Lost Between the Cushions: CouchSurfing’s Identity Crisis

worklife_small-talk-is-big_june_jugglezine_maassen1

The culture of sharing your house and goodwill in hopes of getting a social return may be at risk due to growth and rude people.

Via The Connectivist:

Is trusting a stranger’s Internet profile still a safe and meaningful way to travel?

Florian, a 44-year old German man, felt used and taken advantage of by the stranger in his house. For a week, the stranger came and went as if he owned the place, returning late at night and making no time at all for the distraught Florian. Hardly any dialogue or intimacy was shared between the two. Florian, deeply distressed, complained that he and the stranger had “almost no opportunity to eat together or really get to know each other.”

Such are not the ways of CouchSurfing.

The Internet has a history of providing safe havens for new social, economical, and scientific experiments, like Bitcoin or downloadable vaccines. But what happens when they get too big for their boots?

Since its launch in 2004, the CouchSurfing community has prided itself on envisioning “a world made better by travel and travel made richer by connection.” CouchSurfing emerged as one of the first manifestations of the now-ubiquitous sharing economy. Some argue that it helped usher in companies such as Airbnb, Zipcar and TaskRabbit. CouchSurfing was also an early harbinger ofpop-up culture. Both rely on social networking and social media technologies, and both bring diverse groups of people who wouldn’t normally meet into a brief but potentially meaningful encounter, says Jennie Germann Molz, a sociologist at the College of the Holy Cross, in Massachusetts.

“Couchsurfers share an intense experience and connection together, and then they disperse and go on their way,” she says. “It’s a new kind of sociality.”

CouchSurfing may have played a role in kick starting a wave of sub-economies, but there is one crucial difference: money isn’t the currency by which it operates. That isn’t to say that CouchSurfing is free. From the outside, CouchSurfing may appear to be a platform for freeloading around the globe, but in reality surfers crash with hosts with the implicit understanding that both parties will gain some sort of social value from the exchange. This could take the form of sharing insights on other cultures; cooking, drinking or practicing language skills together; or simply forging a somewhat deep, if fleeting, connection with another human being. Some, too, use CouchSurfing to further a lifestyle of freeganism, where generosity and kindness stand in for money. As couchsurfers are fond of saying: “It’s not just about the furniture.”

At least, that’s how things went in the good old days. In 2011, CouchSurfing became a for-profit company, and swiftly closed a $15 million round of funding in 2012. The spirit of CouchSurfing, some members felt, was broken. Germann Molz, who has been conducting interviews with couchsurfers since around 2004, closely monitored this recent shift in the community. “I see the network going through an identity crisis now—though maybe ‘crisis’ is too strong of a word,” she says. The CouchSurfing community has now begun to debate whether “the site has gotten too big for it’s own good,” says Germann Molz.

CouchSurfing, as a result, is becoming nothing more than a means for cheap travel among its newbie members, which leads to misunderstandings and hosting conflicts such as the one experienced by Florian.

The company’s moral economy, Germann Molz continues, is also undergoing an overhaul in the wake the website’s for-profit status. The site traditionally used several modes for promoting trust among members. First, like eBay, Airbnb and so many other e-commerce platforms, it features a review system in which members can vouch for one another by leaving feedback and ratings. Additionally, CouchSurfing offers to verify the addresses of members who provided a credit card. But in a way, these systems were just formalities. In the early years, couchsurfers simply assumed that anyone who found their way to the site was likely trustworthy by virtue of the spirit of travel, open-mindedness and hospitality. “Using a combination of those mechanisms, people got to the point where they would open their door,” Germann Molz says. “People just decided to trust people.”

CONTINUE READING

via The Connectivist

 

, , , , ,

  • Tchoutoye

    “Hardly any dialogue or intimacy was shared between the two.”

    Is it just me or does the wording really suggest that Herr Florian offered a place to crash in the (faint) hope of scoring some nookie. (Not saying he actually did)

    • echar

      Possibly, but it seems to be explained in the article that early on that people offered up their home to hang out with strangers. Not for the sexual possibilities, but that it has become so. Inevitably, some would say.

      I am amazed no one has been seriously harmed, raped, or killed through using these types of services. Much like Craigs list, or those home renting sights. I read a horror story about some tweakers renting a home for a week. The owners return to a messed up home and discarded meth pipes. They used a stolen credit card.

      • Juan

        Tweakers, scourge of the universe.
        I know lots of people all over the world who have had really good luck with Air BnB. It’s not free, but it is still the same concept of either renting out your place to strangers or renting a place yourself.
        I would totally do it, but not as a host. Seems a hassle to host.

        • echar

          I bet what I described, if it was real, was a freak one off. I was told you can stay at monasteries around the world for a real good price. That is if you don’t mind supporting the catholic church. In a sense you are supporting the monks or nuns living there. I am pretty sure many of them are decent people, in fact I have read about rebel nuns.

          • Juan

            Yeah, as much as bitch about this and that, I find that most people, individually, are pretty decent. Sure there are psychos, but they are in the minority.
            I seem to remember hearing something on my local Pacifica station saying that the Vatican had excommunicated a bunch of nuns for being too radical or something along those lines.
            Catolic monestaries are out of the question for me. Though I’m sure I’d be fine, but I am just really put off by the whole Catholic thing and prefer to give it a miss whenever possible.

          • echar

            I am right there with you, thought i’d still bring it up though. I forgot to mention the reason they are offering them as places to stay is because they are running low on funds and may lose the sites. If only I were a billionair.

  • InfvoCuernos

    I currently have a felon satanic nazi tweeker crashing at my house, which can be a little stressful, but the blowjobs are top notch.

    • echar

      That literally caused me to snort. Audibly, not cocaine or meth.

21