line since the ’08 campaign, when Roger Ailes’ was using a bunch of scare tactics to dissuade people voting for Obama. What’s next, something about Van Jones or Rev. Wright? 

    It didn’t stop people from voting for him then, and with a look at the GOP hopefuls, it won’t stop the people—who still consider representative politics desireable, or our current government legitimate—from voting for him again. I still say we should boycott the whole damn system. 

    Considering Obama has done nothing even remotely Communist, this is an utter crock. He’s done nothing for public education, nothing for public healthcare (insurance is still private under his healthcare plan), nothing for workers, nothing for the poor, and anything he has done to the benefit of any of these things, he’s been forced to concede and backpedal on by the Billionaire’s Guard that is the Republican Party. 

    • Julian Alien | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:08 pm |

      So you do not think that socialized medicine,starting wars without congressional approval,and NDAA  is remotely communist?

      • Mr Willow | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:51 pm |

        socialized medicine

        To reïterate, insurance is still private under Obama’s healthcare plan. That isn’t socialised medicine, as it isn’t being publicly provided. That is the real tragedy of the whole thing. The government should be mandating itself with providing its citizens with quality healthcare. Instead, it is mandating its citizens purchase private insurance. 

        starting wars without congressional approval

        Example of an overreach of authority, and, judging by the places those were started, imperialism, neither of which are communist in nature. In its conception, it is an economic system seeking to create a workers democracy. 


        Totalitarian and authoritarian. Again, nothing to do with communism, unless you’re trying to imply the Soviet Union was communist, which it wasn’t, as the workers didn’t own the means of production. The Soviet Union was little more than state capitalism—the state owned all the businesses, the dictator (Stalin), owned the state, ergo, he was the CEO of USSR Inc. 

        If he were actually Communist, he would be pumping money into public education, not allowing funding to be slashed nationwide; he would be pumping money into a state operated, state funded, and state owned healthcare system (like they have in England), instead of mandating the populace buy insurance from a bunch of vultures; he would be stripping private industry of all it’s power—giving it to the workers—instead of further relenting to it, or trying to appease its owners, further enriching them; and, at the very least, he would be advocating raising the taxes on the wealthiest people in this country to the levels of the mid 40s (91%), or even to its levels during the 50s (88%), instead of having this feeble ‘Oh, maybe I’ll let the Bush tax-cuts expire’ attitude.

      • Didn’t know that Anthem, BlueCross BlueShield, Aetna, and Humana were branches of the government. (I always thought they were Chase, Monsanto, Fox News and Blackwater 🙂

        Didn’t know Dubya was a Left-wing Democrat who learned is politics at the feet of Gus Hall.

        Didn’t know that the Nazis, the dictatorships from South America, or the Islamist theocracies let their people run wild and free in the streets…..

        • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 9:34 am |

          Obamacare mandates what those health insurance companies can and cannot cover, what profits they can and cannot make, who they can and cannot chose to cover, what they must provide for “free” and what they can charge a premium for…so while Obamacare has not yet kicked in, other than a few giveaways that Obama thought he needed to start early in order to get elected, we ARE going to see private companies merged with the new government offices created by Obamacare.  The companies will be allowed to operate ONLY if they comply with overbearing new government healthcare mandates (not regulations…mandates, there is a difference).  While this may not be complete government takeover of a private company, it is certainly heading in that direction.

      • Forget Communist, I wish he was even a Liberal.

  16. Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 6:57 pm |

    Can anyone name 1 single ‘leftist’ policy Obama has ever enacted in 4 years? Anyone? Anyone?
    This debate is ridiculous. Obama is at the very least a very pragmatic centrist, although I find his brand of neo-liberal economics (‘ form of economic liberalism that emphasizes the efficiency of private enterprise, liberalized trade, and relatively open markets.’) corporateering, war mongering, anti-immigrant , anti universal healthcare, anti education very right wing. Not to mention filling his entire cabinet with right wing technocrats and banksters.

    Even a moderated social democratic left would be embarassed by how far to the right the entire discourse and policies has shifted, and that same moderated social democratic left (of any country) has never been particularly influential in america- because of anti unionism (1920s) and the communist fervor of the 1950s, nor has it been effective in quelling either capitalism, globalisation, privatisation in the 3rd world. neo-libealism or even neo imperialism.

    So why is some reich wing shill de-legitimising legitimate criticism of obama? and that’s exactly what this is- if all his critics are fascist racist nazi’s how is the left ever supposed to be empowered enough
    to ‘formulate a critical and widely recieved response to representative politics, we’re the anti fascist, and all this does is make any kind of serious intellectual historical analysis impossible.

    seems like a disinfo opp to me.

    • Misinformation | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:20 pm |

       He’s big on welfare programs. You know, like the auto industry and Wall st. bailouts, stuff like that.

      • Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:40 pm |

        that’s corporatism (on the right). it’s not in any way an example of leftist policy.

        • Misinformation | Mar 3, 2012 at 7:57 pm |

           tomato / tomahto

        • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 9:39 am |

          The bailout of the auto companies had nothing to do with corporatism…it was merely a pay off to the unions which had donated big bucks to his campaign.  Obama by passed American bankruptcy law and threw the shareholders under the bus in order to hand big bucks over to his donors.  His big push for solar energy has turned out to be just another pay out to his donors.  If we had any media left, someone would do the research and show the world how corrupt this guy actually is.

          • Jin The Ninja | Mar 5, 2012 at 12:42 pm |

            obama is corrupt no doubt about it, but to blame the unions? lay off the rush buddy, he’s a liar. obama is a corporatist marketeer no matter what they’re telling you- look at any of his business policies, and look at his relationship with unions. he hasn’t pushed for solar very strongly in fact he’s pushing for an oil pipeline. keystone?

      • Hadrian999 | Mar 3, 2012 at 8:31 pm |

         transferring public resources into corporate control…..thats exactly what marx and engels were talking about.

        • Misinformation | Mar 3, 2012 at 8:52 pm |

           Wow, I didn’t think I could’ve laid the sarcasm any thicker in that my initial reply but you guys require a solid mass…

          And any way, what would a leftist policy look like exactly?

          • Hadrian999 | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:12 pm |

             hell I would settle for even a modest attempt to check the control corporations have over the lives of citizens and the government, sadly the entire system is a sham, both sides take their orders and get their payoffs from the same people and both sides are infested with goldman sachs operatives, it wont change until someone burns the whole thing down

          • Misinformation | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:19 pm |

             That’s good to hear. For a minute I thought there were people who actually thought the U.S. president would change the way government worked.

          • falling321 | Mar 5, 2012 at 9:45 am |

            Oh don’t worry, he is waiting until his second term to do the really nasty stuff…right now he is busy making sure he gets his big donors paid back.  The man is crooked through and through.  BTW, burn it all down and watch exactly the same people rise from the ashes.  Those who are successful now will be successful in any new government, those who hold their hand out for someone to fill, rarely make it into the corporate world for a reason…and that reason is NOT that the “man” keeps them down…they keep themselves down!

          • Phreduardo | Mar 5, 2012 at 5:15 pm |

             waiting until the second term to …. oh yeah, Daily Show gave us a succinct view of what to look forward to.  feel free to review it.

          •  Try this on as the centre of the political spectrum, ‘Universal Health Care’, any policy more socialist than that is left anything more driven by greed is right of that.
            This can be proven by the support of ring wing politics to universal health care around the globe, ignore the screaming rants of far right wing mass media politics and the tea baggers.

    • Julian Alien | Mar 3, 2012 at 9:33 pm |

      You are talking about right and left and I am talking about good and evil.Republicans got their start as anti slavery dudes who wanted to start their own party with ideas that are still just as relevant in today’s society.The Democratic party was started by a bunch of racist murderers like Andrew Jackson that like something for nothing.Proclaiming “Manifest Destiny”they campaigned to wipe my ancestors off the map.Now they are the same party disguised as opposites.The two headed snake has clouded many minds.Put down that opiate which is mainstream media and seek the truth.

      • Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 10:16 pm |

      • Jin The Ninja | Mar 3, 2012 at 10:23 pm |

        what you said is about as cogent as any metis, inuit or status native person in canada advocating for the conservative party and stephen harper, whom have time and time again not only defended paternalist victorian policies toward native peoples, but engage in their outrite destruction through environmental exploitation (tar sands anyone????) and land seizing (OKA!?!?).

  17. . . . O_o

    That is all.

  18. MoralDrift | Mar 3, 2012 at 11:48 pm |

    I have a theory that WU was actually COINTELPRO.  Mainly to discredit SDS and other radical groups that actually weren’t batshit insane.

    For starters…even if you wanted to institute a communist dictatorship…who in their right mind would actually invite Soviet troops onto their territory? I think anyone that was moderately versed in marxism and current affairs would know that the USSR was no proper model…as the Yugoslavians and Chinese were well aware.  
    Not that the other brands were much better, the point is it is hard to imagine a person who wasnt being paid to discredit legitimate movements to advocate for concentration camps, Soviet occupation (Vietnamese even more silly), and to do so not through a mass movement of people but through terrorist acts…! come on its fucking intel job. Wonder why they were pardoned and have cushy jobs….

  19. mxyzptlk…you need to do a little more research. Bill Ayers was never convicted of any of his crimes beause he stood behind the women who took the fall like a coward. Therefore , could have never been pardoned. BILL CLINTON pardoned the others NOT Ronald Regan. Furthermore, The Weather Underground never dissolved until 1985, at which time Obama would have been 24 not 13.
    Conclusion? Story NOT over….

    • Charges were dropped against Ayers (and other Weathermen) due to FBI misconduct. BOTH Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton pardoned members of Weather Underground. WU became defunct after the Brinks robbery in 1981. Obama was 21. Ayers was 37, and all the Weathermen were born before 1950–making them at least a decade older than Obama. The man in the video above monitored the WU in 1970, when Obama was 9. 

  20. Chicago = corruption… no question about that.  Governors, mayors, PRESIDENTS with ties to Chicago are suspect from the get-go.. 

  21. Phreduardo | Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 pm |

    Even more obviously effectual than it was to watch Bush smooch Saud on the lawn and to ferry his folk out of town for three happy NOTAM days somewhere around 9/11 … yup should’ve nipped his presidency in the bud, huh?  Who cares what that sniveling coward has to say. Give his words back to him in whimpers over his shallow grave.

Comments are closed.