How To Shield Your Subculture Through Obfuscation

Are there still ways to keep secrets online? Final Boss Form writes:

A subcultural style [cannot] be “owned”. The only way to ensure that your aesthetic is not going to become used by others is to never share it with anyone. Another approach is to protect your aesthetic with physical violence (see: gang colors). Otherwise, once you allow your presence to be seen, it can be consumed.

Most communities protect their culture through some form of obfuscation. Some of this practice is incredible.

• Tum bl r an d LJ u sers sep ar ate w ords the ough o dd spacin g in o rde r to fo ol sea rc heng i nes.
• Chinese users hide political messages in image attachments to seemingly benign posts on  Weibo.
• General Petraeus communicated solely through draft mode.
• 4chan scares away the faint of heart with porn.
• More technically astute groups communicate through obscure messaging systems.

, , , , ,

  • Anarchy Pony

    John has a long mustache. John has a long mustache.

    • Ittabena

      - The World At War, right?

      or was it The Longest Day?

      • Anarchy Pony

        The original Red Dawn of course. But it’s been used in quite a few places.

        • Ittabena

          Okay, now I have to look. I am sure it was in one of the ones I mentioned, and they are both older. The search for the original begins.

          It’s like the Badges? We don’t need no stinking badges. Actually in three different movies, but the original was the Huston/Bogart film Treasure of the Sierra Madres.

          • Anarchy Pony

            That’s just where I know it from, I seriously doubt it was the first place it was used.

  • Chaos_Dynamics

    Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra.

    • Calypso_1

      Gilgamesh and Enkidu at Uruk

      • http://www.ContraControl.com/ Zenc

        Slaying the Bull of Heaven.

    • Anarchy Pony

      His arms open wide.

  • Andrew

    This brings up a lot of questions for me re form vs. content. While the two are inextricably linked, and “actions speak louder than words,” and “the media is the message,” is an aesthetic (fashion) really worth obfuscating (lying) over? Doesn’t the very act of hiding alter style? Seems to me that worrying about being imitated prevents authenticity, and sacrifices substance for appearance (or disappearance). Isn’t a disingenuous subculture just as bad as the disingenuous mainstream culture? Shouldn’t our efforts be towards being honest rather than being different?

    • Calypso_1

      This was dealt with extensively by Frazer in ‘The Golden Bough’ where he catalogs the magical/linguistic apparatus of renaming objects, particularly objects of power to 1) maintain their power, 2) maintain the integrity of a group from co-opting. Be it in the formation of new tribal identities or in maintenance of the status quo.

  • Chaos_Dynamics

    AMESLAN works quite well irl scenarios particularly when coupled with unique regional or localized/personalized nuances such as modded vocabulary and slang.

  • BrianApocalypse

    This technique is employed by ‘witchouse’ bands with names like ‘~▲†▲~’. An attempt to deliberately engineer obscurity to remain cool and uncontaminated.

    • echar

      It’s annoying as hell to organize in a music library though. I like to have the album covers and all the correct info.

      • obsidianobelisk

        Artists should make things easier for our creature comforts.

        • echar

          Are you being facetious?

          • obsidianobelisk

            You decide.

          • echar

            Ok I agree. It’s good marketing to make everything easier to be enjoyed.

  • echar

    Iway ecreeday atthay omfray isthay omentmay onway, allway isinfonaughtsday areway otay useway igpay atinlay.

    01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110000 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100001

    • Chaos_Dynamics

      43 6f 6d 65 20 63 69 72 63 61 20 69 74 61 6c 69 61 6e 6f 20 70 69 67 6c 61 74 69 6e

      • echar

        I think that’s base-64, but not uber enough to decode.