Now, the downside there of course is that Illuminati agents have entered into the minds of their government agencies and are currently installing NWO domination plans. Poor fools.
No, the real reason I’m posting this has to do with just how much utter nonsense I saw in my feed spreading blatant lies about how Australia’s gun program has been some sort of unmitigated disaster. It’s like, nothing’s perfect but I’m fairly sure none of what you just posted has any basis in reality whatsoever. If it was like one post I could have scrolled past it but it was like 10. I can’t believe it’s come to this, but Disinfo.com has to get all fact check-y (from the communist publication factcheck.org, who just updated it a few days ago due to demand):
“In 2011, David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, co-authored a paper that reviewed the available studies, as of 2011, on the effect of Australia’s buyback program on firearm deaths. He wrote that “many studies … found strong evidence for a beneficial effect of the law.”
Hemenway and his Harvard colleague and co-author, Mary Vriniotis, summarized the evidence in support of the theory that the buyback program saved lives:
- “While 13 gun massacres (the killing of 4 or more people at one time) occurred in Australia in the 18 years before the NFA, resulting in more than one hundred deaths, in the 14 following years (and up to the present), there were no gun massacres.”
- “In the seven years before the NFA (1989-1995), the average annual firearm suicide death rate per 100,000 was 2.6 (with a yearly range of 2.2 to 2.9); in the seven years after the buyback was fully implemented (1998-2004), the average annual firearm suicide rate was 1.1 (yearly range 0.8 to 1.4).”
- “In the seven years before the NFA, the average annual firearm homicide rate per 100,000 was .43 (range .27 to .60) while for the seven years post NFA, the average annual firearm homicide rate was .25 (range .16 to .33).”
- “[T]he drop in firearm deaths was largest among the type of firearms most affected by the buyback.”
The authors, however, noted that “no study has explained why gun deaths were falling, or why they might be expected to continue to fall.” That poses difficulty in trying to definitively determine the impact of the law, they write.
“Whether or not one wants to attribute the effects as being due to the law, everyone should be pleased with what happened in Australia after the NFA — the elimination of firearm massacres (at least up to the present) and an immediate, and continuing, reduction in firearm suicide and firearm homicide,” the authors write.”
Latest posts by Thad McKraken (see all)
- The Death And Resurrection of Krautrock: Omega - Feb 15, 2018
- Breath Work Will Fuck Your Shit Up Something Proper - Feb 14, 2018
- The People Who Don’t Believe In Hypnosis: This Week on the Disinfocast - Feb 13, 2018