Witches And The Creation Of Western Capitalism

witchesVia The End of Capitalism, Alex Knight offers a fascinating take on the powerful meaning of witches in European history:

For Silvia Federici, it’s no accident that “the witch-hunt occurred simultaneously with the colonization and extermination of the populations of the New World, the English enclosures, [or] the beginning of the slave trade”. She instructs that all of these seemingly unrelated tragedies were initiated by the same European ruling elite at the very moment that capitalism was in formation.”

During the late 15th through 17th centuries the fear of witches was ever-present in Europe and Colonial America. The author recounts, “for more than two centuries, in several European countries, hundreds of thousands of women were tried, tortured, burned alive or hanged, accused of having [given themselves] to the devil and, by magical means, murdered scores of children, made potions with their flesh, caused the death of their neighbors, and performed many other abominations.”

So where did this tidal wave of hysteria come from that took the lives so many poor women? Caliban underscores that the persecution of witches was not just some error of ignorant peasants, but in fact the deliberate policy of Church and State, the very ruling class of society.

A major component of these crusades was the use of so-called “shock and awe” tactics to astound the population with “spectacular displays of force,” which helped to soften up resistance to drastic or unpopular reforms. Federici describes a typical witch burning as, “an important public event, which all the members of the community had to attend, including the children of the witches, especially their daughters who, in some cases, would be whipped in front of the stake on which they could see their mother burning alive.”

The book argues that these gruesome executions not only punished “witches” but graphically demonstrated the repercussions for any kind of disobedience to the clergy or nobility. In particular, the witch burnings were meant to terrify women into accepting “a new patriarchal order where women’s bodies, their labor, their sexual and reproductive powers were placed under the control of the state and transformed into economic resources.”

Federici puts forward that up until the 16th century, though living in a sexist society, European women retained significant economic independence from men that they typically do not under capitalism, where gender roles are more distinguished. “If we also take into account that in medieval society collective relations prevailed over familial ones, and most of the tasks that female serfs performed (washing, spinning, harvesting, and tending to animals on the commons) were done in cooperation with other women, we then realize… [this] was a source of power and protection for women. It was the basis for an intense female sociality and solidarity that enabled women to stand up to men.”

Read the rest at The End of Capitalism

, , , , ,

  • Nathaniel Harris

    That makes sense. Also, when Church and State are one, it is only natural that a spiritual people would express their rebellion in spiritual terms. The ‘Free Spirits’, being early anarchists who wore red robes to harangue the priestcraft during church ceremonies, are one example. In Europe, the ‘Black Mass’ was not so uncommon an occurence; often taking place during the ‘Invisible Days’ when the normal structure of society was reversed- hence the ‘Pope of Fools’.

  • Guest

    “a new patriarchal order where women’s bodies, their labor, their sexual
    and reproductive powers were placed under the control of the state and
    transformed into economic resources.”

    I run into it all the time: girls who think they are “free” because they fuck for money or strip or do porn what-have-you. Yes, one CAN be free and do those things, but one is not free *because* of these things, (in my opinion), since trading sex or “faux sexuality” for money is nothing other than transforming sexuality into economic resources…I don’t know how it became so backwards, but it’s easy to blame Madonna/all-of-the-pop-stars-following…

    I’m not sure I fully understand what the whole 60′s “free love” thing was about, but wasn’t part of it that women were NOT fucking men just because they had material wealth? I.e., wasn’t part of “free love” also strictly monetarily-speaking?

    Therefore, the witchiest, most-anti-capitalist thing a straight girl can do is fuck a (reasonably good-lookin’*) hobo…and take him out to dinner, while you’re at it…

    *didn’t say you had to ignore biology, after all…there may be some details to work out about setting him up with a shower and change of clothes…

    • Kropotkin1936

      Hey! I’m a reasonably good looking hobo! Move to the northwest, where hobos get all the action!

  • M00nface

    “hundreds of thousands of women”

    No. That’s not right. This figure is always exaggerated. It is currently believed by historians to be between 40 000 and 100 000. [Wikipedia]

    In England only 228 witches were put to death in 300 years.

    Aside from the above quibble, it’s an interesting read.

  • Reasor

    It sounds as though Alex Knight has done an excellent job connecting the dots.