Federal Judge Rules NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Violates Rights

Photo: longislandwins (CC)

Photo: longislandwins (CC)

About time! From NBC New York:

A federal judge ruled that the contentious NYPD tactic known as stop-and-frisk violates constitutional rights, appointing a monitor to oversee reforms and ordering the department to test body cameras for officers.

U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin wrote in the opinion released Monday that she was not ordering an end to the practice, but was seeking to provide remedies “to ensure that the practice is carried out in a manner that protects the rights and liberties of all New Yorkers, while still providing much-needed police protection.”

She said the practice violates the Fourth Amendment, the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, and the 14th Amendment, which forbids the denial of life, liberty or property, without due process.

Mayor Bloomberg said the city would appeal, and accused the judge of ignoring “the real-world realities of crime.” He said the judge’s orders, if implemented, would make New York “a more dangerous place.”

“This is a very dangerous decision made by a judge that I think just does not understand how policing works,” he said…

[continues at NBC New York]

, , ,

  • InfvoCuernos

    I had pretty much given up on that one. They let that criminal search shit go on for so long I just figured that was another one of those rights we had lost. Let’s hope that shit stays down this time.

  • Guest

    The police were bragging that they have weapons that can take down an air plane and I was wondering if they were insinuating.

21