The U.S. Media’s Silence On The Landmark Guatemalan Genocide Trial

genocideThe Center for Economic and Policy Research wrote last month:

Ten days ago Guatemalan courts convicted former dictator General Efraín Ríos Montt, to 80 years in prison for charges of genocide and crimes against humanity. Though the ruling has just been overturned on technical grounds (the trial is expected to backtrack to where it stood on April 19, before again resuming), it was the first time that a country has been able to use its own criminal courts to try a former head of state for genocide, arguably making it one of the most important court decisions in decades.

Despite the significance of the ruling, not just for what it represents for the more than 200,000 victims of the genocide and their families, but also for human rights worldwide, the mass media in the U.S. has mostly ignored the U.S. role in contributing to and supporting the genocide.

The New York Times provided a couple of exceptions in the last week. Its “Room for Debate,” feature published a range of opinions on the extent of U.S. support and complicity for the Ríos Montt regime. And last week the New York Times published an exceptional print article about the role of the U.S. government in Guatemala, Reagan’s financial and fervent military support for Ríos Montt’s bloody dictatorship, and how this aspect of the genocide had been conspicuously absent during the trial against Ríos Montt.

Amazingly, the Washington Post chose not to report at all on the historic ruling in their print edition following the day of the ruling. Two days after the conviction was announced (and after it made headlines around the world), and buried deep in the digest section of Sunday’s print international section were a total of 73 words dedicated to what it said human rights activists called “a historic moment” in Guatemala.

This dearth of words from the Washington Post shouldn’t be too surprising. After all, not reporting or investigating news about massacres and genocide in Guatemala when it had the opportunity to do so is consistent with the Post’s reporting on the country throughout the 1980s when the U.S. government supported death squads in the countryside killing anyone and everyone that they could. The New York Times, it should be pointed out, also mostly ignored the genocide when it was taking place. This was the pre-internet era, so if these newspapers did not report on massacres, for the United States public and policy-makers, they weren’t part of the news. (However, investigative reporter Allan Nairn did get opinion pieces into the NYT and Washington Post some time after the worst massacres had occurred.)

Thirty years later human rights defenders, victims of the genocide, dedicated investigative reporters, activists, lawyers, historians, and more, have done that work, showing the world what it takes to win back some justice, and putting themselves on the right side of history. But the Washington Post, in its silence, continues to commit the same mistakes that enabled U.S. military and financial support for genocide in Guatemala or, to draw a more recent parallel, the invasion of Iraq and the deaths of perhaps more than a million people.

, , , , , , ,

  • echar

    I can think of at least one story that has assumed control for the time being. Several more that have happened in the near past have slid under the door. *shrug*

    I read the Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber were spotted flirting, oh and the Biebs is driving a leopard print Audi.

    • Juan

      Right, and wasn’t there a missing white woman that we should all be concerned about as well? Or have those fallen from favor in the propaganda cycle?

    • InfvoCuernos

      I just threw up a little.

  • Aungsan

    It never ceases to amaze me how bad media is in the US, land of the naive, home of the misinformed.

  • Juan

    Of course this will not be covered in the US media. Frst of all, it would obviously raise all kinds of uncomfortable questions about the US’s involvement in ths horror. Also, this is not a story that will have much appeal to the general mouth-breathing public. They don’t know, they don’t wanna know, and they don’t care.

    • echar

      Guatemala, isn’t that where bananas, coffee, and cacao come from? More importantly are these resources safe? It’s bad enough that I constantly lose my Hummer in Walmart parking lot, but I just can’t go without these important resources. I mean I could, but I know this cute little cafe that serves the best Guatemalan Hot cacao, coffee, and icy banana drinks. I would hate for Martin and Lisa to no longer be able to serve me.

  • BuzzCoastin

    while sitting in a Munich hotel room
    just before the start of the Iraq war in 2003
    I watched Iraq unconditionally surrender to the US on CNN
    24 hours before the invasion began

    surprisingly, no one in the US saw that
    and not surprisingly
    I could never find a video clip of that event

  • denverover

    Shows the backward 3rd world country of Guatemala is years more advanced in justice than the USA where war criminals and mass murderers are protected. I guess that makes the USA a 4th world country.
    And now the liars say there have been chemical weapons used by Assad in Syria so they can “aid the enemy”(Al-Queda) with weapons, just like the are prosecuting Bradley Manning for.

    • Jin The Ninja

      although i agree with your sentiment- calling guatemala ‘backward’ harkens back to justifications behind colonialism and neo-colonialism which is rather circular if you are critiquing the american justice system.

      • denverover

        I was deliberately being facetious in order to emphasize the disgrace of the USA for it’s dishonesty in the pursuit of “justice”, I didn’t mean to disparage the country of Guatemala.

  • http://slrman.wordpress.com/ James Smith

    WE can’t know about this. George W. Bush is still alive and free. He belongs in a Turkish prison. Rendition was his idea wasn’t it?