Sex With A Skeleton!

Himeji Oshiro Matsuri Ju10 004Does sex get any kinkier than this? From Reuters:

A woman in Sweden has been charged with engaging in sexual activities with a human skeleton and could face jail time for disturbing the peace of the dead, a Swedish prosecutor said.

Police found a full human skeleton, skulls and a box containing other human bones by chance after responding to a call saying a shot had been fired from her flat in the city of Gothenburg.

They also discovered CD-ROMs titled “my necrophilia” and “my first experience”, and photographs of the woman engaging in various sexual activities with a skeleton, a court document on the prosecutor’s website showed.

It said the woman had handled the bones in a “shameful” and “unethical” manner…

[continues at Reuters]


Majestic is gadfly emeritus.

Latest posts by majestic (see all)

19 Comments on "Sex With A Skeleton!"

  1. I guess she really liked to “bone”.

  2. “Gothenburg”
    Says it all really.

  3. What is this? I don’t even-

  4. BuzzCoastin | Nov 26, 2012 at 12:28 am |

    >Police found a full human skeleton, skulls and a box containing other human bones by chance

    “by chance” sounds like SOP for Swedish pigs

    unless she’s killing people to have sex with them
    I fail to see how this is a legal matter
    if a midget, a cop, a horse and a skeleton want to have sex in the privacy of their bedroom
    how does that involve public scrutiny, if not done in public?

    • A few years back, a couple of guys “obtained” the skull of a child and used it as their flat ashtray. Do you think that’s acceptable?

      • BuzzCoastin | Nov 26, 2012 at 2:46 am |

        there’s a huge difference between something being “unacceptable” and illegal

        Genghis Khan & the Mongols drank from the skulls of their defeat foes
        to them
        that was totally acceptable

        Socrates liked to bugger young boys
        was that acceptable? it was then

        • I’ll rephrase. Do you think the people who took the skull should be punished as criminals (as with this women who had the remains of others)? Or, because they weren’t doing it in public, they (she) should be free to continue with their morbid pastimes?

          • BuzzCoastin | Nov 26, 2012 at 4:38 am |

            I think you’re going for some kinda logical conundrum
            where I say that people who rob graves for ashtrays
            and this girl are somehow equivalent or something
            not sure what you’re headed for

            but if you’re asking if people’s weird fetishes should be made illegal
            the answer is no
            if you’re asking me is it ok to rob graves
            only if the graves are over 100 years old
            then it’s call archeology

          • I was going to try push you till we found a gray line between a strange fetish and something that should be illegal.. Even in the confines of your own home… But decided I couldn’t be bothered.
            Not that I care about this women masturbating with some old bones anyway.

            On a totally unrelated note, I really like your new avatar.

          • BuzzCoastin | Nov 27, 2012 at 3:08 am |

            right on, for me the bigger issue here
            was also pointed out by the Swedish dude
            that cops can fuck with you with impunity in Sweden
            much like the US
            but the US has a semblance of civil rights

            as to the weird stuff people do
            the stuff Bush & Cheney et al did was far worse
            than digging up bones to fuck with
            and no cop is a cop to that shit

      • Brian Flowers | Nov 26, 2012 at 12:24 pm |

        why shouldn’t it be? I mean sure it’s unhealthy…but that’s the only serious issue I see with it. An empty skull is not a human being and should not be protected like one. Unless you can come up with a person who is being harmed by that, there’s no reason for it to be illegal.

        Granted, if they just stole it from some random grave then that’s theft and should be dealt with accordingly…but the act of using or owning a human skull isn’t really problematic. There _are_ places where you can legally buy human bones. And hell, nobody seems to complain about museums and collectors owning skeletons and human remains — why do they get different treatment just because they’re old or famous?

    • “its only illegal if you get caught” seems to apply here. I think people just don’t like to think about what could happen to their bodies after they kick it for good, its not rational but lately nothing ever is. There is also a market for oddities and laws could have been placed to stop people from trying to make a profit on the remains of the unwilling also cops use laws to take away rights when they cant just use brutal force, a cop out. I want to be cremated or shot into deep space, dont give me that osama burial at sea crap.

      • BuzzCoastin | Nov 26, 2012 at 3:02 am |

        people’s fascination with their remains after death seems odd to me
        you won’t be needing it, where ever it is you’re going
        what living people do with or to it will have no effect upon you, where ever you might be
        and this kind of weird-ass shit with the dead remains of humans
        has been going on since humans became humans
        and some of it was done by force of law
        and some was prohibited by force of law
        and all of it done by human nature

    • This is the reality in my country (Sweden). The police is allowed to do what ever they want. They dont need any proof for anything to go into your home and search it. They are allowed to take you or your friends from your couch and submit you to urintests. And when you are judged, it’s 4 laymen selected by the political government that sentence you. Not a jury by equals like in the US. So you are likely to be convicted everytime the gov. wants you too.

  5. InfvoCuernos | Nov 26, 2012 at 2:00 am |

    Quote of the day: ” She is interested in the dead.”

  6. Kay O. Sweaver | Nov 26, 2012 at 3:02 am |

    Louis CK recently did a bit about how he was going to donate his body after his death for people to use sexually, the rationale being that it was better to use his body for that than to have people with harmful sexual compulsions going out and victimizing the living.

  7. MadHierophant | Nov 26, 2012 at 4:58 am |

    bon·er /ˈbōnər/

    1. Noun:A stupid mistake.
    2. vulgar. An erection of the penis.


    • DeepCough | Nov 26, 2012 at 12:23 pm |

      Used in a sentence: “Boy, that skeleton must have had one hell of a…..boner.”

Comments are closed.