The Soft-power of Hong Kong Protesters – Freedoms not enjoyed by Americans, the British, Canadians and Australians

In a recent international human rights forum at Oslo where Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and other jailed Occupy Wall Street protesters such as Cecily McMillan were not invited, BBC revealed (21 Oct. 2014) that, “it is an open secret at this meeting … that plans were hatched for the demonstrations (in Hong Kong) nearly two years ago … perhaps more than 1,000 of them have been given specific training to help make the campaign as effective as possible.” The forum is filled exclusively by well-funded non-western “dissidents” who demonstrate no interest in echoing the voices of the 5,500 anti-US military protesters in Okinawa, or the suffering of the victims of U.S. nuclear tests in the Pacific without compensation, or the extrajudicial killing of almost a thousand unarmed civilians and children within five years by U.S. drone operations in Pakistan alone. The protesters in Hong Kong enjoyed an overwhelming support from the Oslo Freedom Forum, while the death of 5,000 civilians across America since 9/11 by the brutal and trigger happy U.S. police forces were ignored.   

The power of Occupy Hong Kong protesters

The thousands of uncompromised protesters in Hong Kong have strategically and successfully occupied and erected barricades in a number of main thoroughfares (Central, Causeway Bay and Mongkok) causing chaos to traffics, businesses, and residents living in and around the protest zones for over a month now. What most western media failed to report is that, at the beginning of the protests, 3,000 public servants were unable to go to work, 37 bank branches remain closed in the protest zones a month later, tourist arrivals dwindled during the Golden Week in October with up to 40% reduction in sales to the retail industry. Shops in the protest zones desperate for business, offered a 50% storewide discount, but saw no customers at all. A report by BBC at the beginning of the protest (3 October) revealed that ANZ bank estimated that the protests may have cost the city’s retailers more than HK$2bn.

As a result of the barricades, ambulances on emergency calls were unable to travel to the nearest hospital causing the death of a patient. Residents in the protest zones complain about the disruption to their daily lives as public transportation and taxis were not available for them to travel to work or send their children to school. An elderly woman with walking problems was reportedly forced on foot to visit the hospital for her medications.

An on TV open debate that was arranged for the protesters to directly air their views to the government and public failed to satisfy the protesters.

An order issued by the High Court on 21 October, 2014 to end the illegal assembly has been ignored.

Images of protesters playing mahjong and table tennis in the middle of the streets, having carnival-like-fun, enjoying themselves with hotpots, were basically ignored by the western media.

The Time report titled ‘The Main Hong Kong Protest Site is a Perfect Anarchist Collective’ has an accurate description of the protests: “There are no leaders, but everything, from the supply tents to the recycling stations, runs just beautifully.”

The powerless majority

Two months before the planned Occupy Central protest, over a million signatures have been gathered in Hong Kong in opposition to the planned protests. In August, hundreds of thousands rallied against the planned Occupy movement. At the beginning of the Occupy protests, 1.5 million Hong Kong people have again signed a petition to demand for peace and rejection of the Occupy Central movement. A Facebook site in the name of ‘Silent Majority For Hong Kong’ is liked by more than 90,000 people. On 6 October, a Hong Konger was videoed emotionally kowtowing to student protesters telling them: “Please go home, we have kids to feed.” On 13 October, truck and taxi drivers and union members tried to talk to the student protesters and tear down the barricades, but the students wouldn’t listen. In a Reuters (UK) article, a protester described the hundreds of people who tore down protest barriers as “look[ing] like gangsters.” On 14 October, an 88 year old elderly man was reportedly kneeling in front the student protesters urging them to “open up the road so that people can go to school and work as usual.” The frustration against the dictatorial and non-reasoning protesters by the average Hong Kong people can be felt by simply viewing the daily video footages on the Hong Kong TVs (not the Western media). That same day, a number of police officers were reportedly removed from positions after an alleged beating of a protester caught on video. On 28 October, 550 Hong Kong doctors liken Occupy movement to ‘cancer’ in a petition calling for an end to the protests. On 4 November, a report by The Straits Times revealed that the Alliance for Peace and Democracy collected more than 1.83 million signatures within 9 days in a campaign to end the Occupy protests.

Protesters’ soft-power and the “Free” world leaders, NGOs and media

Earlier on, when Hong Kong police tried unsuccessfully to remove protesters with tear gas and arrests, the Human Rights Watch emailed to subscribers an article titled ‘Hong Kong: Free Protesters, Avoid Excessive Force.’ Amnesty International did the same with a series of articles such as ‘China: Immediately release supporters of Hong Kong protests’ and ‘Hong Kong: alarming Police response to student pro-democracy protest’. Western leaders also took turn to condemn the Hong Kong authorities and Beijing against the crackdown on protesters. For example, David Cameron said, “UK will stand up for Hong Kong Protesters’ rights.”  The US Congress released a special Congressional report on Hong Kong openly supporting the protesters. So has Canada and the surprisingly (this time only) less aggressive Australia. Western media (just to name a few, CNN, Wall Street Journal, Murdoch’s News, Washington Post) liken the crackdown as possibly another Tiananmen Square massacre in the making. They all ignored the confessions made by a number of their own journalists, declassified western government documents, the work of historians and eye witnesses accounts about the fact that, “no one die at Tiananmen Square” in 1989, and that the violence was started by the so-called “unarmed” and “peaceful” protesters. Click here for an example of how the BBC manufactured the perception of a “Massacre” without having to show their viewers a single shot of a dead person.

What China can learn from the “Free” world about protest management

In the eyes of the “Free” world and their so-called “NGOs” and “Free” media, the freedom of the Western trained Hong Kong protesters to disrupt the city economy and the daily life of the average Hong Kong people out weighed the rights of the entire population’s freedom to use those public spaces.

Chinese leadership may have been too busy dealing with dignitaries across the world hoping to build a 21st Century Silk Roads through their high speed rail diplomacy, BRICs’ Bank, the 4th Plenum and the APEC summit in Beijing. Their lack of attention and silence on the Hong Kong protests did not exempt them from the smear campaign by the Western media.

As a researcher of media disinformation, I always believe in the power of comparisons. Human rights and freedom are not single sum games, the only way to objectively assess the issues is to compare what others did given the similar circumstances.

During the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests in America, anti-protest laws were strengthened to ban serving food and setting up tents across the country. This is to ensure that the protesters were unable to sustain their protests. As a result, homeless communities across America became the collateral victims of the new laws. As the US economy continues to struggle with more and more angry citizens, in 2014, more and more cities across America join the rank to make it illegal to hand out food to the homeless.

The protesters in Hong Kong and Tiananmen Square in 1989 were the ones who erected the barricades. Conversely, in the land of “Freedom,” it was actually the US government who erected the barricades against the protesters. The so-called anti-Wall Street protests actually did not take place at Wall Street as they were not allowed to. In August, 2014, it was reported that ‘Protests in New York City lead to police barricades and arrests.’

Ironically, while the Hong Kong government arranged a live telecast meeting with the protesters, as did the Beijing government (through Premier Li Peng) during the 1989 Tiananmen incident, the US president did not bother to address the concerns of the protesters in regards to the issue of 99% vs. 1%. At a fundraising event while President Obama addressed the 1% who were paying up to $35,800 each for a diner with him, the protesters were reportedly “penned in an enclosure of barricades, informed that the area has been designated a ‘frozen zone’ until the president departure.”

While the “Free” world leaders defended the rights of Hong Kong protesters to continue occupying and obstructing the rights and freedoms of the entire Hong Kong population to use those barricaded roads, it is a known reality that the laws in the entire western “Free” world criminalised protesters who obstruct traffics during a protest. One of the most classic examples was during the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests in New York. The protesters who marched across Brooklyn Bridge were reportedly blocked off by police after actually being allowed onto the roadway. Once they met the police line, they ended up being arrested one by one for obstruction of traffic. Over 700 arrested this way.

A website documenting the arrests of Occupy protesters across America with hyperlinks to the sources of each arrest documented almost 8,000 arrested in 122 cities. If one clicks through all the links on the website to view the respective reports, images and videos, one will notice that the media friendly weapons used by the US authorities against the protesters include (but not exclusively) the following:

Peppy spray and other chemical weapons

Peppy ball guns

Rubber bullets



Punching on the face



Flash-bang devices

Bean bag guns

The name of these media friendly weapons sound harmless, however, if one searches Wikipedia, one will notice that many of the media friendly weapons are extremely painful and harmful to their victims with cases of reported deaths and permanent injuries each year.

The same situation in Canada, in order to prevent the spread of the anti-capitalist movement, the Canadian government indiscriminately arrested 1,100 protesters in 2011. A year later, only 24 of them were convicted for violating any law. At a time of economic hardship and rising social anger, the Harper government enacted a new law in 2013 threatening masked protesters with ten-year jail terms. Arresting protesters in Canada is as common as in the US, an incident in March, 2014 alone saw 300 arrested at Montreal for protesting against police brutality.

Australia government is also not an angel to protesters. At a time of rising social dissatisfactions, new anti-protest laws were introduced in the past year. Just to name a few, in 2013, the State of Queensland enacted an ‘anti-association law.’ In 2014, Victoria introduced a ‘move on law,’ so that police could arrest any protester that refused to obey their order to leave. In Tasmania, the new anti-protest laws were criticised by the United Nation as “contravenes Australia’s human rights obligations.” A recent report by The Australian revealed that a special Brisbane court will be operating around-the-clock from 10 November, five days before the G20 summit to handle potential mass arrests against anti-capitalism protesters. The new anti-protest laws, G20 (Safety and Security) Act 2013, that governed the Brisbane operation, was passed in October, 2013.

In Britain, despite PM Cameron’s pledge to defend the rights of Hong Kong protesters in early October, a report by Euro News (20 October) revealed that merely 3 days into the protests, the Westminster police already decided to remove the tents and protesters under a new law which forbids anyone from sleeping on the green opposite parliament.

Perhaps Beijing and Hong Kong authorities should learn from the “Free” world in enacting new laws to remove protesters who break the laws with decisiveness. The perception of freedom and human rights as western values is nothing more than the propaganda power of the western media. Protesters in Hong Kong and other developing nations should be realistic with their expectations. Freedom must go hand in hand with social responsibility. The freedom of others to use those public spaces should be respected.

Written by: Wei Ling Chua

Author of the books: ‘Tiananmen Square ‘Massacre’? The Power of Words vs. Silence Evidence’

and ‘Democracy – What the west can learn from China

Facebook author page:

Blog: (best view using laptop and desktop)

Amazon author page:


Wei Ling Chua

Accredited INS and ANFS Freelance Journalist
Independent Researcher of Media Disinformation
Author of a series of books relating to the issue of media disinformation and how it is affecting the world and humanity
Alert me with more stories:

9 Comments on "The Soft-power of Hong Kong Protesters – Freedoms not enjoyed by Americans, the British, Canadians and Australians"

  1. So, I’ve obviously read this entire piece for editing purposes (please let me know if I missed anything). This is the second piece of Wei Ling Chua’s I’ve edited and have skimmed some of Chua’s other work. I’m still questioning his motives about the whole Tiananmen thing. But from what I can tell, there was definitely some media manipulation going on around that whole event. Here’s an article that I came across that maybe of interest to some of the Disinfonauts.

    • BuzzCoastin | Nov 13, 2014 at 1:17 pm |

      having lived in China for 4 years
      I can assure you there’s media manipulation going on
      the picture of China painted by the western “free” press
      is a actually a gross caricature of the western shadow
      how would anyone know this first hand?
      why is xenophobia so easy to manipulate?

      ps, I think the surname is Chua not Chu

      • Ugh, you’re right about the surname. I’ve edited to reflect that.

        I wish I had the answers to your questions.

        • BuzzCoastin | Nov 13, 2014 at 1:31 pm |

          the answers are easy
          most aMerkins don’t travel outside aMerka
          and have nothing with which to compare the propoganda
          and xenophobia is part of human nature
          easily exploited by those in power

    • Shouldn’t ‘Bradley’ be Chelsea Manning (that’s who he links to)?

  2. BuzzCoastin | Nov 13, 2014 at 1:26 pm |

    every time I watched police brutalize Occupy protestors
    I used to think
    good thing I’m in China

  3. Earthstar | Nov 13, 2014 at 2:13 pm |

    I feel like the Chinese government cares for her people; cares for some people way more than for others, but still cares. Our governments care only for money and treats it’s people as currency.

    • BuzzCoastin | Nov 13, 2014 at 8:13 pm |

      the Chinese government
      cares primarily about itself
      the people of China have expectations
      that the government must meet
      and with 5000 years experience
      of governmental yin yang
      the govrrnment tends to be responsive
      to public clamor
      knowing how easily Dynasties fall

    • The citizens of the US are viewed by the oligarchs and their state stooges as fodder, a cheap and exploitable resource for the corporate state.

Comments are closed.