Why Walking Is Political

Commuters-on-railway-stat-008Via the Guardian, Will Self argues for the symbolic, basic importance of walking as a force against corporate and state control:

Put bluntly: deprived of mechanized means of locomotion – the car, the bus, the train – and without the aid of technology, the majority of urbanites, who constitute the vast majority of Britons, neither know where they are, nor are capable of getting somewhere else under their own power.

Year on year, the number of journeys taken on foot declines – indeed, on current projections walking will have died out altogether as a means of transport by the middle of this century. Now we are alienated from the physical reality of our cities.

Read More: Guardian

8 Comments on "Why Walking Is Political"

  1. Sweet_and_lowdown | Apr 7, 2012 at 5:23 pm |

    blah blah blah. re-hashed situationist gibberish. 

    • Jin The Ninja | Apr 7, 2012 at 6:38 pm |

      you’ve never read Baudelaire have you? the concept of the ‘flaneur’ or ‘flannerie’ is far older than situationism. So, in many ways your above post is gibberish.

  2. blah blah | Apr 8, 2012 at 12:15 am |

    No im pretty sure this article is jibberish 

  3. DisinfoForumsAreFunny | Apr 8, 2012 at 7:33 am |

    Free will.  Walk yourself to work, or don’t.  Walk yourself to the grocery store, or don’t.  Walk yourself to the bar, or don’t.  Walk yourself to the corner store, or don’t.  What’s the discussion about here?  Are Jetson style walkways the wave of the future?  Still waiting on my hoverboard McFly…

  4. Walking, is just one step away from the socialist concept of jobs for life. Of balanced economies,  of zero growth policies and of and end to the offensively rich who consume and pollute beyond all measures of sanity.

  5. it’s saying no to marketing expectations, people think i’m crazy for not wanting to drive a car when i could

Comments are closed.