So let me get this straight, we fast track renditions but hunt down whistleblowers on presidential planes!

via chycho

whistleblower-law1-alberta

The CIA was granted permission to use rendition (to the USA of indicted terrorists) in a presidential directive signed by US President Bill Clinton in 1995, following a procedure established by US President George H. W. Bush in January 1993”. This program kicked into high-gear under Bush junior after 911 and continues to this day under the Obama administration.

According to a US Congress report [2008], up to 14,000 people may have been victims of rendition and secret detention since 2001. Some reports estimate there have been twice as many. The US admits to have captured more than 80,000 prisoners in its ‘war on terror’.”

The map below shows the countries involved in fast tracking rendition flights, helping to transport U.S. captives to secret prisons – black sites – across the globe, condemning innocent men, women, and children to confinement, torture, and death. To the best of my knowledge, not a single rendition flight was ever grounded or searched.


click to enlarge – source

And yet, European countries – specifically France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy – had the audacity to deny passage of Evo Morales’ Bolivian presidential plane “over suspicions that whistleblower Edward Snowden was potentially aboard.” To put this into perspective, this would be equivalent to denying passage to Air Force One while it was transporting Obama because another country thought that one of their citizens might be on board. Absurd, and yet, western mainstream media is treating this as if it was just a simple mistake, an “embarrassment” of sorts.

Bolivians Indignant at European Treatment of President Morales

As Malcolm X warned us in his Audubon Ballroom speech in Harlem in 13 December 1964:

“The press is so powerful in its image-making role, it can make a criminal look like he’s the victim and make the victim look like he’s the criminal. This is the press, an irresponsible press…. If you aren’t careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”


click to enlarge – source

To help put the above events into the appropriate light, specifically on how they relate to how wikileaks and Julian Assange, and whistleblowers like Jesselyn Radack, Thomas Andrews Drake, William Binney, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden are being treated and portrayed by the U.S. government and the majority of western mainstream media, below you will find a special Democracy Now segment from a 2007 event on “How the Pentagon Papers Came to be Published By the Beacon Press” as told by Daniel Ellsberg, Mike Gravel, and Robert West. The panel highlights the depths to which criminals will go to to hide their crimes and stifle dissent (emphasis added).

“Forty-one years ago, Beacon Press lost a Supreme Court case brought against it by the U.S. government for publishing the first full edition of the Pentagon Papers. It is now well known how The New York Times first published excerpts of the top-secret documents in June 1971, but less well known is how the Beacon Press, a small nonprofit publisher affiliated with the Unitarian Universalist Association, came to publish the complete 7,000 pages that exposed the true history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Their publication led the Beacon press into a spiral of two-and-a-half years of harassment, intimidation, near bankruptcy and the possibility of criminal prosecution. This is a story that has rarely been told in its entirety….

“The relevance of our experience, those 35 years ago, to secrecy and deception in government today is patently obvious. For example, three of the issues and principles that were involved in our court actions were misuse of power of the Justice Department, invasion of privacy, and misuse of secrecy by the government. All of those clearly apply to what is happening today.

“In his 1972 dissenting opinion in the Gravel case, Supreme Court Justice Douglas said, ‘The story of the Pentagon Papers is a chronicle of the suppression of vital decisions to protect the reputations and political hides of men who work an amazingly successful scheme of deception on the American people.’ And he went on to say in that decision that he had no choice but to hold that it was the government that is lawless, not the press.

“In 1971, Senator Gravel wrote, ‘The Pentagon Papers show that we have created a new culture, protected from the influence of American life by the shield of secrecy.’

How the Pentagon Papers Came to be Published By the Beacon Press Told by Daniel Ellsberg & Others

, , , , , , , , ,

  • Juan

    Man, all this stuff is really confusing. It would be very easy to just say “fuck it, it’s all nothing but some made up show.” Actually, that’s pretty much how I’m dealing with it.
    Is there any consensus on whether Snowden, et al are limited hangout operations?
    One theory I’ve heard, is that Snowden’s revelations were basically the national security state unvaleing the panopticon to the general public. They were saying “We are watching everything you say and do and there is nothing you can do anout it.Now go and police yourselves, bitches.”

    • Bluebird_of_Fastidiousness

      Detachment is probably the psychologically healthiest option. If you ask much of the internet, Christ has returned. You wouldn’t ask an Obot, because you know what they’d say.

      As far as I can tell, Cheney is pissed. That’s enough for me to put this in the ‘good’ column. But who really knows?

      • Juan

        Who indeed? Prolly no one has the “whole story.”
        The other theory I’ve heard is that this recent, little kerfuffle is really about a rivalry between the old guard spooks at the CIA and the spook nerds at NSA. That it was the CIA essentially fucking with the NSA. Again, who the hell really knows?

      • AManCalledDa-da

        Awesome. “The Cheney Meter” is born. If Cheney’s pissed, continue in that direction.

    • gustave courbet

      That explanation doesn’t hold much weight to me in that the establishment always prefers to operate under the radar. Additionally, these revelations make it harder for the NSA to maintain cozy relationships with the ‘big data’ companies it is working with. The most compelling theory relating Snowden to a potential black operation that I’ve heard involves the possibility of inter-agency warfare between the CIA and the NSA, in which Snowden would publicly embarrass the NSA at the behest of the CIA. An interesting possibility, but impossible to verify in the shadowy world of secret government.

  • trashborg

    I hope this comment is being monitored by the US govt. “Go fuck yourselfs”

  • Nathaniel Harris

    One thing is for sure- anyone who blows the whistle on any group bigger than themselves; from the Bohemian Grove through to government, from the Military through to the Health Services, or from Scientology through to black magic cults, is forfeiting their own safety, and possibly that of their family. Whistleblowers are the heroes of the information age.

  • Juan

    That’s intersting, there was a response here to one of my post that is no longer visible.
    It contained this link.
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/06/18/309609/how-to-identify-cia-limited-hangout-op/
    Anywhoo, I read the thing. Its thesis is basically that the Snowden affair is a limited hang out op. The goal of said op, besides freaking out the public, is to get the US to invade Syria. So there ya go; make of it what you will.

21
More in Bolivia, Bradley Manning, Fascism, Julian Assange, morales, NSA, Rendition, Snowden, Whistleblowers
1984 All Over Again

In the wake of the NSA/Snowden revelations, and the general sense of paranoia that has taken grip of the news cycle and the internet, a few pundits have assumed the...

Close