State of the Union Or State Of Obama?

Obama SOTUThe political classes in our country seem to relish moments of high ritual and symbolic occasions with TV news routinely bringing these events to a country more engaged with awards shows and sporting contests.

The State of the Union, the annual presidential projection of power, enjoys a special status because it showcases the prowess of the incumbent to weave a self-congratulatory narrative before what is in effect a peanut galley to cheer him on. Widely understood is that the Congress is at a new low in public approval.

Even when half the office holders, cabinet members, Supreme Court Judges (minus 3) and military brass is sitting on its hands, with some glowering hostility, the acoustics make it seem as if the Speechifier-in-chief’s every word is receiving a standing ovation.  His guests joined in to make it appear as if it was a pep rally or he had won the lottery.

Obama may not be a brilliant politician or program implementer, but he is a good speaker and his speech was crafted like a Hollywood script, sprinkled with humor and closing with a crescendo of bi-partisan patriotic adulation for an injured soldier—the modern equivalent of manipulative flag waving. With wife Michelle beaming love for the obsessive and sickly warrior with his 10 “deployments,” the goal was to reinforce the halo that Obama was hoping would turn around his low approval ratings.

He knew going in that he was doing it as much for his own morale and that of his posse in suits. He read the Washington Post:

“Amid the avalanche of coverage of President Obama’s fifth State of the Union — he’s reading the speech! — it’s important to remember one simple fact: The State of the Union’s ability to shape public perception of a president and his agenda is, um, way overrated.”

The newspaper reporting this reality sandwich to the White House hopesters carried 5,069 items containing the phrase “State of the Union” appearing on its website , hyping an event that they clearly cared more about than the public.

And that’s not just for this year. The Huffington Post reported,

“Public Opinion And History Agree: The State Of The Union Won’t Change Anything.”

Their political analysts write,

“The pattern of State of the Union addresses failing to make much of a dent in public opinion isn’t new, or unique to Obama’s presidency. It’s held largely true for the past five presidents’ addresses.

A new HuffPost/YouGov poll shows the State of the Union may be of minor importance to most Americans. Only 35 percent said that they watched last year’s address, and even fewer — 6 percent — said that they could recall its contents “very well.” Another 23 percent said they remembered it “somewhat well,” while a combined 70 percent said they didn’t remember it very well (28 percent) or didn’t remember it well at all (42 percent).”

So much for the impact of this political uber-coverage!

And what of the speech itself? The New York Times was blistering in its assessment

“A man who entered the White House yearning for sweeping achievements finds himself five years later threatening an end run around gridlock on Capitol Hill by using executive orders, essentially acknowledging both the limits of his ability to push an agenda through Congress and the likelihood that future accomplishments would be narrow.”

The National Journal was equally sarcastic,

“It was a good speech about a modest agenda delivered by a diminished leader, a man who famously promised to reject the politics of ‘small things’ and aim big—to change the culture of Washington, to restore the public’s faith in government, and to tackle enduring national problems with bold solutions. …”

Was that was he was doing? Quite the opposite, writes Ron Fournier who began  his report with a question, “Is that all there is?”

He added,

“Tuesday night was no such moment. It was, instead, a moment in miniature: an executive order to raise the minimum wage for future federal contractors, and another to create ‘starter’ retirement accounts; summits on long-term unemployment and working families; and scores of promises to ‘continue’ existing administration programs.”

William Deane, formerly of CBS and now editor of Our Missing wrote:

“I can’t remember a State of the Union message–and I’ve heard or read about 50 of them– that has declared a go-it-alone policy-if-you-Congress-don’t-do-it-my-way …We understand President Obama’s frustration over a “just say no,” Congress, but the Congress has that right.  The president’s unprecedented: Come along with me or else I’ll do it on my own is bound to anger the GOP majority and invite some form of retaliation.”

There was no love in media land either. Wrap, the Hollywood website reported that one Republican Congressman audibly threatened a reporter to knock him off the balcony.  For all the show of unity, many in the audience were seething with disgust.

The Tea Party was in the end furious, not with Obama who is their perennial target, but House Speaker Boehner who they denounced in the speech’s aftermath as a traitor and sell-out. They issued a declaration of war on the Speaker, claiming he is warring on them.

Fom their official statement issued after the big speech,

“John Boehner declared war against the Tea Party. Publicly and privately, Speaker of the House, John Boehner is waging war on the Tea Party, conservative Republicans, and our values.”

Obama may not have won much support but it seems clear that the main conflict in Washington has moved from the Republican-Democratic axis to a food fight among Republicans.  This development must be dismaying to GOP strategists who believed that they had a chance to take over the Senate because of all the discontent with Obamacare.

Liberals must be dismayed too, especially when Obama embraced drones and spying, justified as necessary to stop terrorist and cyber attacks. His call to close Guantanamo has been echoing for five years with the White House opposed and the Congressional  Torture Caucus still wedded to punishing terrorists who in many cases never have been.

Writing in the Globalist published in Europe, Editor Stephen Richer asked about the President,

“Why has he been so captured by the apparatus? The bubble in the White House is one reason. Relative youth and inexperience another.  Fear of being held accountable “in case something happens” a third. But let’s keep personality traits and political considerations to the side.Obama’s hesitation to stand up for democratic controls of the intelligence machinery is indicative of a fundamental misconception of American freedom.”

Maura Stephens, an anti-fracking activist in upstate New York, was aghast at Obama’s stance on extracting natural gas, writing:

“It was very ironic that the day we were honoring Pete Seeger — a hero of peace and the environment — that President Obama would double down on fracking claims. Seeger has been one of our champions in the fight against fracking in New York State, coming to virtually all of our rallies.”

No one in the media pointed out that Seeger sang with Bruce Springsteen at Obama’s 2009 inauguration. On the day that every newspaper carried heroic obits, Obama said nothing.

There were other criticisms of his unwillingness to challenge the over reliance on tests in schools and new standards to close the unequal gap between wages for women and men. That issue woke the audience up, but no new initiatives were floated.

These critics forget that what Obama was ultimately selling was himself.

My sense: we are back to square one.

News Dissector Danny Schechter blogs at,  and edits His new book is Madiba AtoZ: The Many Faces of Nelson Mandela ( Comments to
  • Juan

    As was to be expected, the state of the union address was an obscene Kabuki puppet show. Not sure what to compare it to, perhaps a verbal Potemkin Village that everyone knows is a blatant fabrication, but plays along with anyway.
    Maybe it’s just me, but this state affairs cannot continue for much longer. It’s like some festering boil just waiting to spew puss all over the place. It’s gonna pop sooner or later.
    What a joke.

    • Calypso_1

      obscene Kabuki
      you have linx?

      • Juan


        • Calypso_1

          opening passageways to the aforementioned

          • Juan

            Just my take on this bit of theater for the imbecile masses. I was speaking metaphorically.
            Didn’t post any links because it’s really easy to look it up.

          • Calypso_1

            Damn the masses, I was looking for kinky kabuki.

          • Rhoid Rager

            I did a search in Japanese with the term “猥褻な文楽” (Obscene bunraku) but all I could find is this little guy.

          • Calypso_1

            not quite my peccadillo.

            could you try ‘naughty noh’ 性の能

          • Rhoid Rager

            There were some deliciously lascivious ukiyoe artists in the Edo period. They created a subculture of underground ukiyoe paintings called 春画浮世絵 shun’ga ukiyoe. The shun in shun’ga means spring and has an erotic connotation associated with it–Japanese culture tends to be very connected to the seasons.

      • Dingbert
        • Calypso_1

          Popcorn time.

    • Rhoid Rager

      Just for the sake of clarification… Bunraku is the puppet theatre. Kabuki is the dynamic theatre with actors in make-up. Noh is the painfully-slow theatre with actors in masks.

      Which one best suits the SOTU analogy?

      • American Cannibal

        Or a muppet?

      • Juan

        I dunno, man. I was clearly mixing metaphors out of ignorance of the finer points of Japanese culture.
        Hard to say, but I guess Obama himself is more of a puppet; so Bunraku works for Barry. The show that was the STOU, is more like Kabuki. Watching this farce unfold and waiting for the idiot masses to get a clue is like the “painfully slow” Noh.

  • mannyfurious

    Obama has done exactly what he was supposed to do. He has helped promote 2 or 3 “progressive” social issues to keep the liberal WASP hordes happy, while allowing a parasitic and openly hostile economic plan to unfold just like his overlords planned.

    Oh, and he’s black, so a good portion of the population was never going to like him, anyway, no matter what he did. In retrospect, this was all too easy for the rulers at large.

  • echar

    I am more concerned embarrassed about that duck dynasty guy, who is a yuppy in hill-billy drag being invited by the republicans.

    • Anarchy Pony

      Seen that picture of them all in polo shirts with the golf clubs?

      • American Cannibal

        Mmhmm… Grade “A” Suburban Douche

      • echar

        Yes. I also understand a lot more about some of the people in the republican party. Such a tawdry move.

  • BuzzCoastin

    the most racist kuntery on earth
    “elected” a black man prez
    yeah, right

    while Obummer has not managed
    to reduce the high levels of black men incarcerated in Der Homeland
    he has managed to further the agenda
    of the wealthy white elites

    hmmmm, what did they call that black overseer in slavery times?
    house prez?
    sumtin like that

    • Eric_D_Read

      “the most racist kuntery on earth

      “elected” a black man prez”
      Israel elected a black president?

      • BuzzCoastin

        Isreal has about 5000 Arab prisoners
        Uncle Homeland has about 1.5 million people of color in jail
        over 80% of all Homeland prisoners are peple of color
        even Isreal is hard pressed to top that

        • Cortacespedes

          So, you don’t think the whole of Gaza and the swiss cheese like West Bank as de facto prison(s)?

          Between the two that’s 4 million people.

          • BuzzCoastin

            Uncle Homeland occupies & controls
            Afghanistan & has major military deployments
            in and around Arab kunteries
            Isreal can’t top that

          • Cortacespedes

            And AIPAC and Israel’s control of AIPAC has never influenced these policies?

          • BuzzCoastin

            aMerkins have a hard time accepting tbeir racism
            but the evidence is clear
            it is the most racist kuntery in the whirled
            Nazi Germany & Isreal pale in comparison

          • Eric_D_Read

            If you really believe that; you might want to cut back on the White Russians, dude.

          • BuzzCoastin

            see what I mean

            I don’t believe
            I have facts
            American Indian genocide & confinement
            slavery that morphed into repression & imprisonment
            the overthrough of the Kingdom of Hawai’i
            the inprisonment of Japanese Americans during ww2
            there is an inexhaustible list of racist atrocities
            by Der Homeland of the Free

          • Eric_D_Read

            Young Earth creationists have facts too.
            They also, like any devout believer, selectively ignore any facts that don’t square with their ideology, as well as view historical events through a colored lens.

            By the events you cite as evidence of racism; nobody in recorded history holds a candle to the British Empire.

          • BuzzCoastin

            if Great Friggins had wip3d out the India Indians
            sequestered ghe small reminder in “reservations”
            filled the remaining land with white Europeans
            & black slaves from Africa
            & the contine to imprison sveral million blacks
            after their emancipation
            I might agree
            and ifvthat was yhd only thing done by aMerka
            I might could agree

            but its splitting hairs
            & Great Friigins is now a puppet of Der Homeland

          • BuzzCoastin

            so yer point is
            that Der Homeland is only the 2nd most racist kuntery?

          • Cortacespedes

            Nope. Just questioning the “5000 Arab prisoners” a bit.

            Israel follows in our wake; just as we followed Great Britain’s.

  • American Cannibal

    I’m sorry. I didn’t watch the STOFU Special, or read anything about it. But did anyone watch last night’s Daily Show? It was tight.

  • markpkessinger

    There was plenty to criticize about the SOTU address, but William Deane’s comment, quoted in the article, to wit, “We understand President Obama’s frustration over a ‘just say no,’ Congress, but the Congress has that right,” is really pretty disingenuous. As contemplated in the Constitution, of course Congress has the right to vote down, and hence block, legislation the President would like to have passed. But nowhere in the Constitution is it contemplated that political party holding a minority one half of one-third of the government would ever have the right to effectively prevent a duly elected President from governing. The right to vote legislation up or down rests with Congress as a whole, and not with a single political party. Senate Republicans have filibustered virtually every piece of legislation Democrats and the President have asked them to pass. In many cases, it was legislation the GOP was on record as having supported. But they didn’t even permit anything to come to a vote. If we’re going to talk about any “right” of Congress, we should at least do so honestly.