Message to the Voting Cattle – Larken Rose

Via LarkenRose.com:

28 Comments on "Message to the Voting Cattle – Larken Rose"

  1. Monkey See Monkey Do | Aug 11, 2012 at 4:26 am |

    Project much?

  2. David Howe | Aug 11, 2012 at 8:51 am |

    Remember that Obama was secretly married to a Pakistani man and Romney beat up a gay guy in school.  But which one do you want to appoint someone to the supreme court? They have both benefitted the plutocracy, but only one of them has cut middle class taxes (the other one promises to raise them).  One of them is chipping away at discrimination while one is pandering to every conceiveable type of bigotry in this country.  It’s not quite Coke and Pepsi.  It’s more like choosing between chemo and aura cleansing.  You might die both ways, but you have a strong chance of surviving one.  You will NOT survive the other.

    • Obama kills black people, I guess if I want to chalk that up to racism I have to blame his white half?  Extrajudicial killings, infinite surveillance, indefinite detention.  Screwed either way.  I think it’s time we stop pretending the system works and spend our time becoming educated as to our unalienable rights while also exposing the greatest crimes of our age to help even those most deeply in denial begin the process of waking up to the nature of our current duopoly permanent war economy and governance.  

      • David Howe | Aug 11, 2012 at 12:06 pm |

        Fair enough, but refusal to vote or voting for alternative candidates leads to fucking Republicans in the White House, on the Supreme Court, and in Congress.  You can’t fight everything at once and you can’t find a pure candidate.  Pick the least worst.  the choice is clear.

    • That chemo and aura  analogy is really an amazing way of putting it, especially since depending on who is reading it, they won’t know which one you are saying you will not survive and which you will.

  3. David Howe | Aug 11, 2012 at 8:51 am |

    Remember that Obama was secretly married to a Pakistani man and Romney beat up a gay guy in school.  But which one do you want to appoint someone to the supreme court? They have both benefitted the plutocracy, but only one of them has cut middle class taxes (the other one promises to raise them).  One of them is chipping away at discrimination while one is pandering to every conceiveable type of bigotry in this country.  It’s not quite Coke and Pepsi.  It’s more like choosing between chemo and aura cleansing.  You might die both ways, but you have a strong chance of surviving one.  You will NOT survive the other.

  4. Rodney Volkmar | Aug 11, 2012 at 9:48 am |

    OMG, this guy totally nailed it

  5. Apathesis | Aug 11, 2012 at 10:52 am |

    If you vote for either Romney or Obama, you vote like a coward.

  6. Gotta go to work early today, but at 40 seconds I knew where this was going.  Good post.  NOTHING is as it SEEMS!  I find these are words to live by.

  7. floweringmind | Aug 11, 2012 at 12:52 pm |

    There has to be better things to support than the view of some crazy person babbling hate. Go plant a garden and shut up. For that matter everyone go plant a garden. Grow some food like most of the world used to do, instead of bitching about how horrible it. Get the hell off the net and go create some beauty. Rebuild your creative mind and make something for the holy in nature.

  8. Do any of you even know who Larken Rose is or what his real agenda is?

     http://www.quatlosers.com/larken_rose.htm

    • Monkey See Monkey Do | Aug 11, 2012 at 2:50 pm |

      Thanks for the link, very informative. Certain scam artists and get rich schemers can be hard to spot for some people.

    • Old tactic, if you can’t realistically attack the message, kill the messenger.  The same things said in this film have been said by many including one of the Gamble children (of Proctor-Gamble) in his rather recent film Ethos, and the books that Russ Kick edited for this very site. 

      Does the veracity of the messenger negate the message if the messenger speaks the truth?  Not necessarily.

      Is the message flawed if someone has figured out how to cash in on the message?  If so there is no one on a successful website who can then be trusted.

      Pardon me but I thought we were talking about the contents of the film not doubting the ancestry of the one who delivered it…    

    • As to the link, shall we see what a neutral site has to say?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larken_Rose#Larken_Rose

    • ” The conduct of Larken Rose,” said Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, “is an affront to all taxpayers who VOLUNTARILY (emphasis mine) pay the taxes required by law.”    So by deciding not to “voluntarily” pay the income tax he is pissing off the sheep who do?  
      Do you enjoy $lavery so much as to attempt to derail someone who raises legitimate challenges to the abuse of the system?  Are you happy to pay an income tax that is nothing more than legalized theft through deception and threat of violence?

  9. Larken Rose's Webmaster | Oct 15, 2012 at 8:33 am |

    Take it from the horse’s mouth. Not someone else’s horse.

    http://www.larkenrose.com

  10. Larken Rose's Webmaster | Oct 15, 2012 at 8:33 am |

    Take it from the horse’s mouth. Not someone else’s horse.

    http://www.larkenrose.com

Comments are closed.