Occult Feminism and the Psychic Superiority of Women

One of the absolute creepiest things about the corporate media monolith created in the wake of deregulation is the way they have completely and seemingly irreparably poisoned the word feminism in the minds of the hoi polloi. Same shit they did with socialism and don’t even get me started on “entitlements”. Crap’s beyond infuriating, but what they’ve done to feminism is even more wretch inducing when you get down to it. I honestly had no idea how horrible this was until last week when I decided to peruse some comments sections on the topic. Bad idea.

Okay, so I suppose I probably knew it had gotten this sordid and simply avoided it like I do most things about depressing stuff. I can only handle so much of other people’s bitter realities, but the most mind-blowing and heinous aspect to the whole psychic bamboozle behind the anti-feminism crusade involves how they’ve turned so many young women off of the concept entirely. I could not fucking believe a few years back when it came to my attention that all the little hotties in my office shunned the word. What the fuck? There’s a reason I don’t associate with these people the second I clock out, but here’s the kicker: There was one girl among the group, seemingly an incredibly intelligent young woman who had even gone to the Middle East for the purpose of educating and empowering women while in college. When asked, this is what she wanted to pursue in life (although I know through the wonders of Facebook (friend me) that’s she’s not actually doing this). Guess what? When pressed, she didn’t consider herself a feminist because she associated that with “not being pretty”. Rush Limbaugh’s pilled out fear mongering lunacy was way more effective than I ever realized, god help us all.

Maybe I’m nuts but I always thought feminism meant, you know, women’s rights? Acknowledging the fact that women can do most things just as well if not better than men and maybe shouldn’t be treated like second class citizens. I guess I feel this way because I’m not completely retarded. Fuck, I think they’re more than a bit smarter than men in a lot of ways, which is sort of the point to this article. I mean, I’m a man so I absolutely know exactly how dumb we are. How the hell did feminism suddenly equate to fringe radical lesbian stuff in the minds of most creeps? I blame media de-regulation and rich assholes. I think these two factors can be directly attributed to a lot of society’s ills when you get right down to brass tacks though, so take that as you may.

But before we get into the whole mystical angle, let me just say a few things on the topic of sex relations. Truthfully, from time to time I read feminist pieces by women that make me cringe a bit as a man, and it’s mainly because the authors have exactly zero understanding or empathy for male psychology. On that note, let me further say that the majority of men I know make zero attempt to understand female psychology as well, so it’s hard to point fingers. We’re all a bunch of primitive monkeys, but because our culture is such a hyper-misogynist head fuck and has been since as long as we can remember, a lot of times women tend to forget that it can suck just as bad to have a penis. Men are exactly as big of assholes to other men as they are to women. Is it better to be a slave or a sex slave? A soldier or the wife who stays at home hoping the father of her child won’t get his balls blown off and she’ll have to cheat on him?

God, there is nothing about war that isn’t depressing unless you’re completely detached from the whole thing and looking at skyrocketing numbers on a spreadsheet. That’s sort of what you have to acknowledge as an overly masculine guy such as myself. Violence is sort of our thing. It’s an unchecked outgrowth of pure testosterone overload. Sure, you can focus on the fact that sometimes, every now and then, women sexually assault men and other women. What’s that, like 4 percent of all sexual assaults? How about murder, and I mean not just small town murders, but on the grand scale, throughout history? How many women have lead us into war for no reason (other than Margaret Thatcher)? Shit’s gotta be like 90% guys, optimistically? It’s the competitive hunter instinct embedded in us dudes run amok. It’s also the reason I watch basketball and porn like a crackhead, but I’ve got news for you, it has gotten way the fuck out of hand. Seeing as nearly every one I know does way too many drugs (and yes I consider alcohol a drug) or has some other damaging means of dealing with the horror wrought by their fucked up childhoods, I’d say maybe, just maybe, we’ve lost touch with the maternal nurturer in us. No one ever calls it father nature if you dig what I’m saying, but Mother Nature seems pissed.

Here’s where it gets odd. This isn’t material where I just said, hey, I’m going to write and focus my spiritual energies on understanding my creative feminine essence. Okay, wait, I did. My first book was actually a spell designed to do exactly that, among other things. You know what’s odd, when thinking about it in retrospect, I have zero conscious explanation to why I was pursuing this, but it sure as hell worked. The third mind was playing me like a puppet and it wasn’t until years later when I started a divine conversation with my holy guardian angel (friend me on Facebook) that it was explained in far greater detail. Let me break it down. There was a previous civilization predating us based on a more feminine shamanic science. Our era’s purpose was to develop a masculine domination of the material realm. Now the two sides, the Yin and the Yang, Chaos and Order, Structure and Anti-Structure, are going to combine to form something quite deliciously new and extravagant. That’s where we’re headed, and if you weren’t following closely enough, that means towards a more balanced feminine culture. These things take long periods of time to say the least.

But wait, that’s crazy? Yeah, when you hear voices in your head you’d tend to think that wouldn’t you? The problem comes when what they’re saying makes perfect sense.

Are Women Psychically Superior to Men?

Sort of what I’ve been shown repeatedly and not something I’d ever considered consciously, but here’s where I blow your mind. Through the wonders of neuroscience, we now know that women essentially think with both the right and left sides of their brain linguistically, while men predominantly only use their left. Wow, and in my estimation, our society is also quite left brain materialist dominated now, isn’t it? We sure love to pay our artists. That couldn’t be part the problem, could it? No way.

You see, that’s the thing with the Occult. It’s crazy for sure, in that self inflicted schizo sort of way, but when the intel checks out and it’s happening because you’re replicating experiments you’ve read about in books, then it gets a bit harder to run from and believe me I’ve tried. So I guess what I’m saying is that if I were to say, study psychic phenomenon, I’d probably take the fact that women might be way better at it inherently into consideration right from the jump. Worth testing. In fact, in the one remote viewing experiment I’ve conducted in my life, the guys did eerily well but the girl cut to the very fiber of my essence and made me cry. In a culture that suffers from a fundamental lack of empathy, I can’t think of a more important means of scientific exploration. Seems to be what a lot of Ayahuasca trips are telling dudes in no uncertain terms as well, I’m just getting it through different channels, and the further in you go the bigger it gets.

When you apply the as above, so below concept to the scenario, you’re then faced with the idea that this division of powers is reflected even in our genitalia, with women’s facing inward and men the inverse. Men are stimulated predominantly visually while women get off more through introspection. Guys might excel at lifting heavy things, playing guitar, and kicking ass, but maybe, just maybe, there’s more to life than that (I’m pretty sure there’s also tits). Only in a society that values materialism can the paternal dominate—can men be viewed as superior and treated as elites. We live in bizarro world, but things are gonna start shifting back around fellas, I’m just trying to tell you which way the wind is blowing.

On that note, on the night before I read through Pam Grossman’s interview responses to my questions, I was about to play video games but instead decided quite intuitively to finally take down the final 20% of the Abraxas Occult Journal that she’s now editing. Quite astonishingly, I’d left off right in the middle of an article about Peter Redgrave, where these concepts were discussed at length and stumbled across this fun tidbit:

“Ultimately, men are just jealous since “women are by nature the strongest dreamers”. A basic premise of sex magic is that the creative act, if denied a product on one plane (i.e. a baby), will have to produce something on another. Women, by their nature and through their capacity for dreaming, are superior to men in this form of creativity. Men know this at some level and, knowing where the real power lies, try to steal it.”

See, I didn’t come up with this idea. Hilariously, the next day when I read Pam’s responses, it turned out she wasn’t sold on this avenue of thought at all (you should really read that interview because it’s pretty great). The psychic supremacy of women is not something I ever see discussed, anywhere really, but there certainly is a history of hunting witches. I’ll also say that people like Terrence McKenna and Whitley Strieber (and me, and others) talk a lot about encounters with insectile feminine gods (suck it reptiles). Terrence and Dennis referenced a praying mantis totem specifically, Whitley a spider. Y’all know how their sexuality works right? Are we destined to be devoured? I’m fairly certain we could live off the waste created by our current consumerist era forever and ever if we put our minds to it. See, this is the sort of feminism we need. Screw all that, we can be just as obnoxious, violent, and emotionally crippled as men crap that Hollywood sells you. You can’t be “just as good as men”, you can be better. Keep exploring the “women are psychically superior to dudes in most cases as some Occult weirdo I read on the internet was shown” angle? Does it check out? Who knows, that’d be up to people way more left brained than me to decipher in any sort of macro way. I’m not great at all that hyper-rational science stuff. I’m far too busy worshiping pussy.

, , , , , , , ,

  • “Big” Richard Johnson

    didnt read lol

  • http://www.facebook.com/jboodhowerter J Bood Howerter

    You lose me, (and likely most of the rest of your free-thinking, intelligent audience but who am I to speak for them) when you elevate women above men. When “feminism” attempts this sleight-of-hand it becomes sexism. Especially when men attempt the same age-old trick. Equality in gender people, Equally unique and potentially opposite genders create balance. Anything out of balance WILL self-destruct. Any gender-based wide-sweeping blanket generalizations such as these are generally, false.

    • Borgar

      The authors contention that women are psychically superior, is not equivalent to simply “elevating them above men” on all accounts, but calling attention to a gender difference. Conversely, the fact that men are physically stronger than women, obviously makes them physically superior.

      Beside the neurological argument given in the article, women are psychically superior also because they are generally more enticing and passive in their sexuality, whereby they more readily attract and open themselves up to the receiving of divine blessing. This congenital superiority has made them subject to massive jealousy in the history of religion.

      “And the companion of the saviour was Mary Magdalene. Christ loved Mary more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her softly on her hand. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said to him ‘Why do you love her more than all of us?’ The Saviour answered and said to them, ‘Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness, they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and he who is blind will remain in darkness.’”

  • davakins

    I live on the fringe in a medium sized city in the south. It seems that woo woo is where much of the feminism has headed.

    • Guest

      Austin doesn’t count.

      • davakins

        not Austin,

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=523391417 Joel Dionne

    K, what was the original idea of Human Rights? Since we’re getting to the bottom of origins.

  • Hadrian999
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Debbie-Jaynes/1591664764 Debbie Jaynes

    *MALE NURSE* under the Muh Vagina spell.

  • http://strictlyapathy.comoj.com/ SoulArbiter

    Ok.

  • jnana

    From the Exegesis on the Soul which can be found @ http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/exe.html

    “Wise men of old gave the soul a feminine name. Indeed she is female in her nature as well. She even has her womb.

    As long as she was alone with the father, she was virgin and in form androgynous. But when she fell down into a body and came to this life, then she fell into the hands of many robbers. And the wanton creatures passed her from one to another and [...] her. Some made use of her by force, while others did so by seducing her with a gift. In short, they defiled her, and she [...] her virginity.

    And in her body she prostituted herself and gave herself to one and all, considering each one she was about to embrace to be her husband. When she had given herself to wanton, unfaithful adulterers, so that they might make use of her, then she sighed deeply and repented. But even when she turns her face from those adulterers, she runs to others and they compel her to live with them and render service to them upon their bed, as if they were her masters. Out of shame she no longer dares to leave them, whereas they deceive her for a long time, pretending to be faithful, true husbands, as if they greatly respected her. And after all this they abandon her and go.

    She then becomes a poor desolate widow, without help; not even a measure of food was left her from the time of her affliction. For from them she gained nothing except the defilements they gave her while they had sexual intercourse with her. And her offspring by the adulterers are dumb, blind and sickly. They are feebleminded.

    But when the father who is above visits her and looks down upon her and sees her sighing – with her sufferings and disgrace – and repenting of the prostitution in which she engaged, and when she begins to call upon his name so that he might help her, [...] all her heart, saying “Save me, my father, for behold I will render an account to thee, for I abandoned my house and fled from my maiden`s quarters. Restore me to thyself again.” When he sees her in such a state, then he will count her worthy of his mercy upon her, for many are the afflictions that have come upon her because she abandoned her house.”

    I have tried to get in touch w/ my Anima, because she kept manifesting in my life as a “Wild Anima”, meaning the women I was developing relationships with were creating many conflicts in my life. So one day I decided to write out and explore all the relations I have had with women from birth. This was quite illuminating and only afterwards did I discover others have done this to dissolve conflicts w/ their inner Anima/Animus. I have also dreamed I had a vagina(or maybe I had both sex organs) and in the dream I played with it, and so now if the dream was accurate I know what it’s like. Another time I had participated in helping to birth goats, and afterwards felt a little jealous of women, but then that vanished when I was playing w/ a goat n her kid, and feeling happy for her, allowing her happiness to be my happiness.

  • echar

    To me it’s odd to find “all the little hotties” in the middle of some defensive rhetoric over the image of feminism. I feel it may be a detriment to all to lay the blame on anything other than the polarized and extreme tendencies of some but not all who adhere to the feminist reality tunnels.

    If we are to perceive through the common stereotypical filters, then yes females are known to be more intuitive. Using the same perceptive filters it can be said that females are limited at math, science, mechanical aptitude, and a whole slough of other absolutes.

    • Guest

      I once read some psych study that suggested that I suck at math because my dad was a douche-bag. I’m sticking to that story until I teach myself calculus. Then I’ll laugh in his face…and he’ll still take the credit.

      • echar

        That’s the spirit! He can take the credit all he likes, you’ll still know calculus.

  • bobbiethejean

    Interesting read.

    I pointedly do not believe in psychic phenomena yet there are five people in this world (two females and three males) who are devoutly convinced that I am a “very powerful untrained psychic.” Quite frankly, I think this is silly. I simply have a great deal of empathy, I am good at reading people, I am good at predicting outcomes, and I excel at extrapolating. I don’t think there’s anything magical to it at all. It’s purely natural; it’s psychology, it’s biology- that’s it. But nope…. these five people, utterly convinced, hardcore. Even after I explained to them how I actually determined the “psychic knowledge” through natural means, they still prefer to believe I’m psychic rather than admit to the possibility that there might be a perfectly natural explanation.

    • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

      possibly your psychic abilities are a real part of you but not a part of your self image at this point.

      • bobbiethejean

        I just can’t see that as being the case. Why believe in the magical explanation when there is a logical explanation that makes sense?

        • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

          You are making a false dichotomy. If consciousness is non-local its not magic.

          • bobbiethejean

            When I say “magic” or “supernatural” I mean “breaking or not fitting in with the laws of physics as we know them. In my understanding of it, a lot of what is classified as psychic phenomena does not fit in with our understanding of how the universe works. In my mind, a psychological/biological explanation for “psychic phenomena” is a lot more believable than something like mind-brain duality for which there is no real compelling, objective evidence.

          • Borgar

            But non-locality isn’t breaking with any “laws” of physics. It’s an empirically testable fact. According to modern physics all matter and energy is non-local, every phenomenon is instantaneously connected with everything else on a level so deep it’s “bypassing” causality and the speed of light. That’s pretty magical. Magic and the supernatural is not at odds with modern science. It’s a complementary model on a larger scale the same way classical and quantum physics are complementary on a smaller one. Like the revolutionary shift in physics from a continuous universe to the quantum, it’s about applying a whole new set of assumptions, yielding a whole new set of experiences.

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            Whatever you think the “Opposite” of what you believe is, its not what I think. Consciousness interacts with the world on a a quantum level and displays non-locaity. Notice I didn’t mention anything about fairies or pixie dust.

          • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

            The problem with telepathy and things like that, the reason why its random and unreliable, its because of lack of five sense reference points. But as far as people sharing thoughts telepathically, its possible, if consciousness extends to the quantum scale. Because on a quantum level thought can travel faster than the speed of light and transcend space and time.

            So because of this, you get things like Mothers knowing the second their son dies, thousands of miles away and things like telephone telepathy

          • Guest

            You are where I was 3 years ago. I spent at least a decade as a hard-core rationalist, atheist, materialist, etc., etc.

            Now…I’m still a skeptic, but more honestly would have to say agnostic…but even that is too muddled a term for most people…

            I
            just think “God” is a pretty good metaphor for everything humans do not
            really understand; I also think that it is a religious belief to claim
            that humans can or someday will completely understand; there’s not a
            shred of evidence that we will ever figure out “everything”…42…

  • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

    Women are better than men. I mean that is just the way it is. I just think men should be honored for putting women above themselves, chivalry and all that shit, instead of being treated like Homer Simpson.

    This sentiment of “yeah, women suck, let’s all wear leather and carry guns and bugger each other” is lost on me. http://www.amazon.com/The-Way-of-Men-ebook/dp/B007O0Y1ZE

    I mean that is fine if that is what you are into, but Its not a counterpoint to feminism in my opinion.

    Women embody a divine mystery. They are more in tune with the tao. It comes more naturally to them and because of that more women are enlightened. Its right there in the Tao te Ching.

    But there is balance of yin and yang, men embody more of a Shiva energy and women more of s Shakti energy, but women are connected to infinity, inherently by being women. So that is why they need to be protected by men. They are more valuable.

    I like Girl writes what, because if what she brings to light about male disposability, but that is not to say I think male disposability should be done away with in favor of unisexual blandness.

    • mannyfurious

      That was a hell of a comment. “Unisexual blandness” is the perfect term for what a lot of these people are arguing for, whether they realize it or not. Both sexes should be celebrated for their differences. Neither should subjugated, that’s for sure. I agree that women are more in tune with the “tao.” Most early civilizations/religions were matriarchal for a reason. And in the “eastern” mystical tradition, men are encouraged to cultivate the “feminine” side of themselves.

      I’m not sure if women need to be “protected,” per se, but they should be respected and celebrated. One of the most disgusting aspects of our culture is that we go out of our way to marginalize and subjugate women. I’ve got a 300-lbs cousin on facebook who’s always posting his stupid thoughts about women (e.g. posting a picture of three smiling horses and typing “Bitches be like… me and my girls look good, though”)even though he’s a fucking moron. The worst part is he’s pretty popular with the females, which only bothers me on principle, since I’m happily married, but it still drives me nuts.

      • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

        Yeah, women fall for assholes a lot. Its even in the Kama Sutra. “Immoral men never have trouble seducing women” or something like that.

    • kowalityjesus

      This article and your posts remind me of a sculpture in downtown Royal Oak that was the swan song of prolific Detroit sculptor Marshall Frederics. The woman is rising above the man, and would not be there were it not for the man. http://www.civicartsproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Royal_Oak_Michigan_CAPAJR0005.jpg

      Maybe one day I will be lucky enough to elevate a woman ‘ad celestis’

      • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

        That’s pretty cool. I have always been partial to this image:

        http://katrichterwrites.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/pre-raph.jpg

      • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

        enlighten me on “ad celestis” google fails me.

        • kowalityjesus

          to the stars/heavens. Great image, its Romantic art before art blew its top. I know some philosophies would call this the peak of art, before it evolved away from realism and romanticism into Toulouse-Lautrec and Van Gogh.

          The apt and concrete metaphor to this phenomenon is Newtonian physics reaching its pinnacle at about the same era. However, quantum theory trumped it and confined Newtonian physics to the prosaic, not the avant-garde.

          http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Lautrec_at_the_moulin_rouge_1892.jpg

  • http://twitter.com/TedHeistman Ted Heistman

    I am in favor of what some call “complementarity” of the sexes. Men and women are different. Every cell in their bodies are different. They smell different, look different, feel different, talk different, walk different.

    This difference starts on a micro scale on a cellular level and continues through the scales even to a cosmic level. This polarity is very important in tantra and sex magic. Feminism has some wrong headed ideas, but most things presented as counterpoints to it are kind of weak IMO, like the PUA community on one hand to Macho woman haters on the other.

    Women have an effect on men that is actually an improvement. I also think that there have always been powerful women who were at the same time very feminine. That’s why the whole victim mentality of feminism is bullshit.

    I once asked a self professed feminist roommate of mine “If men and women are equal, why (throughout all of history and up until the present day, apparently) are women so easily opressed?” It was presented as kind of a Koan. I wasn’t really implying women weren’t equal, but rather a chance to look at an alternative to the victim mentality. Anyway, what happened was is that she threatened to kick me out of her house(which her boyfriend owned and which she did all the cooking and cleaning for him in)

    • Guest

      Are you suggesting that she was a hypocrite because she cooked and cleaned?

      I’ve often wondered if women (as a whole–not counting exceptional women who would have been scientists and philosophers and whatnot, whether or not the rest of woman-kind came with them) would have made much of a fuss beyond getting the vote had men not 1.) looked down on house work as somehow unequal to other types of work (not all men are doctors, lawyers or even construction workers, yo…even then, lots of men had totally piddly jobs that any Victorian woman could have done competently on the first day), and had some men not 2.) invented all sorts of “time-saving” devices in the 50′s that left most women to pretty much spend most of their day as ornaments…

      In the first case, men knocking house work was basically a giant “I dare you” to half of the human race…and you can thank McDonald’s for being there to take care of us when everyone forgot how to cook…

      In the second case, really…what did dudes think would happen when all of those women were suddenly bored out of their minds? Add that to the fact that some of those women were coming out of WWII, realizing “hey, I like, built an airplane or some shit a few years ago…I think I can do other things besides knit with all of this new free time…”

      I’m not sure I even know what this “victim feminism” is or if it really exists outside of the internet. I don’t have any feminist friends who are victims. Some survivors, sure, but no victims…

      P.S. I love to cook. I hate to clean. Glad my boyfriend cleans. I’ll totally make him a lasagna if he does the laundry. Fair?

  • landydavis

    as I have correctly stated in the past..all status tracking is a precursor to ego rationalizing oppression. ALL. see if you can understand this “there is no difference”

  • Anthony Kwit

    I added you on Facebook, Thad. I agree with your article 100%.