Who Owns The World?

By on October 27, 2012 in News 33

Via Democracy Now

, , , , , , , , , , ,

  • mole_face

    Amy Goodman and Noam Chomsky are New World Order Shills. Why the fuck would you listen to these Illuminati clowns when you can listen to an ex-Navy Seal who was a wrestler in the WWF?

    • Andrew

      Good one! I’m not entirely sure that Ventura wouldn’t get along with Goodman and Chomsky, though.

    • Jin The Ninja

      can you please explain to me what NWO means.

      • http://www.facebook.com/eric.fischer.73 Eric Fischer
      • Andrew

        Same as the Old World Order.

      • oddysey_41

        new world order

        • Jin The Ninja

          as an acronym, yes. but how does it apply to chomsky and goodman?

          • Anarchy Pony

            The nwo conspiracy nutters like to think of Noam and people commenting from a similar perspective as “gatekeepers”, because they aren’t mainstream, but they don’t go full Monty on the conspiracy garbage, so Q.E.D. they must be complicit collaborators.

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            He was joking.

          • Jin The Ninja

            thanks ted, but it was rather obvious.

      • oddysey_41

        one worldwide government

        • Jin The Ninja

          not quite.

      • mole_face

        Of course – the NWO was a group of maverick pro wrestlers who tried to take over the WWF back in the 90s. Considering Ventura’s long and illustrious career with the WWF, it totally makes sense that he’d be upset with the NWO for their attempted coup d’etat. But Jeez man – it’s been years… you should just let it go already.

    • David Howe

      whatever you’re doing, it’s not really working

      • mole_face

        Really? Shit.

        My total dick of a supervisor has been really riding my back lately – and if that fat bald shapeshifting reptilian douchebag thinks that I’m not successfully advancing the elite agenda online, he’s likely to demote me. Then I take a pay cut and end up being assigned to the comments section at Infowars instead. And it’s such a pain in the ass to deal with those survivalist Bircher fuckers eight hours a day.

        • Calypso_1

          HA!

        • David Howe

          still not funny

          • Andrew

            I thought it was funny. But then, I got it.

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            You need more sex and alcohol in your life! Weed helps too.

  • Matt Staggs
  • Rômulo Vieira

    And this is from a guy who thinks 9/11 was a “normal” act of terrorism.

    • David Howe

      correct. it’s the direction of the terrorism that was different.

  • BuzzCoastin

    listening to Chomsky has been declared the cure for insomnia
    right after Bible reading

    • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

      yeah, reading him is better. Of course once you “get” him no need to read more.

      • Calypso_1

        Have you read his works on linguistics? Or do you ‘get’ those too?

        • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

          What?

          • Matt Staggs

            I see what you did there. :)

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            Ha ha!

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            Ha ha!

  • kowalityjesus

    I would not take at face value any information coming from a person with a thick ring of godless sycophants. That being said, there is obviously substantial political value in the facts Chomsky brings to light.

    • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

      I hear he likes Koalas, though.

    • David Howe

      godless? that’s the best kind of syncophant!

      • kowalityjesus

        The kind that yearns for an odium indignitatis to fill that utter void within themselves.

        “One modestly sits ‘at the Master’s feet and guards against having one’s own thoughts. Mental laziness becomes a virtue…through his deification one grows in stature…Naturally the disciples close in together, not out of love, but for the very understandable purpose of effortlessly confirming their own convictions by engendering a collective agreemnet.”

        C.G. Jung