Why Discovering Habitable Exoplanets Doesn’t Bode Well For Humanity’s Future



Interstellar civilization may not be out there because it already destroyed itself – and so might we.

Via Discovery:

Last week, scientists announced the discovery of Kepler-186f, a planet 492 light years away in the Cygnus constellation. Kepler-186f is special because it marks the first planet almost exactly the same size as Earth orbiting in the “habitable zone” – the distance from a star in which we might expect liquid water, and perhaps life.

What did not make the news, however, is that this discovery also slightly increases how much credence we give to the possibility of near-term human extinction. This because of a concept known as the Great Filter.

The Great Filter is an argument that attempts to resolve the Fermi Paradox: why have we not found aliens, despite the existence of hundreds of billions of solar systems in our galactic neighborhood in which life might evolve? As the namesake physicist Enrico Fermi noted, it seems rather extraordinary that not a single extraterrestrial signal or engineering project has been detected (UFO conspiracy theorists notwithstanding).

This apparent absence of thriving extraterrestrial civilizations suggests that at least one of the steps from humble planet to interstellar civilization is exceedingly unlikely. The absence could be caused because either intelligent life is extremely rare or intelligent life has a tendency to go extinct. This bottleneck for the emergence of alien civilizations from any one of the many billions of planets is referred to as the Great Filter.

Are We Alone?

What exactly is causing this bottleneck has been the subject of debate for more than 50 years. Explanations could include a paucity of Earth-like planets or self-replicating molecules. Other possibilities could be an improbable jump from simple prokaryotic life (cells without specialized parts) to more complex eukaryotic life – after all, this transition took well over a billion years on Earth.

Proponents of this “Rare Earth” hypothesis also argue that the evolution of complex life requires an exceedingly large number of perfect conditions. In addition to Earth being in the habitable zone of the sun, our star must be far enough away from the galactic centre to avoid destructive radiation, our gas giants must be massive enough to sweep asteroids from Earth’s trajectory, and our unusually large moon stabilizes the axial tilt that gives us different seasons.

These are just a few prerequisites for complex life. The emergence of symbolic language, tools and intelligence could require other such “perfect conditions” as well.

Or Is the Filter Ahead of Us?

While emergence of intelligent life could be rare, the silence could also be the result of intelligent life emerging frequently but subsequently failing to survive for long. Might every sufficiently advanced civilization stumble across a suicidal technology or unsustainable trajectory? We know that a Great Filter prevents the emergence of prosperous interstellar civilizations, but we don’t know whether or not it lies in humanity’s past or awaits us in the future.

Read the rest at Discovery.

12 Comments on "Why Discovering Habitable Exoplanets Doesn’t Bode Well For Humanity’s Future"

  1. Rus Archer | Apr 25, 2014 at 4:14 pm |

    tell that to the dmt elves

  2. “The absence could be caused because either intelligent life is extremely rare or intelligent life has a tendency to go extinct.”

    I dont think these are the only two possibilities. Here are two more theories:

    -Since the government tightly controls all sorts of information to control public panic and dissent, etc.. It is highly likely that if some form of intelligent have visited and we knew about it they covered it up or would if it happened in the future


    -Aliens did already visit earth undetected and have no interest in making contact with us because they observed how terribly we treat our planet and other life forms on it or just how bad we treat members of our own species due to prejudices. If they observed us for even a short amount of time they probably would think we in no way would greet them with open and peaceful arms if they visited us.

  3. Discovering Humanity’s Definition Of Civilization And Life Doesn’t Bode Well For Habitable Exoplanets’ Future

  4. These are not the Spores you’re looking for… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZZP3Cqi7Lk

  5. InfvoCuernos | Apr 25, 2014 at 7:15 pm |

    If this type of speculation interests you, you should investigate a genre of fiction literature known as “science fiction”-its pretty much been all about this for the last 60 or so years. (<==that's sarcasm, sci-fi is also about hot green alien babes and lasers).

  6. Maybe, members of creation have to learn to abide by universal laws of harmony first, and then the higher pathways appear for the worthy? Also keep in mind there are numerous “coincidental” (happening at the same time) patterns which denote life here is not simply a product of random chance. Check out my previous article here for a deeper cut of the relevant data. http://disinfo.com/2014/03/camron-wiltshire-quest-gnosis-666/

  7. Everything that has ever happened on earth regarding intelligent life is a natural progression. Nature progressively destroys itself on a molecular and cosmic level constantly, so we should be comfortable with it and have a good time in the mean time.

  8. Virtually Yours | Apr 26, 2014 at 1:12 am |

    Maybe they have tucked themselves away into energy-efficient Dyson spheres or perhaps they have uploaded themselves into non-biological formats or it could be that our planet is ensconced within a virtual simulation and “they” won’t let us out until we learn to play nice with one another…

  9. Malcolm Reynolds | Apr 26, 2014 at 5:16 am |

    What a ridiculously short sighted, blinkered, and completely unintelligent article. Absolute rubbish.

  10. Rus Archer | Apr 28, 2014 at 12:59 pm |

    by primitive technology, you mean mushrooms?

Comments are closed.