The Daily Mail’s Retracted Story On A U.S. False Flag Chemical Attack In Syria

syria

In January, the Daily Mail reported that leaked emails suggested that the United States was planning to stage a chemical weapons attack which would be blamed on the Assad regime and justify military action against Syria.

The article was subsequently deleted, with the Mail apologizing and explaining that the emails had turned out to be fabricated.

Is this a case of a hoax and shoddy tabloid reporting? Or a possible conspiracy? The original article can be viewed via the Internet Archive:

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

, , , , , ,

  • PPE Student

    Analyse the documents and decide for yourselves whether it is fraudulent or not,
    http://www.cyberwarnews.info/2013/01/24/britam-defence-hacked-confidential-documents-leaked-site-offline/

  • Hocketeer

    Meanwhile our favorite bush league bonesman is having a major league boner man.

  • _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

    the more i look into this and the original investigation by redditors, the more i believe these supposed leaks to be pro-assad propaganda

    • kowalityjesus

      can you possibly imagine why Assad would throw chemical weapons at largely innocent people at the perfect moment to justify the highhorse invasion of his sovereign nation? I can’t. It certainly was not strategically necessary…maybe youre a disinfo agent….

      • _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

        counter intelligence planting fake information on the internet to make the US look like they’re behind all the problems, yeah, i can’t see how that would possibly be a good strategy

    • Tom

      Do you have a link to the reddit page please?

      • _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

        they’ve been deleted, sorry :/

        • _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

          just saw this

  • BuzzCoastin

    the night before Der Homeland invaded Iraq
    I watched them unconditionally surrender on TV in Germany
    it was CNN or the BBC or something like that
    but I have never seen that footage again
    no one in Der Homeyland seems to have seen it either
    and
    none of that high priced spy info from the CIA, NSA & All Alphabet Spies
    actually was true or useful
    except as an excuse for the rape-like invasion

    • Carpenter Foreman

      Man I’ve experienced that myself! The most accurate newscast is the very first one.

  • Haystack

    This would be easier to believe if the US were planning to actually invade or something. I don’t think the US really wants war with Syria. It seems more like they just got tangled in the net of their own anti-WMD propaganda, and this is a way to save face by doing something without really doing something.

    Which is a dick move in itself, of course. Remember how we reacted last time someone decided to “punish” us by bombing several of our buildings?

    • InAwe

      I do think a war is wanted.
      I dont think i can say that US wants it per say, given that the citizens themselves dont want to start a war in Syria.
      But a war is definitely wanted by those in who call the shots, otherwise we wouldn’t be looking at this crisis situation in the making.
      Follow the money (and therefore oil)

  • http://www.facebook.com/peter.m.appleby Peter Michael Appleby

    Try to access the deleted page from the Daily Mail above,and it cuts out immediatley.Funny that!

  • antifalseflag

    in January 2001 I started a YouTube channel online dedicated to exposing false flag terror events such as 9/11. I contacted the Daily Mail to ask why this article was removed but they did not reply . the truth is that the world is run by Neo Con Zionists who have a large internet presence. a London company that specialies in cyber warfare called Strategic Communications Laboratories is behind many of the attacks and I suspect may have been involved in attaempting to mass market the syrian chemicall weapons narrative

    bottom line this is the USA and Israel in action

    • Evony Master

      9/11 false flag? You need to take off the tin foil hat.

  • antifalseflag

    on the 18th April the DM printed a retraction in the folliwng article

    Britam Defence, David Goulding and Philip Doughty

    they agreed to pay damages f9or libel

    in my view the original documents are accurate , in particular since we have an IDENTICAL scenario now

    the DM should go to court and get their money back

21