Human Demonology: LulzSec and the Betrayal of Sabu

SabuP. Emerson Williams writes on Modern Mythology:

LulzSec are the Daily Mail readers’ wet dream and were probably dreamt up and promoted by like/right-minded journalists in the service of the Stazi State. —The Guardian Comment 29 June 2011 6:09AM

Last year was marked by a seeming endless thread of DDOS attacks and new video declarations, tying in or not, intersecting or not with boots on the ground protesting across the cities of the West. Common wisdom among anti-authoritarian types was that the establishment was too big and lumbering to ever catch up with or even understand any of this. (Also see: the “piracy” issue.) Large financial institutions, big media and government looked form the outside to be playing whack-a-mole, running defense against the actions of Anonymous and Wikileaks.

Recent acts of Anonymous, or more specifically Lulzsec include the interception and release of an FBI conference call, and a dump of five million emails exchanged between emplyees of intelligence firm Stratfor, the publication of which by WikiLeaks made headlines. Not the massive coverage the Cablegate release garnered, but after the loss of the Bank of America documents in a manner suspicious to all but the most credulous, this is understandable. The fact that these emails were supplied by Lulzsec did make the ears of conspiracy spotter prick up. This cooperation between Anonymous and Wikileaks fit the narrative that has both parties being part of a massive psyop …

[Full article]

Follow Me


They'll really publish anyone these days won't they?
Follow Me

2 Comments on "Human Demonology: LulzSec and the Betrayal of Sabu"

  1. Camron Wiltshire | Mar 9, 2012 at 11:43 pm |

    Interesting.  Makes sense and this was again spotted by the “Alex Jone’s” crowd about a year ago I believe. 

     “Generally, when there’s enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news.” What about 9/11?  “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” What about the Bilderberg conference? “That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes.”

    So Assange can unload 5 million emails from Stratfor but he can’t manage to google Building 7?  The best place to hide things is right out in the open.  Or is it that he might get Breitbarted the moment he contests such a “sacred myth” with all of wikileaks pull? 

    Thanks for posting.  

Comments are closed.