Debunking the “Great Global Warming Swindle”

Peter Sinclair:

When the Great Global Warming Swindle was first broadcast – climate deniers thought that at last they had the definitive polemic to beat back the forces of science and reason…..

NASA on the recent deep solar minimum
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum/

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/03sep_sunspots/

NASA solar cycle video 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sASbVkK-p0w

, , ,

  • marshall

    the only thing that genuinely debunks the “theory” of anthropogenic climate change is science. proponents of anthropogenic climate change do not use actual science or methods of science to study the global effect, only correlating data, which is really the only card they hold at the table.

    • Lookinfor Buford

      Multicolinearity FAIL!

      • marshall

        you forgot an L, but funny nonetheless.

    • bobbiethejean

      To assert that humans are having no or little effect on the climate, at this point, is patently absurd.

      • marshall

        your point of absurdity is valid, but one cannot claim that the concept of anthropogenic climate change is science, it is not. you have to remember that the concept is implicating global change; and as correlating data shows, it affects region to region i.e. soil and water contamination, there is no science to back up global, catastrophic climate change. however, there is evidence that we are in a peak interglacial period similar to about 100,000 years ago, when the overall earth’s temperature was far warmer than it is today. the pattern in natural temperature fluctuation going back roughly 1,000,000 years shows this.

  • marshall

    the only thing that genuinely debunks the “theory” of anthropogenic climate change is science. proponents of anthropogenic climate change do not use actual science or methods of science to study the global effect, only correlating data, which is really the only card they hold at the table.

  • alizardx

    If Koch and Exxon/Mobil were to put the kind of money into FLAT EARTH!!! that they put into global warming denialism, would “the world is round” no longer be “settled science”?

    • Charlie Primero

      Humorously, …they did. The fraudulent IPCC computer models assume the earth is not a sphere and sunshine is cold. If you don’t believe me, go look at them. Exxon/Mobil is laughing all the way to the bank.

  • alizardx

    If Koch and Exxon/Mobil were to put the kind of money into FLAT EARTH!!! that they put into global warming denialism, would “the world is round” no longer be “settled science”?

  • Karl W. Braun

    The notion of “global warming”/ “climate change”, or whatever it’s called these days, is a fad that’s pretty much run its course. Time now to move on, I say.

    • Charlie Primero

      I agree. The fraudulent nature of this climate tax is becoming so transparent it’s tedious.

      It’s just so twisted and depraved I can’t look away; trick the sheep into demanding government tax their breath and give that money to giant energy corporations.

      • Lookinfor Buford

        For some of us, it was obvious from the beginning.

      • Andrew

        Nobody has ever proposed taxing breath.

        • marshall

          but, there’s a lot of potential revenue in it.

  • Charlie Primero

    C’mon GG. 2009 ?

    Your weekly Climate Fraud promotions are becoming Monty Python silly.

    • Andrew

      Criticizing the date? That’s all you got. Weak.

21
More in Climate Change, Debunking, Global Warming
Cenk Uygur on Climate Change: Remember Who Lied to You

Cenk Uygur and “The Young Turks” panelists Cara Santa Maria, Ana Kasparian and Jayar Jackson talk about the latest extreme weather and why public support for addressing climate change isn’t...

Close