Ron Paul on The Real Costs Of War

Ron Paul PeaceRon Paul writes on the Daily Bell:

This month Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric K. Shinseki announced the addition of some 1,900 mental health nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers to its existing workforce of 20,590 mental health staff in attempt to get a handle on the epidemic of suicides among combat veterans. Unfortunately, when presidents misuse our military on an unprecedented scale – and Congress lets them get away with it – the resulting stress causes military suicides to increase dramatically, both among active duty and retired service members. In fact, military deaths from suicide far outnumber combat deaths. According to an article in the Air Force Times this month, suicides among airmen are up 40 percent over last year.

Considering the multiple deployments service members are forced to endure as the war in Afghanistan stretches into its second decade, these figures are sadly unsurprising.

Ironically, the same VA Secretary Eric Shinseki was forced to retire from the Army by President Bush for daring to suggest that an invasion and occupation of Iraq would not be the cakewalk that neoconservatives promised. Then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who is not a military veteran, claimed that General Shinseki was “wildly off the mark” for suggesting that several hundred thousand soldiers would be required to secure post-invasion Iraq. Now we see who was right on the costs of war.

Read More: Daily Bell

8 Comments on "Ron Paul on The Real Costs Of War"

  1. inb4 butthurt

  2. We just got finished pumping 7.7 trillion into the ‘private sector’ and how did that work out for us?

  3. Redacted | May 2, 2012 at 1:54 pm |

    Amazing how Shinseki knew more about war than Wolfowitz. It’s almost like he’s a General or something.

  4. Masflojo | May 2, 2012 at 4:43 pm |

    I like how Ron Paul cites Stiglitz… an economist he and every belief he has, strongly disagrees with. 

  5. PhiloSlacker | May 2, 2012 at 8:18 pm |

    Yeah he might be right about war, but that’s not an important quality for president.  He’s wrong about evolution, which is far more important.

    • Apathesis | May 3, 2012 at 7:34 am |

      Not an important quality for a president?

    •  how is evolution more important than war?  or, i should say, more relevant?  evolution doesn’t put bullets into your flesh or drop bombs on your wedding party.

Comments are closed.