New York Times On ‘Capping’ the Chernobyl Catastrophe

Radiation warning symbolA great article here from the New York Times on efforts to clean up and control damage caused by the Chernobyl catastrophe. One such project involves the construction of a giant shelter to cover the entombed remains of the reactor.

The Chernobyl accident can be likened to a huge dirty bomb, an explosion that spewed radioactive material in all directions. The blast was followed by a fire that sent even more contaminants into the atmosphere that were then carried by winds across the region and into Western Europe.

In this way the disaster differs from nuclear power’s two other major accidents, at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979 and Fukushima in 2011. At both of those plants, reactor cores melted down, but the core material — the nuclear fuel — remained within protective containment structures.

The four reactors at the Chernobyl plant had no such containment. But that was only one aspect of their flawed design. The system for controlling the nuclear fission reaction was temperamental, and under certain conditions reactor power could quickly soar out of control.

That is what happened in the early hours of April 26, 1986, at Chernobyl’s Unit 4, during an ill-advised test of some of the reactor’s safety systems. In a matter of seconds, the reactor power rose exponentially and the core was blasted apart by steam.

A few workers died immediately, but most of the technicians in Unit 4, and the firefighters who initially responded, suffered agonizing deaths over the ensuing weeks from exposure to high levels of radiation.

Officially, several dozen people were killed, and many others became sick. The radiation also caused thousands of later cancers — though just how many is still the subject of much debate.

Keep reading.

4 Comments on "New York Times On ‘Capping’ the Chernobyl Catastrophe"

  1. “One such project involves the construction of a giant shelter to cover the entombed remains of the reactor.”

    I can see it now. Thousands of construction workers lining up in hopes of getting hired to construct a massive project that will take probably a year or more in a area highly contaminted by radiation. Forget the fact radiation exposure effects are cumulative.

  2. Strange that the “Exclusion Zone” is being brought up again after nearly 20 years when it borders another place that hasn’t been spoken of by Western News in 20 years… Ukraine!

  3. Cortacespedes | Apr 29, 2014 at 8:24 pm |

    After the arch is in place, Mr. Dodd said, the plan is for Ukraine to eventually begin removing the unstable structures and the remaining fuel. That will ensure that the radiation does not eventually reach groundwater, which would endanger the water supply for the three million people of Kiev. Ukraine also must build a repository for all the high-level waste it recovers.

    What a “fabulous” place to start a war. Destabilizing the government there was a stroke of “genius”.

    “Soviet radiation, is the best radiation in the world.”– Artur Korneyev

    • After trying to Immanentize The Eschaton® for so long, They™ decided to cultivate multiple vectors to ensure failsafe protocols.

Comments are closed.